|
Post by eatthebeast on Jan 10, 2009 15:17:25 GMT
Surely the player involved will not play or be involved for us today!
So if its Cressy he won't play Pugh etc etc
When is the team named for today?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2009 15:18:42 GMT
Do we actually know if there is a player involved in the deal or are we just going on speculation from their message board?
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Jan 10, 2009 15:22:47 GMT
Vince and Cressy,
With love x
|
|
|
Post by Squeekster on Jan 10, 2009 15:33:20 GMT
They are being strongly linked with Leta i think.
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Jan 10, 2009 15:39:39 GMT
I heard Chopra aswell so there's all sorts of possibilities out there
|
|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Jan 10, 2009 15:40:04 GMT
isnt pugh injured?
|
|
|
Post by stanners on Jan 10, 2009 15:43:01 GMT
It's so unlikely that there's a player involved - it's just speculation at their end because they think 2.5 is cheap for Beattie. Anybody speculating kitson is part of the deal is deluded!
|
|
|
Post by vincentperiwinkle on Jan 10, 2009 16:21:03 GMT
if there is a player involved i hope it isnt kitson, this boy with lawrence and etherington now will show us what hes really made of!!
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jan 10, 2009 16:27:07 GMT
I hope TP and PC show some b**lOcks today and play our best available team regardless of any transfer talk. If SUFC say there is no deal then even if they fancy Pugh or Cressy I would have them all in the squad as a big two fingers to Sheff U.
If they want to play games about if we have a deal or not then we should too. Kitson, Cress and Pugh would all be in my squad. A goal from either or an assist would add a million onto their "makeweight" value. Goarn Stoke we are the Prem team this time around. Play aaaard ball.
A point today is worth more than any of their messin about.
|
|
|
Post by armitagestokie on Jan 10, 2009 20:32:23 GMT
Says in the express and Star that yes it's Kitson they want!!
|
|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Jan 10, 2009 20:33:34 GMT
Kitson will stay! He will come good! I would be gutted if I was wrong and he did go!
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Jan 10, 2009 20:35:02 GMT
could be tonge?
|
|
|
Post by scfc1987 on Jan 10, 2009 20:37:08 GMT
Is it defo a permanent move or could it be some sort of loan deal?
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Jan 10, 2009 20:38:50 GMT
I'd be genuinely sorry to see Cressy go after today, this may not be a popular thing to say but I reckon we really need him for the rest of the season.
|
|
|
Post by surreystokie on Jan 11, 2009 19:00:27 GMT
Davies involved?
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Jan 11, 2009 19:01:38 GMT
Pericard ;D
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2009 19:02:42 GMT
Monica thats who i think is involved in the deal only time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 11, 2009 19:03:58 GMT
Soares?
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Jan 11, 2009 19:04:26 GMT
Pugh for me. He was only on the bench because Diao was injured.
|
|
|
Post by redditchpotter on Jan 11, 2009 19:07:41 GMT
I think the same,they might want him back.
|
|
|
Post by stonestokie! on Jan 11, 2009 19:10:29 GMT
I think the same,they might want him back. what a waste of money then?
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Jan 11, 2009 19:13:10 GMT
not really if we get beattie
|
|