|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2007 22:15:57 GMT
As far as I am aware its Patto's tribunal tomorrow, doe anyone know how much we have valued him at ???
|
|
|
|
Post by salifdiao on Dec 10, 2007 22:42:20 GMT
Pulis valued him at 37 pence
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Dec 10, 2007 22:45:49 GMT
I'm not sure sidders but I'm not holding out much hope for a decent fee to be honest. They don't take his current form into account and can rightly say he didn't play a great deal for us so if we get £100k I think it's probably about right. Fair play to Scunthorpe, they took a chance on a lad with very little experience and its paid off for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2007 22:52:14 GMT
I would think they will look to get back £250,000 for him really as they reckon thats the cost of bringing a player through the ranks? However from other times we have been to these tribunals then I would say £100k sounds about right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Dec 10, 2007 22:55:59 GMT
Fees are a bit odd at the minute all throughout football. £250k is more reasonable given his development at Stoke but when you consider how much we paid for Higginbotham and Fuller perhaps it looks to much??
|
|
|
|
Post by bogus on Dec 10, 2007 22:58:41 GMT
Unproven youngsters in this division tend to go for low fees but with quite a few sell-ons...........just in case!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 10, 2007 23:02:01 GMT
I dont think the outcome will have a bearing on the warchest. I believe that money is set and will not budge. Pulis I would imagine has that money spent already on players he wishes to come in. The cup match funds I think already have been stated as going into the running costs of the club. So I think if they get 250k they will very happy less they will I imagine be a bit miffed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Dec 10, 2007 23:09:42 GMT
No I agree it won't have a bearing, the club will not have budgeted for a decent fee I imagine. We rarely have much joy at tribunals  |
|
