|
|
Post by imallstokedup on Mar 5, 2009 23:10:35 GMT
Shawcross, Whelan, Lawrence, Wilkinson all left out for periods of time and all have come back like men possessed.
Surely great management by Pulis ?
|
|
|
|
Post by jbstokie on Mar 5, 2009 23:12:08 GMT
He must be doing something right, the spirit around the dressing room has never been this good
|
|
|
|
Post by macmozzer on Mar 5, 2009 23:35:34 GMT
he didn't give ric a proper bollocking after west ham,just trying to hold it together,keep our players on side and keep us up,tony is as scared as the rest of us,he gets it wrong often but he's the man for the job!!!.........if you're out for a night on the town pissed up and one of your mates slaps another mate,you sort it out ,there and then,i think thats what stoke do,i love our clubs togetherness . , happy days
|
|
|
|
Post by Carrot on Mar 5, 2009 23:37:01 GMT
Don't forget big Mama who despite not starting earlier in the season because of Kitson, he came back through merit and Kitson's misfortune and although he's not fully fit yet, before he got injured, he was and could be one of our best players!!
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Mar 5, 2009 23:37:44 GMT
he didn't give ric a proper bollocking after west ham,just trying to hold it together,keep our players on side and keep us up,tony is as scared as the rest of us,he gets it wrong often but he's the man for the job!!!.........if you're out for a night on the town pissed up and one of your mates slaps another mate,you sort it out ,there and then,i think thats what stoke do,i love our clubs togetherness . , happy days No, but it looks like Griffin has been given a proper bollocking for the Wet Sham incident. We were split on who to blame and it looks to me as TP thought it was Griff's fault. |
|
|
|
Post by macmozzer on Mar 5, 2009 23:40:10 GMT
we're new to this premiership lark,we're doing our best,up the mighty potters!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Soi Cowboy on Mar 5, 2009 23:47:39 GMT
Yep - Shawcross was making noises about a move not so long ago and Whelan threw a strop at being subbed. They've come back far better and obviously with mean competition at last no one is guaranteed a place.
'Shawcross, Whelan, Lawrence, Wilkinson all left out for periods of time and all have come back like men possessed.'
Maybe Kitson will be re-possessed by Reading with any luck .......
|
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Mar 5, 2009 23:52:46 GMT
Shawcross, Whelan, Lawrence, Wilkinson all left out for periods of time and all have come back like men possessed. Surely great management by Pulis ? It's testament to their characters in the sense that their heads could have dropped during their time in the so called wilderness. A players character comes before anything and once Pulis notices this then he can work on these very same players in enabling them to become even better individuals/players. Mope around and they're of no use to anyone, on the other hand if they keep their chin up and work hard then you'll get your rewards because same as TP says 'it's a team game' and he likes players that will not only graft hard but likes players that will run through brick walls for both themselves and team-mates. Tony Pulis is an absolute gem of a manager and one that we should all be proud of. Top man Tony Pulis who commands respect because he works damned bloody hard at gaining it in the first place. |
|
|
|
Post by macmozzer on Mar 5, 2009 23:55:23 GMT
how much money do you think we'd get for him?, does it matter now we're rich premiership rock stars???
|
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Mar 5, 2009 23:57:25 GMT
how much money do you think we'd get for him?, does it matter now we're rich premiership rock stars??? If you're on about Shawcross then you should be looking at a starting bid of some £15,000,000. |
|
|
|
Post by stokecityscott on Mar 5, 2009 23:57:52 GMT
TP is best stoke manager too date
|
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Mar 5, 2009 23:58:32 GMT
Shawcross, Whelan, Lawrence, Wilkinson all left out for periods of time and all have come back like men possessed. Surely great management by Pulis ? It's testament to their characters in the sense that their heads could have dropped during their time in the so called wilderness. A players character comes before anything and once Pulis notices this then he can work on these very same players in enabling them to become even better individuals/players. Mope around and they're of no use to anyone, on the other hand if they keep their chin up and work hard then you'll get your rewards because same as TP says 'it's a team game' and he likes players that will not only graft hard but likes players that will run through brick walls for both themselves and team-mates. Tony Pulis is an absolute gem of a manager and one that we should all be proud of. Top man Tony Pulis who commands respect because he works damned bloody hard at gaining it in the first place. I'm with you tazi. Sometimes his tactics and selections leave me banging my head against the wall but in all other aspects i think he's bloody brilliant and for his 1st year in the prem i'm very proud of him. |
|
|
|
Post by macmozzer on Mar 5, 2009 23:58:56 GMT
no,kitson!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by macmozzer on Mar 5, 2009 23:59:52 GMT
kitson
|
|
|
|
Post by MrBigJobby on Mar 6, 2009 0:01:34 GMT
from what I hear it was definitely Griffin who was in the wrong and If he said what is claimed then he will be gone soon
|
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Mar 6, 2009 0:05:12 GMT
No doubt his value would have gone down. Now if Reading were to come back up and if it were true that we only paid £2.5M upfront 'as some posters have suggested on here' then i suppose Reading would look to regain his signature at a cut price £1.5M. I doubt he's worth much more than that especially as it appears that he's fallen of the radar by not even making the subs bench. Possibly seems to me that his heads gone and isnt prepared to work even harder in training in an attempt to win it back too. |
|
|
|
Post by macmozzer on Mar 6, 2009 0:10:33 GMT
is it because our style doesn't suit him or is it because he's got no balls!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Mar 6, 2009 0:40:36 GMT
is it because our style doesn't suit him or is it because he's got no balls!!!!!!!!!!!! Bit of both really. |
|
