|
Post by isaypubyousayquiz on Jan 10, 2008 19:54:58 GMT
you have got feel sorry for these two lads,they give 100% every fucking game and now griff is back looks like wilko is going to get pushed out,just feel sorry for em both these are boys stoke through and through unlike others.
|
|
|
Post by thats entertainment on Jan 10, 2008 19:55:58 GMT
pub
|
|
|
Post by Done it for scfcbuxton on Jan 10, 2008 19:56:12 GMT
If anyone it'll be Dicko (again) that loses out
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Jan 10, 2008 19:56:27 GMT
No room for sentiment in football though mate. If you have an opportunity to sign better players you get them in - end of.
|
|
|
Post by kingdeano on Jan 10, 2008 19:56:44 GMT
totally agree with you where they give 100%, personally i dont think dick is good enough, much prefer griff at left back, wilko as been superb, think he offers a little bit more than dicko
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Jan 10, 2008 19:57:12 GMT
they are both good 'defenders' but arent as good as griff going forward, getting crosses in etc
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jan 10, 2008 20:01:46 GMT
You may find TP uses Griff tactically and starts him in home games and puts him on the bench in away games.
|
|
|
Post by gibby1409 on Jan 10, 2008 20:03:34 GMT
Agree that Griff is better than both of them at the moment, Wilko will probably play RB, and Dicko sit out for a while, but they have, and will continue to play a big part this season, and all the time learning from Griff (As long as it's the Griff pre Christmas 2006!)
Both Wilko & Dicko will play a big part in our hopefully bright future, and Griff is the ideal senior pro, I just hope that Andy & Carl, plus the club, look longer term, and are patient.
|
|
|
Post by mark71 on Jan 10, 2008 20:04:29 GMT
Spot on mate. Remember Sir Alex in the FA cup replay bringing les Seeley in.
|
|
|
Post by tigger68 on Jan 10, 2008 20:05:27 GMT
griffs greed has cost stoke 300k we could of had him for nothing in the summer but he took the money
|
|
|
Post by stokiesteve1966 on Jan 10, 2008 20:07:28 GMT
Derby paid 500k for him didnt they?
|
|
|
Post by tigger68 on Jan 10, 2008 20:10:19 GMT
did they? thought he was a free................
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Jan 10, 2008 20:10:31 GMT
Correct Steve, he was never on a free.
|
|
|
Post by stokiesteve1966 on Jan 10, 2008 20:11:22 GMT
Thought so, cause we had a 500k offer accepted from Pompy, at the time.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2008 20:14:42 GMT
I am sure he still had 18 months or so on a Pompey contract at the time.
|
|
|
Post by stokecityscott on Jan 10, 2008 20:16:44 GMT
He moved to Derby for £500k he had 12 months left on his contract, it expired June this year.
|
|
|
Post by tigger68 on Jan 10, 2008 20:19:42 GMT
dont feel so bad about him coming back now
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2008 20:27:14 GMT
;D
|
|