How on earth are you going to be able to rationalise, formalise, mobilise, and post-rationalise all of these conflicts without a fully equipped civil service?
How on earth are you going to be able to rationalise, formalise, mobilise, and post-rationalise all of these conflicts without a fully equipped civil service?
Have a word with yourself, man!
Youtube ? There's usually a video on how to do anything !
How on earth are you going to be able to rationalise, formalise, mobilise, and post-rationalise all of these conflicts without a fully equipped civil service?
Have a word with yourself, man!
Youtube ? There's usually a video on how to do anything !
You need a committee to decide which is the correct kind of video before you can possibly do that.
Then, once you’ve done that, you’ll be needing a full public consultation.
Youtube ? There's usually a video on how to do anything !
You need a committee to decide which is the correct kind of video before you can possibly do that.
Then, once you’ve done that, you’ll be needing a full public consultation.
He has a point, though. You can't have more than one civil servant per soldier. That's ridiculous. You wouldn't get anything done for the sound of paper shuffling if you worked in admin. I've worked in places were instead of getting the right person in, they get three in to do a one person job. Terrible way to run a business. The money that could be saved on throw away wages can't be ignored, when a lot of our public services seem to be in dire need of repair.
One of those stats that doesn't surprise you but perhaps it should.
The idea we could defend ourselves against a military like Russia is just laughable. Let's hope they don't come calling.
Not wrong. Our technology is superior in most areas but we'd be massively outnumbered. I heard today we've now got the smallest army we've had (72,000) since the beginning of the 19th century.
