|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Dec 30, 2007 9:38:14 GMT
Given that Mama seems to have been flagging for the last couple of games, and that Parkin would be fired up against his old club, would you start with Parkin on Tuesday instead of Big Mama?
Mixed feelings myself - suspect it is one of those decisions for which Tony would be damned if he does, and damned if he doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thank you from Moorlander1 on Dec 30, 2007 9:49:29 GMT
A bad Mama is a better option than a best Parkin or Pericard,these two guys have had their chances and have failed. Just put Fuller up with Cresswell.
|
|
|
|
Post by citysoldierjack on Dec 30, 2007 10:48:41 GMT
parken will be up for this game as he hates the hull manager y not start him cumon beast do um!
|
|
|
|
Post by smigchop on Dec 30, 2007 12:01:33 GMT
How is a bad mama better than parkin at his best?
parkin has most definately not had his chance. mama has had 20 odd starts and no goals. parkin has been coming off the bench and has atleast managed two goals.
|
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Dec 30, 2007 12:06:50 GMT
moorlander1
when was Parkin given his chance?
i must have missed that part of the season!
|
|
|
|
Post by kingdeano on Dec 30, 2007 12:34:43 GMT
moorlander1
that is the biggest bollox ive ever read! "a bad mama is better than parkin at his best"
parkin aint started that many and when hes come off the bench hes scored a couple.
mama 26 games no goals! pathetic
|
|
|
|
Post by scfclifer on Dec 30, 2007 12:39:02 GMT
demar has been getting good reviews from the reserve games,,,i'd start with parkin against hull if that don't work bring demar on and put cressy up front with fuller i think mama cud do with a week off get his head straight and make up his mind about the ACN i've heard tony say Mama's family is giving is pulling him in different directions over his decision maybe this has something 2 do with his form?
|
|
|
|
Post by nathan on Dec 30, 2007 13:10:34 GMT
I think Cressy to run the channels would be a better option given our current style - and lets face it, he too will be fired up as it was Hull who raised questions over his fitness. I like Parkin, I just do not think he is at all effective with the current style. It may be the time to unleash Demar, as I doubt that TP will want to disrupt Pugh as he is proving a very tidy left back...
|
|
|
|
Post by scfclifer on Dec 30, 2007 13:43:49 GMT
i agree drop sidibe get cressy up front bring in demar try it out we might as well.sidibe cant score 4 shit...parkins not fit enough for 90 mins and we paid a substantial fee for demar we might as well use him he's playing well in reserves as well
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 30, 2007 13:48:32 GMT
If Salif is ready to play then I would put Demar in from the start and Cressy up front becuase Salif would more than capable to hold the ball up in the middle.
|
|
|
|
Post by nathan on Dec 30, 2007 13:49:59 GMT
Trying to utilise Parkin in the 'Sidibe role' is ridiculous - he lacks the mobility, athleticism, aerial ability and work rate in order to do it 'competently'. Last season we saw what Parkin was capable of when we were playing with 2 genuine strikers at the top of the field. Unfortunately, I do not believe we have enough ability in midfield to mirror the style we used when Parkin signed on loan, where we used a less direct approach - and thus, he has proved to be of minimal use this season.
|
|
|
|
Post by nathan on Dec 30, 2007 13:51:03 GMT
sidders,
Is Diao near being ready, though?
He has not featured on the bench yet, and I can not recall him partaking in a reserve fixture.
|
|
