|
Post by dadofsam on Oct 28, 2012 15:57:51 GMT
We'll see what the stats say on Monday Nige
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Oct 28, 2012 15:58:31 GMT
Again just wank yesterday,offers fuck all,creates fuck all does not score but thats his 60th consecutive start which is even more alarming!!!
Send him to fuckin wolves!
|
|
|
Post by miltonpotterfan on Oct 28, 2012 16:01:32 GMT
CHASE IT JON CHASE IT.
SHAMBLES MANAGEMENT.
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Oct 28, 2012 16:41:06 GMT
I was talking about Walters, I disagree anyone doubled up on him. I agree about Adam offering nothing H Im half agreeing with you in my head, but as in another thread on here they came to out pulis us and we found it very hard to break through,. Imo both wingers were doubled up on and no support was given. I find it terrifying that this walters witch hunt is still going on. There were alot worse on the pitch today. Let's just be glad that these loud-mouthed tits on here don't have a say in the team selection. Maybe they didn't notice that although we created a bit more when Etherington came on there was nobody to get on the end of it, Crouch had 4 defenders on him and nobody supporting him. BTW, where's the thread saying how wank Wilko is?
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Oct 28, 2012 16:45:24 GMT
Im half agreeing with you in my head, but as in another thread on here they came to out pulis us and we found it very hard to break through,. Imo both wingers were doubled up on and no support was given. I find it terrifying that this walters witch hunt is still going on. There were alot worse on the pitch today. Let's just be glad that these loud-mouthed tits on here don't have a say in the team selection. Maybe they didn't notice that although we created a bit more when Etherington came on there was nobody to get on the end of it, Crouch had 4 defenders on him and nobody supporting him. BTW, where's the thread saying how wank Wilko is? There are several posts saying how poor Wilko was. Not that you would know as you would still be dreaming about Crouch being marked by 4 men! Clearly at a different game and on a different planet as usual Shitty! H
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Oct 28, 2012 16:49:40 GMT
Im half agreeing with you in my head, but as in another thread on here they came to out pulis us and we found it very hard to break through,. Imo both wingers were doubled up on and no support was given. I find it terrifying that this walters witch hunt is still going on. There were alot worse on the pitch today. Let's just be glad that these loud-mouthed tits on here don't have a say in the team selection. Maybe they didn't notice that although we created a bit more when Etherington came on there was nobody to get on the end of it, Crouch had 4 defenders on him and nobody supporting him. BTW, where's the thread saying how wank Wilko is? Just so I'm sure, are you suggesting by playing Jon wide right meant their centre halves were drawn to the flank? Honestly?
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Oct 28, 2012 16:53:10 GMT
Let's just be glad that these loud-mouthed tits on here don't have a say in the team selection. Maybe they didn't notice that although we created a bit more when Etherington came on there was nobody to get on the end of it, Crouch had 4 defenders on him and nobody supporting him. BTW, where's the thread saying how wank Wilko is? Just so I'm sure, are you suggesting by playing Jon wide right meant their centre halves were drawn to the flank? Honestly? No, what I am suggesting is that when Walters went off we had nobody to support Crouch when he had the ball.
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Oct 28, 2012 16:57:02 GMT
Just so I'm sure, are you suggesting by playing Jon wide right meant their centre halves were drawn to the flank? Honestly? No, what I am suggesting is that when Walters went off we had nobody to support Crouch when he had the ball. Walters didn't support Crouch though. We had age old issue that no fucker got near the big man bar the odd moment here and there. Jon played wide right and didn't offer us anything really. That's more down to Tone playing him there but there's no point leaving Matty out to accommodate Jon in a wide area at home and against the divisions middle of the road clubs.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Oct 28, 2012 16:59:35 GMT
No, what I am suggesting is that when Walters went off we had nobody to support Crouch when he had the ball. Walters didn't support Crouch though. We had age old issue that no fucker got near the big man bar the odd moment here and there. Jon played wide right and didn't offer us anything really. That's more down to Tone playing him there but there's no point leaving Matty out to accommodate Jon in a wide area at home and against the divisions middle of the road clubs. You are talking to someone who watched a match yesterday where 4 defenders were ON Crouch! Different planet Jamo. H
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Oct 28, 2012 17:02:43 GMT
Walters didn't support Crouch though. We had age old issue that no fucker got near the big man bar the odd moment here and there. Jon played wide right and didn't offer us anything really. That's more down to Tone playing him there but there's no point leaving Matty out to accommodate Jon in a wide area at home and against the divisions middle of the road clubs. You are talking to someone who watched a match yesterday where 4 defenders were ON Crouch! Different planet Jamo. H I can't be arsed to reply to you and your bigoted opinions.
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on Oct 28, 2012 17:04:13 GMT
RAF a bigot? Never
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Oct 28, 2012 17:04:48 GMT
But yet you did. Go and have a little cry in the corner about it sonny!
H
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Oct 28, 2012 17:05:52 GMT
RAF a bigot? Never Vale fan like a tramp on a bag of chips, its no wonder even admin call you Jokelad is it ? H
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on Oct 28, 2012 17:07:18 GMT
Admin are biased. So I don't really care what they say
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Oct 28, 2012 17:10:21 GMT
No, what I am suggesting is that when Walters went off we had nobody to support Crouch when he had the ball. Walters didn't support Crouch though. We had age old issue that no fucker got near the big man bar the odd moment here and there. Jon played wide right and didn't offer us anything really. That's more down to Tone playing him there but there's no point leaving Matty out to accommodate Jon in a wide area at home and against the divisions middle of the road clubs. He offered more support than anybody else, and to single him out as the worst player in our side, when there were and are many who far from the footballer he is, is totally unjustified. Etherington could have put crosses in al.l afternoon but there was nobody to finish them, despite what somebody else says there were many occasions when Crouch had the ball with nobody to pass to and a row of 4 defenders in front of him.
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Oct 28, 2012 17:12:29 GMT
But yet you did. Go and have a little cry in the corner about it sonny! H SONNY, IF WE EVER MET THERE'D ONLY BE ONE OF US CRYING AND IT WOULDN'T BE ME.
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Oct 28, 2012 17:28:10 GMT
Walters didn't support Crouch though. We had age old issue that no fucker got near the big man bar the odd moment here and there. Jon played wide right and didn't offer us anything really. That's more down to Tone playing him there but there's no point leaving Matty out to accommodate Jon in a wide area at home and against the divisions middle of the road clubs. He offered more support than anybody else, and to single him out as the worst player in our side, when there were and are many who far from the footballer he is, is totally unjustified. Etherington could have put crosses in al.l afternoon but there was nobody to finish them, despite what somebody else says there were many occasions when Crouch had the ball with nobody to pass to and a row of 4 defenders in front of him. Just so you know, I haven't singled him out as the worst player in our side but he is the worst option we have out wide as he can't play the role when we need to push on and attack. We picked a team that in your view was set up to fail then as Crouch was on his own from the off. Playing Walters wide doesn't mean we've got two forwards on, it just means we've got another player out of position and not offering the team very much because of it.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Oct 28, 2012 17:37:56 GMT
But yet you did. Go and have a little cry in the corner about it sonny! H SONNY, IF WE EVER MET THERE'D ONLY BE ONE OF US CRYING AND IT WOULDN'T BE ME. It's like shelling peas sonny, do you walk around like you have carpet rolls under your arms hero? Another knuckle dragging moron. Cant say im surprised with your limited vocabulary. Anyway I thought you couldnt be bothered to respond to me? I shall put Liar as another one of your qualities. H
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on Oct 28, 2012 18:01:08 GMT
Ignore him shifty.
Admin will just ban you for disagreeing with one of their mates.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Oct 28, 2012 18:03:20 GMT
Ignore him shifty. Admin will just ban you for disagreeing with one of their mates. Either that or call you a Joke like the Vale dunce above! Either or is good. H
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Oct 28, 2012 18:37:40 GMT
SONNY, IF WE EVER MET THERE'D ONLY BE ONE OF US CRYING AND IT WOULDN'T BE ME. It's like shelling peas sonny, do you walk around like you have carpet rolls under your arms hero? Another knuckle dragging moron. Cant say im surprised with your limited vocabulary. Anyway I thought you couldnt be bothered to respond to me? I shall put Liar as another one of your qualities. H Talking of vocabulary, let's add grammar, you should have added a comma between arms and hero. Also, there's nothing wrong with my vocabulary unlike your eyesight, although I suspect it's not a case of being unable to see and more of not wanting to see. As for those carpets, it's a real pity you can't see for yourself.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Oct 28, 2012 18:45:36 GMT
It's like shelling peas sonny, do you walk around like you have carpet rolls under your arms hero? Another knuckle dragging moron. Cant say im surprised with your limited vocabulary. Anyway I thought you couldnt be bothered to respond to me? I shall put Liar as another one of your qualities. H Talking of vocabulary, let's add grammar, you should have added a comma between arms and hero. Also, there's nothing wrong with my vocabulary unlike your eyesight, although I suspect it's not a case of being unable to see and more of not wanting to see. As for those carpets, it's a real pity you can't see for yourself. Perhaps you can have a little cry about it with Jokelad. I'm sure he would like to see your carpets sonny boy. H
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Oct 28, 2012 18:47:15 GMT
Talking of vocabulary, let's add grammar, you should have added a comma between arms and hero. Also, there's nothing wrong with my vocabulary unlike your eyesight, although I suspect it's not a case of being unable to see and more of not wanting to see. As for those carpets, it's a real pity you can't see for yourself. Perhaps you can have a little cry about it with Jokelad. I'm sure he would like to see your carpets sonny boy. H
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Oct 28, 2012 18:53:40 GMT
I suppose for you and your eyesight it will be a pleasure coupling with Jokelad as you will no doubt think there is four of him.
H
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Oct 28, 2012 18:56:14 GMT
He offered more support than anybody else, and to single him out as the worst player in our side, when there were and are many who far from the footballer he is, is totally unjustified. Etherington could have put crosses in al.l afternoon but there was nobody to finish them, despite what somebody else says there were many occasions when Crouch had the ball with nobody to pass to and a row of 4 defenders in front of him. Just so you know, I haven't singled him out as the worst player in our side but he is the worst option we have out wide as he can't play the role when we need to push on and attack. We picked a team that in your view was set up to fail then as Crouch was on his own from the off. Playing Walters wide doesn't mean we've got two forwards on, it just means we've got another player out of position and not offering the team very much because of it. Pretty much, yes. Although like I've said he offered more in the way of support to Crouch than anybody else. I'm aware that playing Walters wide leaves us with one forward, unlike loads of those who've responded to this thread criticising his lack of goals. I agree that yesterday wasn't his greatest game in a Stoke shirt, but there again who did play well? And, it's his first bad game this season, but how people are going on you'd think that he'd been useless in every game.
|
|
|
Post by trigger on Oct 28, 2012 20:24:41 GMT
Superb four players on Crouch...we therefore have three attacking players unmarked then....
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Oct 28, 2012 21:10:18 GMT
Superb four players on Crouch...we therefore have three attacking players unmarked then.... And we still cant fuckin score!!!
|
|
|
Post by miltonpotterfan on Nov 1, 2012 11:24:02 GMT
How many goals will Tony's Golden Boy Wonder get this weekend.
|
|
|
Post by stokiekey on Nov 1, 2012 11:36:09 GMT
We'll always find something moan about won't we. Well some anyway. Miserable so & so's. This is why I don't really look on here anymore it's just full of muppets who should be taking anti-depressants.
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Nov 1, 2012 21:26:22 GMT
On the Knots fm interview perhaps im reading to much into it..but he singles out Kightly and Adam as players who are offering us quality but said nothing of Walters. I really think theres a chance TP might actually drop JW on Saturday.
|
|