|
|
Post by goodfella on Feb 21, 2009 22:16:44 GMT
First off - am I Richard Cresswell?No.
Am I his number one fan? No.
Do I think he should of replaced Mama? No.
Do I think he is Premiership quality? No.
Was he at fault for the last goal? No.
Cresswell was told by his manager to come on and play. Which he did and gave his best effort as always. He did as much as he could for Johnsons cross and ultimately Ryans tried too hard too do something with the shot and scored the OG.
Too many people have an agenda against Cresswell on here and quite frankly its embarrassing too see so many stokies not removing the blinkers and seeing the bigger picture sometimes.
Give the bloke a break, he may be the one to score the goal that keeps us up. No doubt if that happens we will have The Richard Cresswell Appreciation Society.
Ryan unfortunately has cost us 2 points even though I thought he was one of our better players today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ron Jeremy on Feb 21, 2009 22:18:50 GMT
Its not his fault hes played, its TP's He gives 110% every game, thats what we want, we just dont want him to play, simple's  |
|
|
|
Post by goodfella on Feb 21, 2009 22:20:38 GMT
And I feel the same, will TP change his ways of corse not.
Cressy was not at anyway at fault for the goal.
|
|
|
|
Post by monkeycat on Feb 21, 2009 22:23:14 GMT
It would have been interesting to see fans reactions if it had been Cressy who scored the own goal!!! I don't think people would have been as sympathetic as they have been towards Ryan
|
|
|
|
Post by WorkingclassHero on Feb 21, 2009 22:38:02 GMT
The problem is, the introduction of Cresswell, is like a portent for bad luck. It is the signal for stoke to drop back a further ten yards and defend like there lives depend on it. It is quite frankly a ridiculous tactic which more often than not leads to late goals being lost as the team defends so deeply.
Today we were in relative control. Cresswell came on, and i was worried. For me it is a signal to the rest of the team to drop back and defend the 16 yard box like your life depends on it.
it is stupid. How many games as Cresswell been on and we've conceded late goals?
|
|
|
|
Post by imallstokedup on Feb 21, 2009 22:40:31 GMT
Fans booing his name when the subs were read out, is not on surely ?
|
|
|
|
Post by rorymscfc on Feb 21, 2009 22:43:43 GMT
I hope any negativity from the support doesn't affect Cresser (I thought I heard a few boos when he came on today?) because we can't afford him to get any more wank!
The bloke always gives 100%, and for that I applaud him.
I don't think he should have come on today and there is a strong argument that he cost us the win.
But at the end of the day it's not his fault is it? He's not going to say "Nah Gaffer, I really think you should put Camara on instead" is he?
RoryM
|
|
|
|
Post by KevinWhimper on Feb 21, 2009 22:49:50 GMT
It would have been interesting to see fans reactions if it had been Cressy who scored the own goal!!! I don't think people would have been as sympathetic as they have been towards Ryan I said the same thing on another thread mate, we need to get off his back a bit, it's not his fault he's getting picked every week. |
|
|
|
Post by bunnyscfc on Feb 21, 2009 23:05:47 GMT
Love him for last season but hey,
their left back shot - who should have been marking? Case closed m'lud.
We are in the elite league now - Cresswell and Sidibe will play 20 games each. Not good enough imho.
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Feb 21, 2009 23:50:14 GMT
He was actually booed when he came on as a sub, by people in the South Stand. I don't call them supporters at all. Tossers one and all.
|
|
