|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Jan 14, 2009 15:06:15 GMT
breaking news on sky  |
|
raytupper
Youth Player
Start prayin mother fuckers!!!!!!!
Posts: 438
|
Post by raytupper on Jan 14, 2009 15:07:22 GMT
ffs tone, ger on the blower duck
|
|
|
|
Post by n01stokie on Jan 14, 2009 15:07:53 GMT
get in there pulis!
|
|
|
|
Post by canadianmoose on Jan 14, 2009 15:13:24 GMT
Would not pay 5 million for Bullard
|
|
|
|
Post by rednwhite81 on Jan 14, 2009 15:14:01 GMT
i second third and fourth that 1 GET ON THE FONE TONE!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Bick on Jan 14, 2009 15:14:08 GMT
I would pay MORE than 5mil for Bullard! That man would keep us in the prem! But his wages would be toooooo big for little ol' stoke!  |
|
|
|
Post by rednwhite81 on Jan 14, 2009 15:15:19 GMT
Bullard is 5 times the player kitson will ever be we paid 5 mil for him so why not 5 mil or 6 mil for Jimmy!!!!!! ??? ??? ??? ???
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Jan 14, 2009 15:16:12 GMT
How on this Earth is Ledley valued higher than Bullard? I know which fella I would prefer pulling the strings.
|
|
|
|
Post by garyhackett on Jan 14, 2009 15:17:06 GMT
If Bolton can afford him then so can we, a much much better player than Ledley.
|
|
|
|
Post by A-teen_six_T3 on Jan 14, 2009 15:17:06 GMT
Bullard is a CLASS act. If we would sign him, he would take over from Beattie as our top earner, he would want/need upwards of 35-40k I would imagine!
If we did manage to land him, I would be a very very happy chappy...
|
|
|
|
Post by gilberto on Jan 14, 2009 15:17:34 GMT
How on this Earth is Ledley valued higher than Bullard? I know which fella I would prefer pulling the strings. pretty much exactly what ive just posted on t'other thread knowles! |
|
|
|
Post by PONTAFCE on Jan 14, 2009 15:17:45 GMT
I would pay MORE than 5mil for Bullard! That man would keep us in the prem! But his wages would be toooooo big for little ol' stoke! One player doesnt keep us in the prem fella its all of them.He is a better version of whelan imo and his wage demands would be silly money. |
|
|
|
Post by potterspride88 on Jan 14, 2009 15:18:06 GMT
Bullard is a quality player, would love see him at Stoke, he is like Whelan but alot betterand he is great on deadball situation
|
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jan 14, 2009 15:19:00 GMT
£5m is a pinch....bad news if he goes to Bolton
|
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Jan 14, 2009 15:22:12 GMT
I would pay MORE than 5mil for Bullard! That man would keep us in the prem! But his wages would be toooooo big for little ol' stoke! One player doesnt keep us in the prem fella its all of them.He is a better version of whelan imo and his wage demands would be silly money. i seem to remember his coming back from injury back end of last season tied in with them going on there run that kept them up |
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Jan 14, 2009 15:23:08 GMT
Spot on Mark. His signing would probably ensure Bolton's safety although what it will do for Fulham is another matter...
|
|
|
|
Post by A-teen_six_T3 on Jan 14, 2009 15:23:40 GMT
How on this Earth is Ledley valued higher than Bullard? I know which fella I would prefer pulling the strings. pretty much exactly what ive just posted on t'other thread knowles! Age, pottential. I know it's not the best comparison....But on earth was Theo Walcott valued at £12M. More than.......on top of my head Deco... |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 14, 2009 15:23:43 GMT
Bullard is a CLASS act. If we would sign him, he would take over from Beattie as our top earner, he would want/need upwards of 35-40k I would imagine! If we did manage to land him, I would be a very very happy chappy... Bullard currently on 25k a week apparently: www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/sport/article111779.ece |
|
|
|
Post by georgeberrysafro on Jan 14, 2009 15:24:47 GMT
If Bolton can afford him then so can we, a much much better player than Ledley. I don't think so, Bolton are a well established Prem side that can surely push their wage barrier above 30k for a few players now with consecutive seasons in the Prem. We can push it to 30k for one player but I think Bullard is looking for 50k a week. Elmander signed for 13 Million this season, we couldn't spend 13 million on 1 player! There's no way we could pay 50k a week in our first season in the Prem for anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jan 14, 2009 15:26:56 GMT
If Bolton can afford him then so can we, a much much better player than Ledley. I don't think so, Bolton are a well established Prem side that can surely push their wage barrier above 30k for a few players now with consecutive seasons in the Prem. We can push it to 30k for one player but I think Bullard is looking for 50k a week. Elmander signed for 13 Million this season, we couldn't spend 13 million on 1 player! There's no way we could pay 50k a week in our first season in the Prem for anyone. elmander - hows he been since that wonder fluke against us |
|
|
|
Post by garyhackett on Jan 14, 2009 15:27:55 GMT
If Bolton can afford him then so can we, a much much better player than Ledley. I don't think so, Bolton are a well established Prem side that can surely push their wage barrier above 30k for a few players now with consecutive seasons in the Prem. We can push it to 30k for one player but I think Bullard is looking for 50k a week. Elmander signed for 13 Million this season, we couldn't spend 13 million on 1 player! There's no way we could pay 50k a week in our first season in the Prem for anyone. have you seen boltons average attendences recently? they get a similar income from sky that we do so where else do they get this extra money from ?! |
|
|
|
Post by georgeberrysafro on Jan 14, 2009 15:28:11 GMT
Bullard is a CLASS act. If we would sign him, he would take over from Beattie as our top earner, he would want/need upwards of 35-40k I would imagine! If we did manage to land him, I would be a very very happy chappy... Bullard currently on 25k a week apparently: www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/sport/article111779.ece25k sounds about right for Fulham, I still wouldn't trust newsoftheworld for anything though. I still think he'll be looking for a decent pay rise anyway, probably 35-40k? Still, if he left for 5 million and Bolton agreed a contract of 25k a week then I would be disappointed. Him or Ledley? No much competition really. |
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Jan 14, 2009 15:28:56 GMT
Spot on Mark. His signing would probably ensure Bolton's safety although what it will do for Fulham is another matter... i know,would be suicidal them letting him go, i still don't understand how they are 9th, doesn't ever seem to me like they win much!  and there top league goalscorers are johnson and Dempsey both with 4, and they have only scored 18 league goals altogether, which is exactly the same amount as we have scored, fine margins indeed!! |
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 14, 2009 15:30:26 GMT
25k sounds about right for Fulham, I still wouldn't trust newsoftheworld for anything though. I still think he'll be looking for a decent pay rise anyway, probably 35-40k? Still, if he left for 5 million and Bolton agreed a contract of 25k a week then I would be disappointed. Him or Ledley? No much competition really. Yeah. Agree with that, Georgie. But surely Bolton wouldn't go that high.? They broke the bank on Anelka's salary. But surely he was a one-off. Even people like Elmander who'd been playing for a mid-ranking French team could easily have been attracted by 25-30k. |
|
|
|
Post by georgeberrysafro on Jan 14, 2009 15:31:15 GMT
I don't think so, Bolton are a well established Prem side that can surely push their wage barrier above 30k for a few players now with consecutive seasons in the Prem. We can push it to 30k for one player but I think Bullard is looking for 50k a week. Elmander signed for 13 Million this season, we couldn't spend 13 million on 1 player! There's no way we could pay 50k a week in our first season in the Prem for anyone. elmander - hows he been since that wonder fluke against us 5 goals in 17 appearances, he seems okay just gets injured whenever he gets fully fit and back in the side. The goal you're thinking of was Steinsson wasn't it?...the right back? Elmander scored the free header to make it 3-0 when Cort and Shawcross left him free in the box. |
|
|
|
Post by pushon on Jan 14, 2009 15:31:25 GMT
Not sure how old Ledley (20?) is but Bullard is 30, so there is that to consider. You wouldn't get a return on Bullard at the end of his contract, but he might be able to guarantee prem survival.
Dilemma eh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 14, 2009 15:31:38 GMT
Spot on Mark. His signing would probably ensure Bolton's safety although what it will do for Fulham is another matter... i know,would be suicidal them letting him go, i still don't understand how they are 9th, doesn't ever seem to me like they win much! and there top league goalscorers are johnson and Dempsey both with 4, and they have only scored 18 league goals altogether, which is exactly the same amount as we have scored, fine margins indeed!! Maybe a similar situation to Sheffield Utd letting Beattie go? |
|
|
|
Post by A-teen_six_T3 on Jan 14, 2009 15:32:45 GMT
Bullard is a CLASS act. If we would sign him, he would take over from Beattie as our top earner, he would want/need upwards of 35-40k I would imagine! If we did manage to land him, I would be a very very happy chappy... Bullard currently on 25k a week apparently: www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/sport/article111779.eceOffer him the same terms, and we can afford the 5million...He's out player  |
|
|
|
Post by n01stokie on Jan 14, 2009 15:33:14 GMT
Bolton are famous for paying low transfer fees but high wages: okotcha, stelios, ect but in recent seasons they have begun to spend big on fees, they would be able to offer 30/50k on wages i reckon
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Jan 14, 2009 15:33:43 GMT
elmander - hows he been since that wonder fluke against us That was Steinsson  And the answer? Pretty poor- he's struggled with form and injuries (he went off at the weekend but not sure how serious the injury was) |
|
