|
Post by Titan Uranus on Apr 11, 2008 21:20:01 GMT
please yourself pal
I would like bet that next time Tone goes knocking on Hughes' door it will be a different reception
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2008 21:21:44 GMT
Didn't he actually finish higher than TP had the season before? awww crap I hate defending Boskamp! He was wank too! They're both wank, now grow up!
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Apr 11, 2008 21:25:54 GMT
Broomes under two seasons has been kept on the books by Pulis? Whats that about and he signed Buxton and gave him a new deal but these were in the side that was going adrift,knowhere under Bossie! All of a sudden they are world class talents that should stay a part of 'Tonys Men'!!! Double fuckin standards or what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Apr 11, 2008 22:34:11 GMT
Has Broomes signed a new deal?
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Apr 11, 2008 23:26:38 GMT
"Last time he was here the club was going nowhere so he was probably the top player here."
If the club was going nowhere, it was either because the previous incumbent deliberately sabotaged the previous season, or was truly incapable.
Also, it is not the quality of the players in the squad that make a player a 'top player' but how they perform against the opposition.
|
|
|
Post by spiderpig on Apr 12, 2008 0:43:32 GMT
Which ever way you look at that, that is a fucking ridiculous thing to say. Parkin, Griffin, Pericard, Diao, Matteo - the list goes on. Pulis has done well to get us where we are but the fact is he is eminently unlikeable. How the hell can you include Griffin in that list? I've seen him make one mistake and that was on Monday. He was slated for the Sheffield goal but having watched it a number of times it was no way his fault. The only blame if Griffin isn't playing 100% should go to the manager because he's playing right back after all that great work at left back last season. Give the guy a break FFS!!!
|
|
|
Post by kinnell on Apr 12, 2008 11:07:42 GMT
Respectful? Oh yes...with the players HE'S signed but vicious and peevish in laying into players associated with that'going nowhere' previous management. Odious is the word.
|
|
|
Post by headsgoup on Apr 12, 2008 18:43:18 GMT
Not moaning so much now you Pulis hating wankstains!
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Apr 13, 2008 13:25:14 GMT
You won't get a response Heads, Hudson's internet seems to break down for around a week after every good result. It's uncanny.
|
|
|
Post by craig67 on Apr 13, 2008 13:29:15 GMT
Hardly set Preston alight,did he?Perhaps he is happy to pick up his Premiership wages every week and not actually put in too much work.Has anyone ever considered that?Perhaps thats why Blackburn are happy to loan him out,and then not play him when he goes back?
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Apr 13, 2008 14:36:35 GMT
I'm still moaning. Tony Pulis - decent manager, complete cunt. Let's hope he gets us up and he'll deserve full credit, but don't expect me to ever like the lying odious shitbag.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Apr 13, 2008 14:41:17 GMT
Has naughty Tony had a little go at Bossie and the Icelanders, GM?
The horrid boy.
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Apr 13, 2008 14:45:44 GMT
Has naughty Tony had a little go at Bossie and the Icelanders, GM? The horrid boy. I don't mind him doing that, but he seems only to do it when we go through a bad patch, like a bad politician deflecting away criticism by pointing the the prior administrations folly's.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Apr 13, 2008 14:51:16 GMT
It seems in the make up of a lot of football managers. Wenger for instance over the past couple of years has shown himself to be a vile blame shifting arsewipe bad loser who contradicts himself often in the same sentence. Holloway, Warnock and several others in our own league show similar traits. Of course when Tone does it, we get meaningless and misused words like odious thrown about, by people who should know better.
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Apr 13, 2008 14:53:19 GMT
Has naughty Tony had a little go at Bossie and the Icelanders, GM? The horrid boy. I don't mind him doing that, but he seems only to do it when we go through a bad patch, like a bad politician deflecting away criticism by pointing the the prior administrations folly's. Thing is Serpico, whilst some people are still daft enough to fall for it, he'll continue to do it. There are some people for who Tony Pulis could break into their house whilst they were at the pub, and shit in their airing copboard, and they'd still somehow manage to turn it into the act of a tortured genius. Waste of time having the debate.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Apr 13, 2008 14:56:01 GMT
Has naughty Tony had a little go at Bossie and the Icelanders, GM? The horrid boy. I don't mind him doing that, but he seems only to do it when we go through a bad patch, like a bad politician deflecting away criticism by pointing the the prior administrations folly's. Do you think uncle Peter paid all that money to the Labour Party for nowt?
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Apr 13, 2008 14:56:23 GMT
It's not really a debate though is it. It's a collection of the misguided and the moronic crying like fucking babies at everything he says.
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Apr 13, 2008 15:01:45 GMT
Momo - it swings both ways matey. There are folk who will never be happy with him, and folk who can never be disappointed by him. For me, it's a shame that he's had a go at Gallagher, rather than the previous manager or chairman. He does seem to single folk out when things are going badly. His treatment of Hoefkens was nothing to be proud of, and he should have dealt with Gally behind closed doors. Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This o·di·ous Audio Help /ˈoʊdiəs/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[oh-dee-uhs] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –adjective 1. deserving or causing hatred; hateful; detestable. 2. highly offensive; repugnant; disgusting. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Origin: 1350–1400; ME < L odiôsus, equiv. to od(ium) hatred, odium + -ôsus -ous] —Related forms o·di·ous·ly, adverb o·di·ous·ness, noun Odious might be a bit OTT - but he still arouses these sentiments in some of the support! Doubt he or most of us really gives a toss as long as we go up.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Apr 13, 2008 15:14:48 GMT
A bit OTT What is it he's done exactly, I've never had anything approaching a coherent answer. He pissed of a crook called Scally and did fairly wank jobs at Bristol City and Portsmouth. So far, so fuck all to do with me or Stoke City. He comes in and keeps us up before backing the Coates horse in the boardroom and serving up some dismal fayre which he apologises for. He then goes and does a reasonable job at Plymouth before coming back here to work with seemingly the only wealthy man on the planet with a realistic chance of bank rolling us forward and he looks like delivering on it. Have I missed out the 'disgusting, repugnant and detestable, behaviour? Was I having a sleep?
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Apr 14, 2008 7:20:32 GMT
Obviously. Pulis would do himself a favour by remembering times when he tried to stir the shit at a club I support with a bloke he knew nothing about who had done him no harm. So he's done a good job. Why are we expected to like him as well?
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Apr 14, 2008 7:29:08 GMT
No grey man We expect that people to travel to Belgium to support a bloke who did fuck all apart from not speak to his colleagues for a few months.
|
|