|
Post by metalhead on Mar 2, 2015 13:48:45 GMT
Walters on 33, Crouch on 32. Certainly not beyond the realms of possibility. The race is on Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 2, 2015 13:58:38 GMT
Walters on 33, Crouch on 32. Certainly not beyond the realms of possibility. The race is on Thoughts? That they've certainly shown the wankstains a thing or two.
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Mar 2, 2015 13:59:30 GMT
Walters on 33, Crouch on 32. Certainly not beyond the realms of possibility. The race is on Thoughts? That they've certainly shown the wankstains a thing or two. Nope. Not a Pulis thread. Talk about Walters and Crouch please
|
|
|
Post by 2004 on Mar 2, 2015 16:38:35 GMT
How many for Stoke have they got in all competitions? Would be nice if they both got 50 for Stoke.
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Mar 2, 2015 16:53:29 GMT
How many for Stoke have they got in all competitions? Would be nice if they both got 50 for Stoke. Walters on 49. Crouch on 41.
|
|
|
Post by 2004 on Mar 2, 2015 16:59:02 GMT
How many for Stoke have they got in all competitions? Would be nice if they both got 50 for Stoke. Walters on 49. Crouch on 41. Didn't realise Jon was that close. His 50th will come at the Hawthorns
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Mar 2, 2015 16:59:51 GMT
Would love that
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Mar 2, 2015 17:00:39 GMT
Not as nice as if crouch gets his 50th at the hawthorns.
|
|
|
Post by 2004 on Mar 2, 2015 17:02:20 GMT
Not as nice as if crouch gets his 50th at the hawthorns.
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Mar 2, 2015 17:04:34 GMT
Not as nice as if crouch gets his 50th at the hawthorns. Wouldn't be too bad that
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Mar 2, 2015 17:27:10 GMT
Depends if Moses starts taking our penalties as SJW has been our main penalty taker
SJW to score at The Hawthorns would be great
Let's hope the extra days rest will help his fitness / knee problem
|
|
|
Post by riponstokie on Mar 2, 2015 18:31:11 GMT
Out of interest of the 46 headed goals Crouchy has scored does any one have any idea how many of those he has scored in a Stoke shirt?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2015 18:34:14 GMT
Walters on 33, Crouch on 32. Certainly not beyond the realms of possibility. The race is on Thoughts? That they've certainly shown the wankstains a thing or two. No they haven't. Got nothing to do with that at all? Why hijack a thread straight away?
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 3, 2015 7:17:21 GMT
That they've certainly shown the wankstains a thing or two. No they haven't. Got nothing to do with that at all? Why hijack a thread straight away? yes they have these pair have come in for plenty of stick over the years from the pulis hating spunk bubbles
|
|
|
Post by huddy on Mar 3, 2015 9:40:54 GMT
Crouch particularly has been slaughtered by the 'cognoscenti'.All of whom have been quiet,very quiet about him for four games
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Mar 3, 2015 9:52:07 GMT
Crouch particularly has been slaughtered by the 'cognoscenti'.All of whom have been quiet,very quiet about him for four games He's hardly been slaughtered has he? People have questioned the merits of him starting games regularly when surrounded by certain other players, and they are perfectly valid observations. The fact that his impact as a substitute has been more consistent than his impact when starting backs that up. He's been playing well of late, whether as a starter or a substitute and Mark Hughes is consistently getting the best out of him. Long may that continue. However, the debate continues ahead of tomorrow's game given Crouch and Adam both had a positive impact on Saturday's game. I wouldn't be entertaining the thought of starting both of them, together with Walters because we instantly go from being a team with pace on the counter attack to a cumbersome team who are relatively easy to defend against. For me, it would be the team that started against Man City tomorrow with Crouch and Diouf up top, Adam on the bench with Walters who looked to be struggling with injury again on Saturday.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Mar 3, 2015 9:55:51 GMT
No they haven't. Got nothing to do with that at all? Why hijack a thread straight away? yes they have these pair have come in for plenty of stick over the years from the pulis hating spunk bubbles Didn't realise Walters has only been playing for us for 2 seasons. And I'm not having a dig at him, just pointing out that he's not prolific and as such his goalscoring record can't be used as an argument here.
|
|
|
Post by potterpaul on Mar 3, 2015 10:01:21 GMT
Crouch particularly has been slaughtered by the 'cognoscenti'.All of whom have been quiet,very quiet about him for four games He's hardly been slaughtered has he? People have questioned the merits of him starting games regularly when surrounded by certain other players, and they are perfectly valid observations. The fact that his impact as a substitute has been more consistent than his impact when starting backs that up. He's been playing well of late, whether as a starter or a substitute and Mark Hughes is consistently getting the best out of him. Long may that continue. However, the debate continues ahead of tomorrow's game given Crouch and Adam both had a positive impact on Saturday's game. I wouldn't be entertaining the thought of starting both of them, together with Walters because we instantly go from being a team with pace on the counter attack to a cumbersome team who are relatively easy to defend against. For me, it would be the team that started against Man City tomorrow with Crouch and Diouf up top, Adam on the bench with Walters who looked to be struggling with injury again on Saturday. 442 Dave? Not sure I like that idea. Agree with Walters looking sluggish and for me Arnie needs to given a run of games on the right. Think we should stick as close to the 4231 as we can, it's paying dividends
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 3, 2015 10:01:37 GMT
yes they have these pair have come in for plenty of stick over the years from the pulis hating spunk bubbles Didn't realise Walters has only been playing for us for 2 seasons. And I'm not having a dig at him, just pointing out that he's not prolific and as such his goalscoring record can't be used as an argument here. yes it can... you just have to put it into to context of where he often plays for us as well. both get regularly slated and both have always done the business.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 3, 2015 10:02:34 GMT
Crouch particularly has been slaughtered by the 'cognoscenti'.All of whom have been quiet,very quiet about him for four games He's hardly been slaughtered has he? People have questioned the merits of him starting games regularly when surrounded by certain other players, and they are perfectly valid observations. The fact that his impact as a substitute has been more consistent than his impact when starting backs that up. He's been playing well of late, whether as a starter or a substitute and Mark Hughes is consistently getting the best out of him. Long may that continue. However, the debate continues ahead of tomorrow's game given Crouch and Adam both had a positive impact on Saturday's game. I wouldn't be entertaining the thought of starting both of them, together with Walters because we instantly go from being a team with pace on the counter attack to a cumbersome team who are relatively easy to defend against. For me, it would be the team that started against Man City tomorrow with Crouch and Diouf up top, Adam on the bench with Walters who looked to be struggling with injury again on Saturday. you fucking slaughter Crouch you fibbing so and so....
|
|
|
Post by wearepremierleague on Mar 3, 2015 10:04:37 GMT
Crouch particularly has been slaughtered by the 'cognoscenti'.All of whom have been quiet,very quiet about him for four games He's hardly been slaughtered has he? People have questioned the merits of him starting games regularly when surrounded by certain other players, and they are perfectly valid observations. The fact that his impact as a substitute has been more consistent than his impact when starting backs that up. He's been playing well of late, whether as a starter or a substitute and Mark Hughes is consistently getting the best out of him. Long may that continue. However, the debate continues ahead of tomorrow's game given Crouch and Adam both had a positive impact on Saturday's game. I wouldn't be entertaining the thought of starting both of them, together with Walters because we instantly go from being a team with pace on the counter attack to a cumbersome team who are relatively easy to defend against. For me, it would be the team that started against Man City tomorrow with Crouch and Diouf up top, Adam on the bench with Walters who looked to be struggling with injury again on Saturday. You want to play the team that got beat 4-1 twice? No thanks 4-4-2 doesn't work. Adam to start tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by huddy on Mar 3, 2015 10:04:38 GMT
Crouch particularly has been slaughtered by the 'cognoscenti'.All of whom have been quiet,very quiet about him for four games He's hardly been slaughtered has he? People have questioned the merits of him starting games regularly when surrounded by certain other players, and they are perfectly valid observations. The fact that his impact as a substitute has been more consistent than his impact when starting backs that up. He's been playing well of late, whether as a starter or a substitute and Mark Hughes is consistently getting the best out of him. Long may that continue. However, the debate continues ahead of tomorrow's game given Crouch and Adam both had a positive impact on Saturday's game. I wouldn't be entertaining the thought of starting both of them, together with Walters because we instantly go from being a team with pace on the counter attack to a cumbersome team who are relatively easy to defend against. For me, it would be the team that started against Man City tomorrow with Crouch and Diouf up top, Adam on the bench with Walters who looked to be struggling with injury again on Saturday.
|
|
|
Post by Done it for scfcbuxton on Mar 3, 2015 10:04:43 GMT
Just to throw this in the equation, Ricardo Fuller managed 50 goals for Stoke.
|
|
|
Post by cheekymatt71 on Mar 3, 2015 10:24:59 GMT
How many players have scored 50 or more goals for Stoke? Now theres a question for the boffins
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 3, 2015 10:27:57 GMT
Just to throw this in the equation, Ricardo Fuller managed 50 goals for Stoke. in the prem though? no...so shut it!!
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Mar 3, 2015 10:31:50 GMT
No they haven't. Got nothing to do with that at all? Why hijack a thread straight away? yes they have these pair have come in for plenty of stick over the years from the pulis hating spunk bubbles Your rock is calling.
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Mar 3, 2015 10:36:26 GMT
Can we cut the Pulis crap please? I'm not a PHW but I started this thread to discuss and appreciate two of our players not discuss Tony. If you want to talk about him, start a thread entitled "crouch Walters under pulis and Hughes", don't hijack a thread where it's not wanted.
Ta.
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Mar 3, 2015 10:39:27 GMT
Crouch particularly has been slaughtered by the 'cognoscenti'.All of whom have been quiet,very quiet about him for four games Says the man who 'slaughters' Diouf on a regular basis. The same mame Diouf that has a whole 1 goal less than Crouch with 2 less apperances.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Mar 3, 2015 10:58:21 GMT
Can we cut the Pulis crap please? I'm not a PHW but I started this thread to discuss and appreciate two of our players not discuss Tony. If you want to talk about him, start a thread entitled "crouch Walters under pulis and Hughes", don't hijack a thread where it's not wanted. Ta. Ok, I'll answer it a different way. What a fucking stupid question. Does it really matter?
|
|
|
Post by Done it for scfcbuxton on Mar 3, 2015 11:09:01 GMT
Just to throw this in the equation, Ricardo Fuller managed 50 goals for Stoke. in the prem though? no...so shut it!! Whats that got to do with it I was actually making the point how well these two have done to come up so close to one of the greatest Stoke players in recent times, the fact they've exclusively been whilst the club is in the Premier League just highlights that point even more, also the fact Crouch has played 60 odd less games than Ric
|
|