Post by Jamo on the wing on Dec 10, 2007 22:45:49 GMT
I'm not sure sidders but I'm not holding out much hope for a decent fee to be honest. They don't take his current form into account and can rightly say he didn't play a great deal for us so if we get £100k I think it's probably about right. Fair play to Scunthorpe, they took a chance on a lad with very little experience and its paid off for them.
I would think they will look to get back £250,000 for him really as they reckon thats the cost of bringing a player through the ranks? However from other times we have been to these tribunals then I would say £100k sounds about right.
Post by Jamo on the wing on Dec 10, 2007 22:55:59 GMT
Fees are a bit odd at the minute all throughout football. £250k is more reasonable given his development at Stoke but when you consider how much we paid for Higginbotham and Fuller perhaps it looks to much??
I dont think the outcome will have a bearing on the warchest. I believe that money is set and will not budge. Pulis I would imagine has that money spent already on players he wishes to come in. The cup match funds I think already have been stated as going into the running costs of the club. So I think if they get 250k they will very happy less they will I imagine be a bit miffed.