|
|
Post by silverdollar on Jan 9, 2017 19:26:28 GMT
Saved ourselves the disappointment of drawing Liverpool away!
|
|
|
|
Post by stokief on Jan 9, 2017 19:30:37 GMT
Be kicking ourselves if Plymouth pull off a Cup shock though eh?!  Actually, we'd probably only balls that one up too |
|
|
|
Post by biglad180 on Jan 9, 2017 19:39:20 GMT
good job we are out then
|
|
|
|
Post by simple on Jan 9, 2017 19:44:29 GMT
Missed out on a massive away following against a load of kids.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Jan 9, 2017 19:59:03 GMT
Feel a lot better now. Liverpool are a racing certainty to go through, we would almost certainly lose at Liverpool and I'm the eternal optimist.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Jan 9, 2017 20:03:35 GMT
Why would we have drawn the same opponents as Wolves?
Would we not have had a different numbered ball to Wolves?
|
|
|
|
Post by albundy on Jan 9, 2017 20:15:23 GMT
As we were the 22nd tie drawn in round 3 wolves had ball 22. Why would we have drawn the same opponents as Wolves? Would we not have had a different numbered ball to Wolves? |
|
|
|
Post by boothenboys1863 on Jan 9, 2017 20:27:45 GMT
As we were the 22nd tie drawn in round 3 wolves had ball 22. Why would we have drawn the same opponents as Wolves? Would we not have had a different numbered ball to Wolves? I genuinely never knew that's how it worked.. you learn something new every day.. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2017 20:30:29 GMT
here we go again
we are not in the draw
you cannot assume we would draw those that wolves did
its a different draw you see
|
|
|
|
Post by albundy on Jan 9, 2017 20:33:20 GMT
Incorrect. Ball 22 was always going to be us...Liverpool were whatever number tie they were in round 3. The teams may be different but the same numbers would have come out here we go again we are not in the draw you cannot assume we would draw those that wolves did its a different draw you see |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2017 20:35:14 GMT
how do you know ball 22 would always be us ?
and how do you know it wouldve been drawn agaisnt Liverpool if it had been us ?
answers ( 2 ) YOU DONT KNOW
|
|
|
|
Post by albundy on Jan 9, 2017 20:38:16 GMT
Because the numbers relate to the tie number from round 3. Ball 22 would have been drawn against ball 17 whatever happened irrespective of which clubs were attached to it. Does that explain it clearly enough for you to understand? how do you know ball 22 would always be us ? and how do you know it wouldve been drawn agaisnt Liverpool if it had been us ? answers ( 2 ) YOU DONT KNOW |
|
|
|
Post by albundy on Jan 9, 2017 20:40:08 GMT
Nice use of bold btw. Shout a little louder how do you know ball 22 would always be us ? and how do you know it wouldve been drawn agaisnt Liverpool if it had been us ? answers ( 2 ) YOU DONT KNOW |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 9, 2017 20:41:19 GMT
how do you know ball 22 would always be us ? and how do you know it wouldve been drawn agaisnt Liverpool if it had been us ? answers ( 2 ) YOU DONT KNOW Why the fuck are you so bothered after your usual response to the FA Cup last Saturday?Who's Wrexham got? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2017 20:42:47 GMT
you cannot assume, had Stoke city gone through, wed have drawn liverpool
it wouldve been a different draw because we would be in it -not wolves
I dont know how to explain this in simple terms
|
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 9, 2017 20:45:38 GMT
you cannot assume, had Stoke city gone through, wed have drawn liverpool it wouldve been a different draw because we would be in it -not wolves I dont know how to explain this in simple terms The number of the ball was the same whether it be Stoke or Wolves it's the ball number of the match |
|
|
|
Post by albundy on Jan 9, 2017 20:47:19 GMT
Ball 22 and 17 would have been drawn together. Balls with numbers on are drawn...not names The teams allocated to those balls are predetermined by the draw from round 3 so stoke/wolves was always 22 and liv/ply was always 17. Makes no difference at all to who else went through. The facthings wolves were in not us is irrelevant. Whoever got through was 22. you cannot assume, had Stoke city gone through, wed have drawn liverpool it wouldve been a different draw because we would be in it -not wolves I dont know how to explain this in simple terms |
|
|
|
Post by foxysgloves on Jan 9, 2017 20:49:55 GMT
Why would we have drawn the same opponents as Wolves? Would we not have had a different numbered ball to Wolves? If a sparrow farts in a bush.... Or something like that. |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 9, 2017 20:51:54 GMT
You're wasting your time mate with Tony he's a very stubborn individual who's won't accept it when he's wrong and all this from a bloke that doesn't give a shit about the FA Cup🤔
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2017 20:53:26 GMT
see if you can get your head around causality
Causal link. Causality (also referred to as causation, or cause and effect) is the agency or efficacy that connects one process (the cause) with another process or state (the effect), where the first is understood to be partly responsible for the second, and the second is dependent on the first.
does thing ring any bells ???/ - we get this every fucking year
if we were in the draw instead of wolves - how can you possibly assume the balls woul've come out the fucking same ???????
liverpool versus stoke or whatever it was- and the answer is - for those in Stoke who cannot grasp this concept
YOU CANT !!!!!!
wed have probably drawn united - because its got the same likelyhood
and its a different draw
mind you, Daily Star readers will think otherwise whilst looking at all the tits
|
|
|
|
Post by albundy on Jan 9, 2017 20:55:12 GMT
Ball 22 came out against ball 17. That would not have changed would it see if you can get your head around causality Causal link. Causality (also referred to as causation, or cause and effect) is the agency or efficacy that connects one process (the cause) with another process or state (the effect), where the first is understood to be partly responsible for the second, and the second is dependent on the first. does thing ring any bells ???/ - we get this every fucking year if we were in the draw instead of wolves - how can you possibly assume the balls woul've come out the fucking same ??????? liverpool versus stoke or whatever it was- and the answer is - for those in Stoke who cannot grasp this concept YOU CANT !!!!!! wed have probably drawn united - because its got the same likelyhood |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2017 20:57:06 GMT
SO AGAIN
if Stoke had gone through
how do you possibly know the balls wouldve been drawn the same way and in the same order?
you cannot know that
|
|
|
|
Post by albundy on Jan 9, 2017 20:58:04 GMT
Makes no difference who was in the draw Ball 22 was drawn against ball 17. SO AGAIN if Stoke had gone through how do you possibly know the balls wouldve been drawn the same way and in the same order? you cannot know that |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2017 21:00:50 GMT
see if you can get your head around causality Causal link. Causality (also referred to as causation, or cause and effect) is the agency or efficacy that connects one process (the cause) with another process or state (the effect), where the first is understood to be partly responsible for the second, and the second is dependent on the first. does thing ring any bells ???/ - we get this every fucking year if we were in the draw instead of wolves - how can you possibly assume the balls woul've come out the fucking same ??????? liverpool versus stoke or whatever it was- and the answer is - for those in Stoke who cannot grasp this concept YOU CANT !!!!!! wed have probably drawn united - because its got the same likelyhood and its a different draw mind you, Daily Star readers will think otherwise whilst looking at all the tits Fuck me, you are stubborn aren't you. Based on this draw, where ball 17 plays ball 22, had we beaten Wolves, would have played Liverpool. Simples. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2017 21:02:05 GMT
yes but if stoke had gone through the draw might have been different
you cannot assume it would be the same
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 9, 2017 21:02:54 GMT
will somebody intelligent please explain this to them
ive had enough
|
|
|
|
Post by BristolMick on Jan 9, 2017 21:03:37 GMT
SO AGAIN if Stoke had gone through how do you possibly know the balls wouldve been drawn the same way and in the same order? you cannot know that Sliding doors and all that? You have a point about that many things are completely different because of something no matter how seemingly minor happened that then effects everything else. In the sliding doors film of course it was getting on or missing a train. However in this case I don't think the teams that won through the third round makes any difference at all because the ball number is allocated to each third round game. It's a stretch therefore to see how it makes any difference whether we, Wolves, Liverpool or Argyle won through. BM |
|
|
|
Post by Titan Uranus on Jan 9, 2017 21:05:14 GMT
Butterfly effect.
If we had been in the draw instead of Wolves we wouldn't necessarily be playing Liverpool.
It would have been a different draw.
Maybe difficult to comprehend for some people but Tony's correct.
|
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on Jan 9, 2017 21:05:26 GMT
see if you can get your head around causality Causal link. Causality (also referred to as causation, or cause and effect) is the agency or efficacy that connects one process (the cause) with another process or state (the effect), where the first is understood to be partly responsible for the second, and the second is dependent on the first. does thing ring any bells ???/ - we get this every fucking year if we were in the draw instead of wolves - how can you possibly assume the balls woul've come out the fucking same ??????? liverpool versus stoke or whatever it was- and the answer is - for those in Stoke who cannot grasp this concept YOU CANT !!!!!! wed have probably drawn united - because its got the same likelyhood Perhaps if the draw occurred at another time or in a different universe. It didn't and in actuality 17 vs 22 got drawn. Those numbers refer to the ties, rather than individual teams. The result on saturday did not and would not alter the numbers drawn today. The winner of each tie face each other. If we'd won we'd be facing Liverpool or Plymouth. Certainty. Don't get more causal than that. There would not have been some unseen butterfly effect to alter the draw if we'd won the tie. It's a break from the welcome mat your putting out for Saido I suppose. Funny you should accuse him of a bad attitude, what do you think he is, childish or disrespectful? |
|
|
|
Post by albundy on Jan 9, 2017 21:05:54 GMT
The actual...realike life.. 4th round draw of the family cup saw ball 17 and 22 drawn together. will somebody intelligent explain this to them |
|
Actually, we'd probably only balls that one up too
