|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 13:14:29 GMT
"Chairman Mehmet Dalman has a preferred candidate to succeed the 41-year-old and Tan's permission to strike a deal. The target is understood to be a household name at another British club. " www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25464611He'd have to want a move away from where ever he is a great deal to work for this idiot
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Dec 20, 2013 13:22:50 GMT
"Chairman Mehmet Dalman has a preferred candidate to succeed the 41-year-old and Tan's permission to strike a deal. The target is understood to be a household name at another British club. " www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25464611He'd have to want a move away from where ever he is a great deal to work for this idiot There's a few household names on this list.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 20, 2013 13:25:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 13:29:12 GMT
Is Hughes a household name? Mr Joorabchian been doing a bit of stirring? Three Welsh lads to return home?
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Dec 20, 2013 13:33:25 GMT
So who is the most mercenary? Vural is hardly a "household name".
|
|
|
Post by itsmorethanagame on Dec 20, 2013 13:34:31 GMT
Is Hughes a household name? Mr Joorabchian being doing a bit of stirring? Three Welsh lads to return home? Look, Tan might be a complete and utter head case who is self destructing the club BUT EVEN HE (!) wouldn't be that mad as to gofor Hughes would he!!!? (winky face)
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Dec 20, 2013 13:43:42 GMT
I'd fucking love it if they well and truly self-destruct. Is Sam Hamman still there? Am I right in thinking he had something to do with bringing Tan to the club?
Go and pat you fucking head in the Conference ya bellend.
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Dec 20, 2013 13:52:09 GMT
Hope Malky takes him for every penny, in general I love that the greedy fuckwits like Tan and the Venkys are getting ruined by their own half witted arrogance, long may it continue - also am delighted Tan has just signed Cardiff's death warrant and hopefully saved us from relegation.
Malky to West Brazil now yes?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 14:13:17 GMT
"Chairman Mehmet Dalman has a preferred candidate to succeed the 41-year-old and Tan's permission to strike a deal. The target is understood to be a household name at another British club. " www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25464611He'd have to want a move away from where ever he is a great deal to work for this idiot There's a few household names on this list.Reading the article again , and looking at the list. * At a British Club (not just English) Most on the betting list aren't at a British club (indeed, most aren't at any club!). *Household name Surely Lennon isn't that fed up of winning everything!!? Harry Rednapp would be another candidate (and is always up for a payout after getting sacked). After that its all basically out of workers and the usual suspects. Of course, there's identifying a preferred candidate and then there's employing him; so hopefully there's still a chance it could be Gary McAllister (50:1) Baaaarrrdddiiffff, funnier than Fail
|
|
|
Post by jonnybigpotatoes on Dec 20, 2013 14:13:53 GMT
Mr Tan looks fairly serious...
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Dec 20, 2013 14:24:52 GMT
With the way that twat is running Cardiff and completely going all out to be rid of a decent manager like Mackay, it makes me realise how lucky we are too have a Chairman that actually loves and understands the club. Agreed. The one thing you can't accuse owners like Peter Coates of, is a lack of understanding for the game, or love for the club he has supported since he was a boy. One thing the owners of Hull and Cardiff have in common is that they, unlike PC, never stood on the terraces of their clubs as children. If they had done, they would be less likely to trample on tradition or assume they knew better than both the fans and the manager. Tradition such as selling shares for a Pound ? Or how about forcing Lou to sell Peschisoldio rather than sell his only left back Sandford maybe you should change your post to you can't accuse Coates Mk II of
|
|
|
Post by RichieBarkerOut! on Dec 20, 2013 14:35:07 GMT
Joe Kinnear was mentioned earlier, partly in jest, but if there's a chance that Joe and Tan have spent time with each other in the same room, then it would not surprise me at all if Tan thinks Joe is the next messiah.
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 20, 2013 14:38:11 GMT
I'd support the Dingles if they played Cardiff. Wash your mouth out son TWD I just dislike Cardiff more.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 14:39:12 GMT
Reading the article again , and looking at the list. * At a British Club (not just English) Most on the betting list aren't at a British club (indeed, most aren't at any club!). *Household name Surely Lennon isn't that fed up of winning everything!!? Harry Rednapp would be another candidate (and is always up for a payout after getting sacked). After that its all basically out of workers and the usual suspects. Of course, there's identifying a preferred candidate and then there's employing him; so hopefully there's still a chance it could be Gary McAllister (50:1) Baaaarrrdddiiffff, funnier than Fail can't see it being Harry, on talksport this morning they were saying he's on over £2mill a year at QPR (more than joachim Loew and Del bosque and only a few hundred grand short of Woy). that said, they'll have to pay anyone shitloads for them to agree to go there after this farce
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 14:46:12 GMT
"Recently, his name was given to a street in Adapazar?, where he was born and grown , in accordance with a local municipality project." I'm not sure I like the sound of this municipality project.
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Dec 20, 2013 14:56:45 GMT
According to the betting Solskjaar (sp) is 2-1 on. Second fav is Dave Jones at 14-1 so read into that what you will (I got this off Talksport at lunch so dont shoot me it its wrong)
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Dec 20, 2013 15:00:31 GMT
Reading the article again , and looking at the list. * At a British Club (not just English) Most on the betting list aren't at a British club (indeed, most aren't at any club!). *Household name Surely Lennon isn't that fed up of winning everything!!? Harry Rednapp would be another candidate (and is always up for a payout after getting sacked). After that its all basically out of workers and the usual suspects. Of course, there's identifying a preferred candidate and then there's employing him; so hopefully there's still a chance it could be Gary McAllister (50:1) Baaaarrrdddiiffff, funnier than Fail can't see it being Harry, on talksport this morning they were saying he's on over £2mill a year at QPR (more than joachim Loew and Del bosque and only a few hundred grand short of Woy). that said, they'll have to pay anyone shitloads for them to agree to go there after this farce Mick McCarthy Household name [tick] British club [tick] Mercenary [??] 66/1
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 15:02:05 GMT
can't see it being Harry, on talksport this morning they were saying he's on over £2mill a year at QPR (more than joachim Loew and Del bosque and only a few hundred grand short of Woy). that said, they'll have to pay anyone shitloads for them to agree to go there after this farce Mick McCarthy Household name [tick] British club [tick] Mercenary [??] 66/1 idiotic and mad as a march hare enough to take on any bloody job offered him? [massive fook off tick]
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 15:10:37 GMT
Wash your mouth out son TWD I just dislike Cardiff more. Wouldn't you feel soiled and violated ? TWD
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 20, 2013 15:17:37 GMT
I just dislike Cardiff more. Wouldn't you feel soiled and violated ? TWD Not really. At least Wolves are English. Plus the other half's a Dingle and it's she who gets soiled and violated
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 15:31:05 GMT
Wouldn't you feel soiled and violated ? TWD Not really. At least Wolves are English. Plus the other half's a Dingle and it's she who gets soiled and violated Ahhh, Correct treatment for a Dingle though TWD
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Dec 20, 2013 15:44:02 GMT
Agreed. The one thing you can't accuse owners like Peter Coates of, is a lack of understanding for the game, or love for the club he has supported since he was a boy. One thing the owners of Hull and Cardiff have in common is that they, unlike PC, never stood on the terraces of their clubs as children. If they had done, they would be less likely to trample on tradition or assume they knew better than both the fans and the manager. Tradition such as selling shares for a Pound ? Or how about forcing Lou to sell Peschisoldio rather than sell his only left back Sandford maybe you should change your post to you can't accuse Coates Mk II of I find the idea of keeping shares in a Premier League club valued at £1 quite amusing. Given that our income this season will be over 8x what it was in our promotion season and, maybe 20x what it was when Coates first bought the club, quite why anyone would think that the club should be valued at what it was in those days really does make me smile. I remember when shares in clubs like Stoke were fixed in number and were, as you say, traditionally valued at £1. But it would make little sense these days for anyone to be able to buy a club for a few hundred thousand pounds when even a smallish Premier League club has an annual income of £90 million and a wage bill of £54 million.
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Dec 20, 2013 15:45:23 GMT
can't see it being Harry, on talksport this morning they were saying he's on over £2mill a year at QPR (more than joachim Loew and Del bosque and only a few hundred grand short of Woy). that said, they'll have to pay anyone shitloads for them to agree to go there after this farce Mick McCarthy Household name [tick] British club [tick] Mercenary [??] 66/1 Mark Hughes. Household name [tick] British club [tick] Mercenary [tick]
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 16:08:20 GMT
Mick McCarthy Household name [tick] British club [tick] Mercenary [??] 66/1 Mark Hughes. Household name [tick] British club [tick] Mercenary [tick]
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 16:10:35 GMT
Tradition such as selling shares for a Pound ? Or how about forcing Lou to sell Peschisoldio rather than sell his only left back Sandford maybe you should change your post to you can't accuse Coates Mk II of I find the idea of keeping shares in a Premier League club valued at £1 quite amusing. Given that our income this season will be over 8x what it was in our promotion season and, maybe 20x what it was when Coates first bought the club, quite why anyone would think that the club should be valued at what it was in those days really does make me smile. I remember when shares in clubs like Stoke were fixed in number and were, as you say, traditionally valued at £1. But it would make little sense these days for anyone to be able to buy a club for a few hundred thousand pounds when even a smallish Premier League club has an annual income of £90 million and a wage bill of £54 million. to be fair though, the reason they changed the colour of their shirts and the nickame to the "Dragons" was precisely because they felt it would appeal more to the internaional market and therefore increase the value of the club in the global market. so why was it ok for us but not for them?
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Dec 20, 2013 16:15:29 GMT
I find the idea of keeping shares in a Premier League club valued at £1 quite amusing. Given that our income this season will be over 8x what it was in our promotion season and, maybe 20x what it was when Coates first bought the club, quite why anyone would think that the club should be valued at what it was in those days really does make me smile. I remember when shares in clubs like Stoke were fixed in number and were, as you say, traditionally valued at £1. But it would make little sense these days for anyone to be able to buy a club for a few hundred thousand pounds when even a smallish Premier League club has an annual income of £90 million and a wage bill of £54 million. to be fair though, the reason they changed the colour of their shirts and the nickame to the "Dragons" was precisely because they felt it would appeal more to the internaional market and therefore increase the value of the club in the global market. so why was it ok for us but not for them? When did we change our shirt colour and our name to increase the value of the club in the International Market?
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Dec 20, 2013 16:20:45 GMT
to be fair though, the reason they changed the colour of their shirts and the nickame to the "Dragons" was precisely because they felt it would appeal more to the internaional market and therefore increase the value of the club in the global market. so why was it ok for us but not for them? When did we change our shirt colour and our name to increase the value of the club in the International Market? You're clearly not a proper Stoke Spitfires fan. When our boys run in green and orange hoops, the real fans are there for them. Hang your head in shame.
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Dec 20, 2013 16:23:34 GMT
When did we change our shirt colour and our name to increase the value of the club in the International Market? You're clearly not a proper Stoke Spitfires fan. When our boys run in green and orange hoops, the real fans are there for them. Hang your head in shame. True - but I do like Spitfire beer!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 16:26:28 GMT
i'm not referring to us changing our shirt colours or nickname, merely that us and every other club have changed things over the years and "Trampled on tradition" because football is about money and business moves forward and if you limit yourselves to sticking to traditions you won't succeed. i don't see this however as anyone trampling on tradition....the chairman and manager don't get on, not the first time it's happened and certainly won't be the last. the only traditions that have gone by the wayside are their shirts and nickname, nothing else, and that was simply to try to improve their global appeal and therefore help them financially. i just think your post about what Coates was like in comparison to Tan is slightly OTT . we have just been very very fortunate that our chairman was a boyhood fan. that used to be commonplace decades ago but is exceedingly rare nowadays. the new breed of chairman may be less knowledgable about the game or the club but they usually know what makes money and i think that after an initial period of fans frothing at the mouth, once they see the financial benefits for their team they usually forget about it pretty quickly (as Cardiff fans did with the shirt colour change etc.)
let's not pretend the chairman just isn't interested in the club or the fans at all, of course he is...it's not in his financial interests to shit all over them and let them disintergrate..he's just got personal differences with the manager is all, i don't see why "Trampling over tradition" has even come into the thread really
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Dec 20, 2013 16:33:00 GMT
Mick McCarthy Household name [tick] British club [tick] Mercenary [??] 66/1 8-| Mark Hughes. Household name [tick] British club [tick] Mercenary [tick] (thumbsup)
|
|