|
Post by prestwichpotter on Jul 25, 2024 15:37:04 GMT
2024/25 Stoke City Squad Numbers
1. Viktor Johansson (GK) 2. Lynden Gooch 3. Enda Stevens 4. Ben Pearson 5. Michael Rose 6. Wouter Burger 7. André Vidigal 8. Lewis Baker 9. 10. Bae Junho 11. 12. Daniel Johnson 13. Jack Bonham (GK) 14. Niall Ennis 15. Jordan Thompson 16. Ben Wilmot 17. Eric Bocat 18. 19. Ryan Mmaee 20. 21. Nikola Jojić 22. Junior Tchamadeu 23. Ben Gibson 24. 25. 26. 27. Mehdi Léris 28. Josh Laurent 29. 30. Sol Sidibe 31. 32. 33. 34. Frank Fielding (GK) 35. Nathan Lowe 36. 37. Emre Tezgel 38. 39. 40. 41. Jaden Dixon 42. Million Manhoef
|
|
|
Post by gingerninja on Jul 25, 2024 15:40:30 GMT
Lots of blank spaces, no 9 is interesting 🤔
|
|
|
Post by liathroid on Jul 25, 2024 15:46:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by RWChris on Jul 25, 2024 15:49:22 GMT
Surprised Jojic has retained a squad number
|
|
|
Post by dirtygary69 on Jul 25, 2024 15:55:14 GMT
Manhoef 11 would have been nice. Is 42 "his" number?
|
|
|
Post by femark on Jul 25, 2024 16:03:26 GMT
Manhoef 11 would have been nice. Is 42 "his" number? It was 42 at Vitesse as well. Maybe he's a big fan of The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy?
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Jul 25, 2024 16:11:52 GMT
Lots of blank spaces, no 9 is interesting 🤔 Yeh dead interesting
|
|
|
Post by thornestein on Jul 25, 2024 16:14:03 GMT
Surprised Jojic has retained a squad number he doesn’t take a space in 25 man squad becaue of age , so no harm giving him a number
|
|
|
Post by canadianmoose on Jul 25, 2024 16:39:13 GMT
Manhoef 11 would have been nice. Is 42 "his" number? It was 42 at Vitesse as well. Maybe he's a big fan of The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy? He must be. 42 is the answer 😄
|
|
|
Post by dirtygary69 on Jul 25, 2024 19:52:43 GMT
Manhoef 11 would have been nice. Is 42 "his" number? It was 42 at Vitesse as well. Maybe he's a big fan of The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy? Either that or The Kumars, I suppose
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jul 25, 2024 22:01:32 GMT
is there any significance with the numbers?
I'm a little surprised to see Baker at 8, and Gooch at 2, 102 would be more fitting, though he definitely tries I'll give him that.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jul 25, 2024 22:10:49 GMT
is there any significance with the numbers? I'm a little surprised to see Baker at 8, and Gooch at 2, 102 would be more fitting, though he definitely tries I'll give him that. If Goochy is our chosen and preferred right back we're in big trouble.
|
|
|
Post by datguy on Jul 25, 2024 22:43:44 GMT
Manhoef 11 would have been nice. Is 42 "his" number? Yes, he lived in Fallowfield during his student days.
|
|
|
Post by walrus on Jul 26, 2024 7:09:35 GMT
is there any significance with the numbers? I'm a little surprised to see Baker at 8, and Gooch at 2, 102 would be more fitting, though he definitely tries I'll give him that. It’s very rare for players to have numbers taken away from them. Gooch and Baker were incumbent at 2 and 8 and that’s all there is to it. You can read into the gaps and reassignments but not the existing numbers.
|
|
|
Post by silsdenstokie on Jul 26, 2024 9:05:36 GMT
All eyes on Number 9!
|
|