|
|
Post by stokiemac on Jan 10, 2008 11:15:21 GMT
personally i think its good as with Man U coming up and Bolton next week our game may slip under the radar and new manager or not they may have stopped caring about the FA cup
|
|
|
|
Post by StokieSC on Jan 10, 2008 11:15:58 GMT
Don't jinx it.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokiemac on Jan 10, 2008 11:17:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by potters11 on Jan 10, 2008 11:20:43 GMT
I can only see it being bad news.
Stokiemac: Have some karma for your 100th.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Jan 10, 2008 11:26:28 GMT
Bad. If they start slowly they won't be able to get on the managers back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Menorca Stokie on Jan 10, 2008 11:29:27 GMT
If it's Steve Mclaren I reckon we could put our reserve team out and still win. ;D
Please let it be.
Mclaren in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Not_Nick_H on Jan 10, 2008 11:30:12 GMT
As they'll probably still be on a care-taker manager by Wednesday (McDermott?), probably no better or worse for us. If it was the proper new gaffer installed then the players would obviously be in it to impress, but I think we could still be in with a chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by StokieSC on Jan 10, 2008 11:33:09 GMT
As they'll probably still be on a care-taker manager by Wednesday (McDermott?), probably no better or worse for us. If it was the proper new gaffer installed then the players would obviously be in it to impress, but I think we could still be in with a chance. Nigel Pearson is the caretaker now. was he not Gudjons number 2? |
|
|
|
Post by stokiemac on Jan 10, 2008 11:34:52 GMT
potters 11 thank you  Castles version of smudge said on SSN this morning he expected a new manger be in charge for stoke but sit in the stands. |
|
