|
|
Post by padders01 on Dec 5, 2009 23:12:19 GMT
First one went to close down Arshavin, then didn't track him when he went past and the second one again went to close down Arshavin, leaving a masive gap behind.
Hope Ryan is back next week
|
|
|
|
Post by BoxxyTheLost on Dec 5, 2009 23:13:49 GMT
right sure he was.
|
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Dec 5, 2009 23:14:53 GMT
Weak for the second i thought but need see it on the tv.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ron Jeremy on Dec 5, 2009 23:14:56 GMT
First one he wasnt at fault, he kept on a man to mark him, didnt want to close him down else he could of easily passed and scored
|
|
|
|
Post by rigsby on Dec 5, 2009 23:15:43 GMT
He also dived in too early to present Arshavin with an early chance which Sorro smothered.
|
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Dec 5, 2009 23:16:44 GMT
I am not convinced by Huth to date.
He is too cynical for my liking, goes to ground far too easily, doesn't strike me as being particularly mobile and isn't a patch on Ryan.
The jury is still out on him as far as I am concerned.
|
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Dec 5, 2009 23:18:21 GMT
He also dived in too early to present Arshavin with an early chance which Sorro smothered. Yeah i thought that. No doubting Arshavin is a world class player but still he made Huth loook very very average  |
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Dec 5, 2009 23:20:35 GMT
The sheer amount of attacks they had meant someone was bound to make a mistake sooner or later, it's the law of averages.
We did ok today, just have to admit Arsenal are a fantastic team and can open up the best teams in the world like a can of beans.
|
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Dec 5, 2009 23:22:16 GMT
Yeah fair enough Serpico
|
|
|
|
Post by Ron Jeremy on Dec 5, 2009 23:26:38 GMT
The sheer amount of attacks they had meant someone was bound to make a mistake sooner or later, it's the law of averages. We did ok today, just have to admit Arsenal are a fantastic team and can open up the best teams in the world like a can of beans. Spot on, Fabregas, Arshavin etc could make any defender look at fault |
|
|
|
Post by chiswickpotter on Dec 5, 2009 23:27:16 GMT
first goal Faye was drawn out and Wilko was awol. Second, Huth was right to go for the ball and won it, where was the midfielder tracking Ramsey and why was Collins so slow to react
|
|
|
|
Post by DelapsWankingArm on Dec 5, 2009 23:29:00 GMT
First goal was Wilkos' fault.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 5, 2009 23:30:41 GMT
first goal Faye was drawn out and Wilko was awol. Second, Huth was right to go for the ball and won it, where was the midfielder tracking Ramsey and why was Collins so slow to react Huth for the second was weak in the tackle imo and should have cleared the player and ball out properly. |
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Dec 5, 2009 23:30:58 GMT
Not a chance wankingarm.
Arshavin lost the centre half and Wilko couldn't get back to him. He could have brought him down but would have been sent off.
Arshavin was just too good today and led our centre halves a merry dance. Both were rubbish and Huth was at fault for both goals.
|
|
Bamford
Youth Player
heeeyy peter hoekstra....
Posts: 478
|
Post by Bamford on Dec 5, 2009 23:31:33 GMT
I dont think theres many CB's that can deal with arshavin on form
|
|
|
|
Post by neoisd1 on Dec 5, 2009 23:33:20 GMT
I'm blaming Huth for them both. He was shit today, just hope that Ryan is back for the Wigan game and Wilko keeps his place.
|
|
|
|
Post by BoxxyTheLost on Dec 5, 2009 23:34:51 GMT
Not a chance wankingarm. Arshavin lost the centre half and Wilko couldn't get back to him. He could have brought him down but would have been sent off. i think that is just about all the proof that is needed of the way wilko has improved especially in experience since this time last season. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Dec 6, 2009 0:06:11 GMT
First goal was Wilkos' fault. It wasn't mate, Wilko attempted to cover for Huth who had lost his man. |
|
|
|
Post by StoKeith on Dec 6, 2009 0:24:19 GMT
I thought Huth was unfortunate for the second. Also, Abdy's hesitation allowed Ramsay the space to shoot. He should have closed him down immediately as Wilko had the player behind him marked.
|
|
|
|
Post by DelapsWankingArm on Dec 6, 2009 0:48:40 GMT
Not a chance wankingarm. Arshavin lost the centre half and Wilko couldn't get back to him. He could have brought him down but would have been sent off. Arshavin was just too good today and led our centre halves a merry dance. Both were rubbish and Huth was at fault for both goals. Wilko was the wrong side of Arshavin, also Abdy was closer to Wilko than Huth was. |
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Dec 6, 2009 1:39:06 GMT
First one he wasnt at fault, he kept on a man to mark him, didnt want to close him down else he could of easily passed and scored Of course he was at fault for the first as he was with Arshavin when he made his first run then decides to leave him as he went again when he got the ball as that was the obvious pass to him as Huth did not follow his 2nd run which obviously then creates a massive problem..Er a goal! MOTD showed a few clips on Huth how slow weak and poor positioning he was all afternoon. He needs to improve and im sure he will. |
|
|
|
Post by soicowboy2 on Dec 6, 2009 7:51:01 GMT
With Serpico on this-they'll get past any defence several times in one game so wrong to nit-pick but if anyone was ti blame for the first was Wilko but harsh. Thought the second we failed to close down full stop and was a soft one to concede considering how well we had done so previously. Look at for instance Fabregas' goal v Spurs. He beat half their team.
|
|
|
|
Post by Winge on Dec 6, 2009 9:02:38 GMT
First one he wasnt at fault, he kept on a man to mark him, didnt want to close him down else he could of easily passed and scored Of course he was at fault for the first as he was with Arshavin when he made his first run then decides to leave him as he went again when he got the ball as that was the obvious pass to him as Huth did not follow his 2nd run which obviously then creates a massive problem..Er a goal! MOTD showed a few clips on Huth how slow weak and poor positioning he was all afternoon. He needs to improve and im sure he will. Totally agree ... well said ... hopefully Shawcross will be back with AB next week and he drops Huth! |
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Dec 6, 2009 9:06:29 GMT
First goal was Wilkos' fault. Yeah it was more Wilko than Huth but as mentioned it was a matter of when not if. |
|
|
|
Post by ohhgeorgieberry on Dec 6, 2009 9:28:14 GMT
the first goal was wilkofault so get him out of the team the second was collins fault but any one can make a mistake hes only human un lucky lad
|
|
|
|
Post by rabbigan on Dec 6, 2009 9:43:41 GMT
Arshavin was world class but showed Huth for what he is no better than Cort. Very average centre back.
On the other hand I thought Collins did well today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Dec 6, 2009 11:11:25 GMT
First goal was Wilkos' fault. When Fabregas had possession, Wilko was to drawn to the Arsenal player hugging the left touchline. Huth went to Arshavin and then left him allowing him to get in behind him. Wilko was then forced to come inside to try and challenge Arshavin. Had Fabregas played the ball out wide and Wilko had been too far inside watching Arshavin and a goal had resulted then he'd have been blamed for that. He holds his position, another defender doesn't go with his player and he's blamed for that.  Like Hansen and Shearer said on MOTD last night, Arshavin was just too clever for us. He's a world class player, get over it. |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Dec 6, 2009 11:15:00 GMT
When Fabregas had possession, Wilko was to drawn to the Arsenal player hugging the left touchline. Huth went to Arshavin and then left him allowing him to get in behind him. Wilko was then forced to come inside to try and challenge Arshavin. Yep. |
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Dec 6, 2009 11:16:53 GMT
Sometimes it just comes down to being outclassed. And in that instance it was.
|
|
|
|
Post by trebor63 on Dec 6, 2009 11:18:01 GMT
First goal was Wilkos' fault. Yeah it was more Wilko than Huth but as mentioned it was a matter of when not if. Thats exactly how I saw it at the game. I haven't watched it again yet but I thought Wilko was on the wrong side of Arshavin and was left with no chance when he started his run for the goal. |
|
