|
Post by GrahamHyde on Aug 30, 2024 21:32:32 GMT
Cannon Mmaee Gallagher Ennis Tezgel
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Aug 30, 2024 21:47:44 GMT
Cannon Mmaee Gallagher Ennis Tezgel Absolutely no way is Ennis above anyone in the pecking order
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 30, 2024 21:48:30 GMT
Cannon Mmaee Gallagher Ennis Tezgel Absolutely no way is Ennis above anyone in the pecking order He already has been above Tezgel this season. Hence why my views about these things are what they are.
|
|
|
Post by headsgoup on Aug 31, 2024 9:15:14 GMT
Real front 3 on rotation: 1. Cannon 2. Mmae 3. Tezgel Wide -forwards 4. Koumas/Gallagher 5. My Nan 6. Ennis I really dont see Gallagher playing up top on his own bar a really difficult away game we need just a lump upfront. I really think he will start alongside one of the other strikers. Koumas will be interchangeable from left wing and striker as needs be. The real battle will be between Mmae/Tezgel for who is first replacement sub. They look about the same level of player at the minute so let them fight it out for 2nd choice to Cannon. I didn't know your nan was back to full fitness.
|
|
|
Post by pavel on Aug 31, 2024 9:43:01 GMT
As pure strikers, not wide men
Cannon (let's see how he goes in a Stoke team though) Mmaee Tezgel Gallagher Ennis (though I'd rather not bother, I'd play a false nine first)
Koumas has shown he can do a job there but I would prefer him wide.
It's going to be quite interesting with Junho, Koumas and Manhoef vying for wide positions, for me at the moment Koumas and Manhoef would edge it because of their goal threat. Hopefully Junho would slip into AM, he's got to play for me. Interesting times.
|
|
|
Post by thedeadlyshart on Aug 31, 2024 16:46:52 GMT
Starting: Cannon Gallagher Mmaee Koumas Tezgel
Sub when we need a goal: Gallagher Mmaee Tezgel
Sub when we close up shop: Gallagher Ennis Mmaee
|
|
|
Post by mystokebadge on Sept 1, 2024 16:19:40 GMT
Goals will dictate who our strikers are, if those who are selected do the business and score goal they will keep their place and them on the bench will have to bide their time. If however those selected do not perform goals , assists , hold up play and lose their place to the bench the subs will have to perform to keep their shirts .
|
|
|
Post by stokeymad on Sept 2, 2024 8:24:41 GMT
Cannon Koumas Gallagher Tezgel/Ennis subs - dependent on if chasing or defending ----- Bring back Lowe from loan Dust your boots off SJW Could the kitman do a job? What about the fat bloke in row G eating the Wright's Pie? Anybody? Fine, Mmaee.
|
|
|
Post by yellowsnowman on Sept 2, 2024 9:00:04 GMT
Cannon Mmaee Gallagher Tezgel
Enniss
|
|
|
Post by stokefanone on Sept 2, 2024 10:01:14 GMT
Don’t know much about cannon at the moment. Very little history to go on! What was his stats during youth football?
Galley is a proven support striker at this level. Koumas is a brill prospect and will be a prem player. Mmae does not have the desire to be successful at this level. Ennis can only be a late sub to help see games out. Tezgel needs to be involved in first team football. I think it depends how cannon performs. If cannon is successful here, then I think emre will go out on loan in jan.
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on Sept 2, 2024 14:38:14 GMT
Why not if hes playing better?? Junho is still not up to speed this season - Koumas is ready and raring to go as is Cannon I suspect. Koumas looks like a great winger WITH goals from the left-wing. Im sorry but Junho just doesnt offer that YET. He is a tidy player but he really needs to up his assists/goals output this season. Because he’s not our player and I don’t give a shit about his development if I’m being totally honest. Koumas looks great. But we have two class wide players who need the game time more, who are both very good and who can both make us a fortune. And when we get the money what then? Money isn't the issue - unless we do better we won't attract better players and we won't do better if we bench better players in order to possibly make money in a few years time. You play your best players in the here and now to maximise your chances of success not gamble on ifs buts and maybes in the future.
|
|
|
Post by mks1958 on Sept 2, 2024 14:52:04 GMT
Cannon Mmaee Gallagher Ennis Tezgel Ennis ahead of Tezgel, I don't think so.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 2, 2024 15:39:49 GMT
Cannon Mmaee Gallagher Ennis Tezgel Ennis ahead of Tezgel, I don't think so. But he clearly is?
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Sept 2, 2024 16:57:10 GMT
Is Cannon injured yet?
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 2, 2024 17:05:08 GMT
Ennis ahead of Tezgel, I don't think so. But he clearly is? How do you work that out? Tezgel had more minutes than Ennis this season
|
|
|
Post by middleoftheboothen on Sept 2, 2024 17:09:04 GMT
Real front 3 on rotation: 1. Cannon 2. Mmae 3. Tezgel Wide -forwards 4. Koumas/Gallagher 5. My Nan 6. Ennis I really dont see Gallagher playing up top on his own bar a really difficult away game we need just a lump upfront. I really think he will start alongside one of the other strikers. Koumas will be interchangeable from left wing and striker as needs be. The real battle will be between Mmae/Tezgel for who is first replacement sub. They look about the same level of player at the minute so let them fight it out for 2nd choice to Cannon. I didn't know your nan was back to full fitness. I have it on good information from a legit ITK that she is now back on the grass training with the squad.
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Sept 5, 2024 6:52:16 GMT
Seems Ryan was further down the order than people thought and himself !
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Sept 5, 2024 6:59:34 GMT
Seems Ryan was further down the order than people thought and himself ! I think it was just a case that someone wanted him and no one wanted Ennis.
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Sept 5, 2024 8:13:19 GMT
Seems Ryan was further down the order than people thought and himself ! I think it was just a case that someone wanted him and no one wanted Ennis. Article saying he had chat with SS about where he was seen in pecking order and suddenly gone. Says it all really. Bad mistake Mmaee.
|
|
|
Post by SamB_SCFC on Sept 5, 2024 8:21:03 GMT
I think Ennis actually has a useful role as someone to bring on to help see things out. His energy and running is very useful at the end of games when you're protecting a lead and there isn't really anyone else in the squad who offers that. So while I don't see him as an option for scoring goals, which is obvious a joke for a striker, I do think he still has his uses as a 'defensive striker' to help us see our games where we have a narrow lead. For me, he has more use to us than Mmae.
|
|
|
Post by Glory Hunter on Sept 5, 2024 8:22:52 GMT
Until a couple of weeks ago, it was Tezgel, my mate Ade (who used to play years ago and liked to attack the near post), Ennis, then Mmaee.
Now, thankfully it’s all been transformed!
|
|
|
Post by premieraj on Sept 5, 2024 8:28:42 GMT
I wonder if they may get a behind closed door game to get Canon going?
|
|
|
Post by senojbor on Sept 5, 2024 8:42:51 GMT
Ennis is a dud. Gallagher's scoring record for a CF at Blackburn is 1 in 5 Cannon is 1 in 6 for Leicester However, we are hoping Canon can do better, but we don't know yet if he will. Strangely, Lowe an Mmaee have been loaned out (who are better than Gallagher and Ennis) So that leaves Tezgel and the unproven Cannon for a starting place.
|
|
|
Post by senojbor on Sept 5, 2024 8:44:09 GMT
I wonder if they may get a behind closed door game to get Canon going? I would imagine he'll start against Fleetwood
|
|
|
Post by AlliG on Sept 5, 2024 11:07:28 GMT
Ennis is a dud. Gallagher's scoring record for a CF at Blackburn is 1 in 5 Cannon is 1 in 6 for Leicester However, we are hoping Canon can do better, but we don't know yet if he will. Strangely, Lowe an Mmaee have been loaned out (who are better than Gallagher and Ennis) So that leaves Tezgel and the unproven Cannon for a starting place. You appear highly dubious about the goalscoring ability of both Cannon and Gallagher but consider it strange that 1 goal Nathan Lowe has been allowed to go out on loan. A year in a lower Division where he will hopefully continue to scoring start looks just the ticket for Nathan Lowe.
|
|
|
Post by apb1 on Sept 5, 2024 11:17:21 GMT
I wonder if they may get a behind closed door game to get Canon going? I would imagine he'll start against Fleetwood I reckon he'll start at Oxford. He's the number 9, presumably had a whole pre-season at Leicester and two weeks to work with our coaches. They might play Koumas in the middle but I reckon big Tom will get the nod.
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 5, 2024 11:22:18 GMT
I would imagine he'll start against Fleetwood I reckon he'll start at Oxford. He's the number 9, presumably had a whole pre-season at Leicester and two weeks to work with our coaches. They might play Koumas in the middle but I reckon big Tom will get the nod. Unless there is a fitness issue will be shocked if Cannon doesn't start v Oxford
|
|
|
Post by apb1 on Sept 5, 2024 11:26:37 GMT
I reckon he'll start at Oxford. He's the number 9, presumably had a whole pre-season at Leicester and two weeks to work with our coaches. They might play Koumas in the middle but I reckon big Tom will get the nod. Unless there is a fitness issue will be shocked if Cannon doesn't start v Oxford Yeah, he's effectively our marquee signing this summer isn't he? Even though he's a loanee.
|
|
|
Post by Glory Hunter on Sept 5, 2024 12:09:14 GMT
I would imagine he'll start against Fleetwood I reckon he'll start at Oxford. He's the number 9, presumably had a whole pre-season at Leicester and two weeks to work with our coaches. They might play Koumas in the middle but I reckon big Tom will get the nod. Would be amazed if he didn’t start at Oxford.
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Sept 5, 2024 14:18:15 GMT
I reckon he'll start at Oxford. He's the number 9, presumably had a whole pre-season at Leicester and two weeks to work with our coaches. They might play Koumas in the middle but I reckon big Tom will get the nod. Would be amazed if he didn’t start at Oxford. I would like to see Cannon and Koumas playing up top together at some point.
|
|