|
Post by Gods on Dec 1, 2008 18:18:39 GMT
As in "I'm not making any apologies for the way they play".
It makes no sense. Why would Phil Brown "apologise" for the way Stoke play, it would be up to us to do that.
I think what he meant was that he wasn't blaming Hull's failure to take all 3 points on Stoke's tactics.
|
|
|
Post by crimesy on Dec 1, 2008 19:00:27 GMT
fuck knows what he meant, all i know is WE deserved 3 points, not dull.
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Dec 1, 2008 19:10:55 GMT
He meant that Hull could have played better, that he can apologise for, but he can't apologise to the paying public for the'way' Stoke play that turned it into a poor game.
Complete Bullshit obviously as he's implying that Stoke can't play any better and it's our style that ruins matches but that's what he meant.
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on Dec 1, 2008 19:12:32 GMT
hes a tit!!
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Dec 1, 2008 20:42:44 GMT
Truumpton, on reflection you are absolutely right with that interpretation of what he said!
|
|
|
Post by swampySCFC on Dec 1, 2008 22:00:48 GMT
nob
|
|
|
Post by swanlandtiger on Dec 1, 2008 22:21:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by swampySCFC on Dec 1, 2008 22:23:21 GMT
Is that why you are always here?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2008 22:24:58 GMT
He meant that Hull could have played better, that he can apologise for, but he can't apologise to the paying public for the'way' Stoke play that turned it into a poor game. Complete Bullshit obviously as he's implying that Stoke can't play any better and it's our style that ruins matches but that's what he meant. What he actually said was that he made no apologies for the way his team played, and made no apologies for Stoke either. Don't like him, but a perfectly reasonable comment.
|
|
|
Post by swanlandtiger on Dec 1, 2008 23:08:09 GMT
Is that why you are always here? IT IS ACTUALLY. THINK OF IT LIKE GOING TO THE ZOO AND HAVING A LAFF WATCHING THE CHIMPS STICK THEIR FINGERS UP THEIR ARSE.
|
|
|
Post by XLITTLEMISSSTOKEX on Dec 1, 2008 23:09:34 GMT
he's a muppet
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2008 23:10:24 GMT
Is that why you are always here? IT IS ACTUALLY. THINK OF IT LIKE GOING TO THE ZOO AND HAVING A LAFF WATCHING THE CHIMPS STICK THEIR FINGERS UP THEIR ARSE. Is that what passes for titillation in Hull?
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Dec 1, 2008 23:11:47 GMT
Is that why you are always here? IT IS ACTUALLY. THINK OF IT LIKE GOING TO THE ZOO AND HAVING A LAFF WATCHING THE CHIMPS STICK THEIR FINGERS UP THEIR ARSE. There may well be a few chimps on here fella but i've seen you post lots of times on here now and most of them are just abuse. Have you ever got anything interesting or even mildly amusing to add?
|
|
|
Post by crimesy on Dec 1, 2008 23:12:01 GMT
Swanlandtiger = obsessed/jealous of everything about Stoke City, go back to your own board you petty man.
|
|
|
Post by powchirper on Dec 1, 2008 23:22:16 GMT
Then spells laugh.....laff.
****. (spelt right)
|
|
|
Post by swanlandtiger on Dec 1, 2008 23:32:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by swanlandtiger on Dec 1, 2008 23:34:17 GMT
Then spells laugh.....laff. ****. (spelt right) SNIGGER......THERE'S ALWAYS ONE!
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Dec 1, 2008 23:36:40 GMT
Seriously now ... it says you're 33 but as you put about 15 smiley faces on most messages and others just consist of half a page of WA! WA! WA! WA!.
I'm just saying it's not looking good for you fella.
|
|
|
Post by swanlandtiger on Dec 1, 2008 23:37:54 GMT
Swanlandtiger = obsessed/jealous of everything about Stoke City, go back to your own board you petty man. THIS IS MY BOARD. I NOW REGARD IT AS HOME.
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Dec 1, 2008 23:40:01 GMT
well with the bearded munters that come from Hull, I expect they are the better option, and probably have a better command of english too
|
|
|
Post by Carrot on Dec 1, 2008 23:48:56 GMT
I used to think quite highly of the guy (painful to say I know) but after hearing all this and seeing his antics, I have come to the rather brief and subtle conclusion which I feel is shared by the majority of posters on this board that...
He's a cock ;D
|
|
|
Post by swanlandtiger on Dec 2, 2008 0:01:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by tuum on Dec 2, 2008 3:11:48 GMT
I think you can interpret Phil Brown's comments in two ways. One way is that he is having a subtle pop at Stoke. The other is that it is a completely neutral statement. It is up to you as to how you choose to view what he said. Perhaps what he said previously may help to determine the context?
|
|