|
|
Post by Spiderman on Nov 16, 2008 13:40:05 GMT
Imagine them both in the Stoke line up, IMO that would be an exciting forward line that would create many goals. I’d stake my house on the fact that Pulis wouldn’t even consider it.
|
|
|
|
Post by pottersrule on Nov 16, 2008 13:53:06 GMT
He would not,because Wolves wont sell him.
|
|
|
|
Post by trebor63 on Nov 16, 2008 14:21:46 GMT
I reckon Camara of wigan would be a more likely target but he played yesterday so maybe not!
|
|
|
|
Post by th05 on Nov 16, 2008 14:21:56 GMT
He would be quality.
|
|
|
|
Post by imallstokedup on Nov 16, 2008 14:24:27 GMT
Did Pullis not have Ebanks Blake at Plymouth ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bick on Nov 16, 2008 14:25:51 GMT
Agreed, but I think Harewood and Fuller is equal, if not a better line up
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2008 14:35:38 GMT
Are they too similar to both fit into our system though?
|
|
|
|
Post by nathan on Nov 16, 2008 15:52:27 GMT
rvd,
That was my immediate thought when I opened the thread.
A Pulis system necessitates one of the strikers to be a target man and particular emphasis on them doing the 'unfashionable side'. Ebanks-Blake would be a back-up for Fuller, as opposed to someone we're going to partner him with. It's irrelevant anyway really, I can't see him coming here.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfctilidie on Nov 16, 2008 16:05:15 GMT
Ebanks-Blake is unproven at this level  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stokie on Nov 16, 2008 16:45:51 GMT
I dont hink he would fit the system as he is too small to play the long ball to which i generally our preferred style of play, he is a great player though
|
|
;D
