|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 23, 2014 12:50:46 GMT
Chelsea shouldn't be allowed to sell Mata to Manure as they are only doing it to hurt his teams challenge for honours.
Apparently it isn't fair to Arsenal, its fans or other fans because it goes against the integrity of the competition.
What a tool. Ban throw ins to stop little old Stoke bullying and beating his team of calcium deficient surrender monkeys and now this!
What an arse!
|
|
|
|
Post by Not_Nick_H on Jan 23, 2014 12:54:14 GMT
He really does think Arsenal should be a Harlem Globetrotters of football doesn't he?
|
|
|
|
Post by stoke111 on Jan 23, 2014 12:54:46 GMT
Comments like this is the reason why everyone hates him! Was any other manager moaning when he sold Persie to his rivals?! A transfer is a transfer no matter what time it's done.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Jan 23, 2014 12:55:26 GMT
Why is he sticking his beak into other clubs business anyway?
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcno1fan on Jan 23, 2014 12:58:07 GMT
Was just about to post this.
What a moron.
The sooner he clears off from football the better.
|
|
|
|
Post by ersaurebot 1, 000, 000 views on Jan 23, 2014 12:58:27 GMT
I heard on the wireless yesterday that they were saying what a clever move it was, Chelsea get the best bit of 40 mil for him and he doesn't have to play against them til next season, therefore all he is likely to do is improve utd (not enough to make them win the league) but maybe help them to take points off the other teams around Chelsea!
very clever!
|
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Jan 23, 2014 12:58:28 GMT
He'll be crying about having to play at the Brit soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Jan 23, 2014 12:58:37 GMT
His argument is that Chelsea have played Man United twice this season so it's unfair that Mata won't have to play against Chelsea but can face Arsenal in 2013/14.
Yeah, the bloke is an arse.
|
|
|
|
Post by alster on Jan 23, 2014 13:00:12 GMT
Chelsea shouldn't be allowed to sell Mata to Manure as they are only doing it to hurt his teams challenge for honours. Apparently it isn't fair to Arsenal, its fans or other fans because it goes against the integrity of the competition. What a tool. Ban throw ins to stop little old Stoke bullying and beating his team of calcium deficient surrender monkeys and now this! What an arse! Crazy fooker, ought to be pre occupied with finding his club a striker, centre half and a decent fookin keeper to complement his excellent array of midfielders. Might just win something if he did. |
|
|
|
Post by onionman on Jan 23, 2014 13:02:12 GMT
Hopefully Mourinho has the good sense to insert a clause allowing Mata to return to Chelsea for a one-off game on March 22, the day they play Arsenal.
|
|
|
|
Post by hollybush on Jan 23, 2014 13:11:01 GMT
The simplest way to deal with Mr Wenger's the cunt's problems is to insert a clause into all contracts clubs have with the Premier League to the effect that, in any game involving Arsenal, Mr Wenger the cunt should be in charge of picking both teams. Unfortunately, his shower of whinging bottle merchants probably still wouldn't win anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stoke711 on Jan 23, 2014 13:11:41 GMT
Chelsea shouldn't be allowed to sell Mata to Manure as they are only doing it to hurt his teams challenge for honours. Apparently it isn't fair to Arsenal, its fans or other fans because it goes against the integrity of the competition. What a tool. Ban throw ins to stop little old Stoke bullying and beating his team of calcium deficient surrender monkeys and now this! What an arse! He really is something, I'm sure Mourinho is thinking who can I sell Mata to, just so they can take points off Arsenal. Arsenal & Arsene deserve each other, both complete arses |
|
|
|
Post by mrred on Jan 23, 2014 13:24:06 GMT
Hopefully Arsenal will suffer the same downward spiral, or more as United when Wenger buggers off.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokiejoe on Jan 23, 2014 13:27:51 GMT
can't. stand Arsenal, can't stand Wenger,
sadly still think he is the best Premier League manager. Look at all the players he has brought through and sold on while staying at at the top level.
I also think it would be less fun without him.
I've. got me tin hat on.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jan 23, 2014 13:28:48 GMT
I think he has a point in that it might hurt Chelseas rivals (as Chelsea have played The Shit twice already) this season but it's tough titty really.
No doubt Mata,Van Persie & Rooney will all play at Stoke next home game.
Perhaps we should complain too?
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jan 23, 2014 13:31:47 GMT
this could apply to every transfer between premier league clubs
he really is a tool
|
|
|
|
Post by Godo on Jan 23, 2014 13:32:58 GMT
The silly old sod's paranoia only adds to Arsenal's sense that they won't/can't win the league which with wankers like Wenger, Ramsay and Wilshire at the club is fine by me.......oh and death to Alan Davies as well!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 13:36:21 GMT
His argument is that Chelsea have played Man United twice this season so it's unfair that Mata won't have to play against Chelsea but can face Arsenal in 2013/14. Yeah, the bloke is an arse. Mata was an unused sub in both games against Man Utd this season. I can't work it out. Does this make his argument more bonkers, or less?  |
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Jan 23, 2014 13:38:46 GMT
I think he has a point.
Is there a rule that could stop a club loaning out a load of players (Man City for eg) to smaller clubs in a bid that they are more likely to take points off the other big boys?
|
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Jan 23, 2014 13:42:18 GMT
He will never have a point.
I loathe the fucking prick.
Rage over.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 13:44:24 GMT
I heard on the wireless yesterday that they were saying what a clever move it was, Chelsea get the best bit of 40 mil for him and he doesn't have to play against them til next season, therefore all he is likely to do is improve utd (not enough to make them win the league) but maybe help them to take points off the other teams around Chelsea! very clever! Makes sense, even with Mata, Utd's squad pales in comparison to the likes of Man City and Chelsea. £35m + for a player who can't make the team and could possibly help take points off rivals makes complete sense. As for Wenger, tough shit! |
|
|
|
Post by StokieAsh13 on Jan 23, 2014 13:45:28 GMT
can't. stand Arsenal, can't stand Wenger, sadly still think he is the best Premier League manager. Look at all the players he has brought through and sold on while staying at at the top level. I also think it would be less fun without him. I've. got me tin hat on. Yeah players wise he has done well, but I cant agree he is the best in the league, that goes to Mourinho. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 13:49:05 GMT
Phil McNulty sums it up perfectly on www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25854919"It is difficult to remove mischief from any Mourinho equation but the brutal, simple logic is that he may regard this as getting a huge sum of money from a club he does not regard as title rivals for a player he does not need." |
|
|
|
Post by stokiejoe on Jan 23, 2014 13:50:49 GMT
can't. stand Arsenal, can't stand Wenger, sadly still think he is the best Premier League manager. Look at all the players he has brought through and sold on while staying at at the top level. I also think it would be less fun without him. I've. got me tin hat on. Yeah players wise he has done well, but I cant agree he is the best in the league, that goes to Mourinho. Arsehole has done it year in year out for quite. a few years. Not seen Mourinho when the going has got tough. |
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 23, 2014 13:51:34 GMT
I think he has a point. Is there a rule that could stop a club loaning out a load of players (Man City for eg) to smaller clubs in a bid that they are more likely to take points off the other big boys? I guess the rule that only allows 2 domestic loan players to feature in any Premier League squad prevents the scenario you suggest! :-) |
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Jan 23, 2014 13:55:12 GMT
I think he has a point. Is there a rule that could stop a club loaning out a load of players (Man City for eg) to smaller clubs in a bid that they are more likely to take points off the other big boys? I guess the rule that only allows 2 domestic loan players to feature in any Premier League squad prevents the scenario you suggest! :-) But they could loan out 2 players per lower prem team. That could help a bit surely? H |
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 23, 2014 14:03:30 GMT
Indeed they could RAF! Indeed they could.
|
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Jan 23, 2014 14:09:36 GMT
In which case....he has a point.
What you are basically saying is that you are going to ignore it though because he's a moaning cunt.
|
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Jan 23, 2014 14:11:44 GMT
In which case....he has a point. What you are basically saying is that are going to ignore it though because he's a moaning cunt. Fuck all to do with him moaning. H |
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Jan 23, 2014 14:14:42 GMT
I wasn't talking to you knobby
|
|
