|
|
Post by Menorca Stokie on Dec 11, 2007 18:29:35 GMT
Erm, I thing were agreeing now. Glad you've seen sense. ;D
|
|
bodd
Academy Starlet
Posts: 153
|
Post by bodd on Dec 11, 2007 18:31:55 GMT
i think the word illegal says it all just because he has a job makes no difference if he is no longer in danger why should he stay here
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 11, 2007 18:31:56 GMT
;D Nah I still think he shouldn't be deported!
|
|
|
|
Post by Menorca Stokie on Dec 11, 2007 18:33:53 GMT
Neither did I, I just thought asking the question would provoke a response.  |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 11, 2007 18:36:09 GMT
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Dec 11, 2007 19:36:21 GMT
Looks to me, judging by many of the replies, that, sadly, there are a number of racists on this Board. You can bet that he'd have been allowed to stay if he'd been playing for Chelsea, Man Ure, etc. |
|
|
|
Post by Menorca Stokie on Dec 12, 2007 8:12:21 GMT
rebelliousjukebox
I hope your not refering to me?
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Dec 12, 2007 18:08:27 GMT
rebelliousjukebox I hope your not refering to me? Menorcasi. No. |
|
|
|
Post by stayingupfor GermanStokie on Dec 13, 2007 9:14:04 GMT
Rebellious, you are probably right about the Bigger club syndrome, however I still feel that the home office would have still stated their intent in much the same way.
I dont agree with you with the "number of racists" remarks. To be honest, the rules are there for a reason and we should refer to them no matter what or else chaos would resume. If his temporary (4 year) "visa" is up then it has to be said that he must go back, as the original circumstances for his entry may have changed, otherwise you may as well let every tom dick and harry in no matter what the circumstances. That is why there is an appeal system so they can look at individual cases, which in this case may say that he could stay.
|
|
