|
|
Post by premierpotters08 on Nov 23, 2008 15:18:27 GMT
who do you prefer start atm im going for kitson when fit fuller is a very good sub.
|
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Nov 23, 2008 15:19:33 GMT
Sorry but there is no need to ask this question, but since you have, you got the answer wrong
|
|
|
|
Post by premierpotters08 on Nov 23, 2008 15:23:50 GMT
dave i see where your coming from but asoon as kitson gets this 1st goal im sure hell be unstopable then and with fuller being in my eyes a better sub than starter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bick on Nov 23, 2008 15:24:07 GMT
Fuller is an AMAZING sub! But even from the start when he gets stroppy... he can still get the ball and cause havoc
|
|
|
|
Post by walrus on Nov 23, 2008 15:29:03 GMT
Fuller is often very effective coming on against tired defenders as a sub. But then again he's also by far and away our best striker at the moment so it would be ridiculous not to start him when he's fit and available.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingdeano on Nov 23, 2008 15:31:59 GMT
no brainer really, kitson aint scored a bloody goal yet and is looking remarkebly shit! whereas fuller is looking every bit a top notch premier league striker! do people actually need think of that question?? why leave our best players on the bench?? really dont get that question
|
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Nov 23, 2008 15:33:30 GMT
Fuller is a good sub to have for the odd game, like when he comes back from international duty late, but he has to be in the starting 11 imo, ... the problem Kitson now has, besides his injury, is displacing Mama, because not only is Mama doing well, he's not the sort of player you like to bring off late on, he the type you want to keep on the pitch in the last 10 minutes due to his work rate, so unless Pulis decides to sub Fuller in matches, he's going to struggle.
|
|
