|
|
Post by johnsmithsupper on Mar 26, 2009 20:01:37 GMT
Whatever he has or hasnt done since he signed we will need him back if we can recall him if mama is out for the season.
My initial thought was he cannot but wasnt riggott recalled on the day before the last game of last season.
We are bloody stupid if we havent got a recall clause.
|
|
|
|
Post by jacka118 on Mar 26, 2009 20:03:20 GMT
Whats he gonna do tho, he is worse than mama even with a dodge kneww
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2009 20:04:35 GMT
Whatever he has or hasnt done since he signed we will need him back if we can recall him if mama is out for the season. My initial thought was he cannot but wasnt riggott recalled on the day before the last game of last season. We are bloody stupid if we havent got a recall clause. I can't see them paying a hefty loan fee only for us to be able to recall him at a moment's notice to be honest. |
|
|
|
Post by johnsmithsupper on Mar 26, 2009 20:04:43 GMT
Whats he gonna do tho, he is worse than mama even with a dodge kneww He is a striker and we need four fit and firing. |
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Mar 26, 2009 20:20:45 GMT
Riggot was recalled because he was on on a normal loan?.....Any player on loan til the end of a season cannot be recalled?
Anybody remember Forsell on loan at Palace from Chelsea and half way through Palace deciced they did not want him but even if he went back to Chelsea they would not have been able to play him...Hence we cant recall Kitson..shame really
|
|
|
|
Post by grayscfc on Mar 26, 2009 20:26:34 GMT
even if we could, does anyone really think he`d put an ounce of effort in? he has openly admitted he never wanted to be here in the 1st place & now he`s back `home` he really won`t want to come back-ever.  |
|
|
|
Post by Lawto on Mar 26, 2009 20:27:36 GMT
[ He is a striker and we need four fit and firing. Beattie, Ricardo, Camara and .........................CRESSWELL!!! There's your four!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by AlanHansen on Mar 26, 2009 20:57:18 GMT
I would sooner play Cresswell than Kitson, at least he tries.
|
|
|
|
Post by sbstoke66 on Mar 26, 2009 21:17:28 GMT
I hope not!!!
Had his chances and blew them.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheWiseMaster on Mar 26, 2009 21:32:36 GMT
The loan deal is in effect a transfer to the end of the season - and thereafter if Reading are promoted
Next to no chance of him coming back
|
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Mar 26, 2009 22:01:57 GMT
The loan deal is in effect a transfer to the end of the season - and thereafter if Reading are promoted Next to no chance of him coming back Have we dropped a bollock here ? in light of Fullers shoulder injury, which was still touch and go when Kitson went, wouldn't it have been wise to put a call back clause in there ? ... now Mama is potentially out for the season, in hindsight perhaps it would have been better to keep hold of him or put a clause in |
|
|
|
Post by PickSCFC on Mar 26, 2009 22:18:37 GMT
i started a thread the same as this last week and it god wheeled for some strange reason
|
|
|
|
Post by johnsmithsupper on Mar 26, 2009 22:21:59 GMT
The loan deal is in effect a transfer to the end of the season - and thereafter if Reading are promoted Next to no chance of him coming back Have we dropped a bollock here ? in light of Fullers shoulder injury, which was still touch and go when Kitson went, wouldn't it have been wise to put a call back clause in there ? ... now Mama is potentially out for the season, in hindsight perhaps it would have been better to keep hold of him or put a clause in I dont care what anyone says about kitson I would rather have him than not if we have a couple of injuries to strikers. Stoke City, if we havent a recall clause we have made an error end of |
|
|
|
Post by johnsmithsupper on Mar 26, 2009 22:22:59 GMT
i started a thread the same as this last week and it god wheeled for some strange reason Can someone give a definitive answer please? |
|
|
|
Post by bogus on Mar 26, 2009 22:30:07 GMT
You'd have to drag Kitson back, kicking and screaming. He couldn't settle when he wanted to "give it a go". He'd be a liability if we "forced" him back now, very much against his will.
We'd be better off sticking with what we have, Camara and Cresswell as back up, or If need be, going 4-5-1 or 4-2-3-1, with someone like Lenny or whelan playing in behind Beattie/Fuller, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Done it for scfcbuxton on Mar 26, 2009 22:32:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by miffmister on Mar 27, 2009 9:17:02 GMT
We could stick shawX up front at the moment he's a better option than cressie.
|
|
|
|
Post by sweetandinnocent on Mar 27, 2009 9:40:26 GMT
i hope not  |
|
|
|
Post by th05 on Mar 27, 2009 13:49:41 GMT
Indeed, don't want him back.
|
|
|
|
Post by rhodesy on Mar 27, 2009 17:51:52 GMT
Riggot was recalled because he was on on a normal loan?.....Any player on loan til the end of a season cannot be recalled? Anybody remember Forsell on loan at Palace from Chelsea and half way through Palace deciced they did not want him but even if he went back to Chelsea they would not have been able to play him...Hence we cant recall Kitson..shame really Correct. And if you pay for a loan you cannot have a recall clause. |
|
|
|
Post by stayingupforalasrimmed on Mar 28, 2009 11:28:13 GMT
Why? Has Kitson gone somewhere? I never noticed  |
|
