|
|
Post by supergerrytaggart on Dec 18, 2007 11:52:05 GMT
It's something that's been nagging me for a while. We currently officially have the lad on loan but have we actually secured his services permantly?
|
|
|
|
Post by Do it for bringbackthevic on Dec 18, 2007 11:53:47 GMT
Yes
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 18, 2007 11:54:05 GMT
I'm 99.9% sure we have.
|
|
|
|
Post by supergerrytaggart on Dec 18, 2007 11:55:23 GMT
It's 99.9% feeling thats nagging at me  I just can't wait to see it officially announced in Jan. |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Dec 18, 2007 11:57:07 GMT
It is similar to the Lawrence and Delap loans last season. We have an agreement to buy but the player or either club could presumably back out of the deal if they wished. The same goes for Pugh. You'll have to be patient and wait for January.
|
|
|
|
Post by bogus on Dec 18, 2007 11:57:34 GMT
If you remember, when he initially signed on loan, there was a delay whilst Stoke and Palace haggled over a fee............and then again with Hill the other way.
You would assume it's all tied up from that.
|
|
StokieSideAss
Youth Player
Let's see how you like it[F4:[img]
Posts: 411
|
Post by StokieSideAss on Dec 18, 2007 17:53:49 GMT
I would have thought so, seeing as he's bought a house up here and is becoming Fuller's new nextdoor neightbour ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Dec 18, 2007 18:07:56 GMT
tiger - Trundle's neighbour, surely?
|
|
|
|
Post by stokecityscott on Dec 18, 2007 18:16:29 GMT
100% signed, Only Stoke can back out of the deal, which i doubt they will do.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 19, 2007 1:32:58 GMT
More Stokies on Whychwood Park! Hope my Dad didn't build his house |
|
