|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 30, 2008 13:57:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jan 30, 2008 13:58:29 GMT
how much would they be wanting for Halmosi now that there bank balance has improved?
too much probably
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 30, 2008 14:00:42 GMT
That's ridiculous for what is in reality a run of the mill steady midfielder!
|
|
|
|
Post by Lawto on Jan 30, 2008 14:03:15 GMT
Just goes to show that our spending is not (yet) that high compared to the majority of Championship clubs.
Even Nottingham Forest have just offered £1M for Barry Robson from Dundee Utd.
|
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Jan 30, 2008 14:05:48 GMT
Seems very steep, although he is a decent Champ midfielder, not worth that though
|
|
|
|
Post by mikeyb99 on Jan 30, 2008 14:08:24 GMT
If you want the player, stump up the cash.
Wish Stoke would adopt that attitude once in a while.
(Although I wouldn't want Norris)
|
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Jan 30, 2008 14:09:24 GMT
Leeds United say hello.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikeyb99 on Jan 30, 2008 14:12:37 GMT
This issue has been flogged to death on this messageboard.
Suffice to say teams with ambition get their targets once in a while.
Griffin aside, we've signed no new players this transfer window.
|
|
|
|
Post by dexter97 on Jan 30, 2008 15:00:00 GMT
This is a perfect illustration of the point that Coates and Pulis have been making about inflation during transfer windows. A player like Norris would improve our squad, but I wouldn't be at all happy paying that much for him. Some on here were were whinging because we payed just over half that on a goal-scoring centre-half. As long as deals like this are going down, I'm not confident we'll be making any exciting permanent signings this week.  |
|
|
|
Post by smigchop on Jan 30, 2008 15:08:17 GMT
reason they want so much for him is because Bolton have a 50% sell on clause. this is why most championship clubs gave up on signing him
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jan 30, 2008 16:43:19 GMT
I'd say Norris was probably the best central midfielder available in the Championship - a bit more experienced than Whelan. Whelan should be the better buy though as his contract situation means he should go for around a quarter of the Norris fee.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2008 16:45:24 GMT
I’d pay that much for Chuck Norris
There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
|
|
|
|
Post by Onneravineet on Jan 30, 2008 17:01:52 GMT
Chuck Norris doesn't sleep.... he waits!
|
|
