|
|
Post by Stoke_FaN_DaN on Jan 3, 2009 21:12:43 GMT
no he wasnt.
we have a youth team. do you think one of our youth stikers would have done better than him today? seriouse answer please. i think yes and we should have started a youth striker up-front today instead of him.
|
|
|
|
Post by RMSCFC on Jan 3, 2009 21:13:30 GMT
yes put marc grocott in ther  |
|
|
|
Post by viiistokieviii on Jan 3, 2009 21:13:53 GMT
Anyone but him would have done for me
|
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Jan 3, 2009 21:14:18 GMT
Warwick Alexander might have been worth a start.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokie25 on Jan 3, 2009 21:14:34 GMT
well it couldn't have been much worse, could it ???
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Jan 3, 2009 21:15:35 GMT
Big risk, playing a young player in a banana skin of a game like that. We played an experienced team and those with something to prove didn't turn up.
|
|
|
|
Post by boothenmonkey on Jan 3, 2009 21:15:51 GMT
Liams dog had an afternoon off maybe a better option than we started with.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stoke_FaN_DaN on Jan 3, 2009 21:16:31 GMT
it is a risk put its worth taking in the cup rather than the league. speshly when hes replacing pericant.
|
|
|
|
Post by rfstokie on Jan 3, 2009 21:16:34 GMT
A youth team striker would have been a by far option
They would have played their heart's out unlike Pericard who only cares for the money.
|
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Jan 3, 2009 21:17:06 GMT
Big risk, playing a young player in a banana skin of a game like that. We played an experienced team and those with something to prove didn't turn up. Spot on, and that lack of extra motivation worries me a lot. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 3, 2009 21:21:21 GMT
Pericard has never looked like he can be bothered though!  |
|
"]
