|
|
Post by jokker on Apr 29, 2024 18:16:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by eddyclamp on Apr 29, 2024 18:19:18 GMT
I can see all the big clubs lawyers already looking to find loopholes in it.
|
|
|
|
Post by jokker on Apr 29, 2024 18:26:58 GMT
I can see all the big clubs lawyers already looking to find loopholes in it. Apparently clubs like Arsenal, Spurs, Liverpool, all big clubs, were in favour of it. And Cheslea weren't against it, but abstained from voting. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Apr 29, 2024 18:33:06 GMT
I can see all the big clubs lawyers already looking to find loopholes in it. Apparently clubs like Arsenal, Spurs, Liverpool, all big clubs, were in favour of it. And Cheslea weren't against it, but abstained from voting. Yeh citeh, united and villa voted against |
|
|
|
Post by canadianmoose on Apr 29, 2024 19:41:29 GMT
Nice for all the clubs that have already assembled billions in playing assets. Not so much fun for those at the bottom of the pile or those who get promoted.
|
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Apr 30, 2024 8:09:18 GMT
Nice for all the clubs that have already assembled billions in playing assets. Not so much fun for those at the bottom of the pile or those who get promoted. That’s why its clever another attempt to ruin the pyramid opportunity and risk , really suits the likes of palace etc too . and maintains the status quo |
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Apr 30, 2024 9:54:18 GMT
Let me get this right……"PL clubs deciding on proposals that include spending being capped to between four and five times the amount the lowest-earning Premier League club receives in TV revenue." So last season the TV revenue lowest earning club was Leeds with £112m meaning that other clubs can spend up to £560m. How the flying fuck is that a spending cap that benefits all the PL clubs? Try telling the likes of Luton, Brighton, Wolves, Fulham & Brentford etc that they’re allowed to spend over half a billion. Another one from the mighty & righteous good ideas club no doubt. Fuck them all off to European super league so we can have a competitive league system.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Apr 30, 2024 9:56:08 GMT
It's just another rule smartarses will find ways to get around.
|
|
|
|
Post by apb1 on Apr 30, 2024 10:13:34 GMT
Surely it would be good for us? A spend of 500m a season would allow us to spaff colossal sums on dross/superstars if we were in the Prem. Were we not owned by billionaires wanting to buy success (as opposed to a lot of other owners) it would be a barrier, but for Stoke Bet365 City removing the tie to total revenue would be good - no Euro cups no big gate receipts etc for us. Would be a good test for Denise's dong. Just the small matter of getting up there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Squeekster on Apr 30, 2024 10:21:58 GMT
They were chewing the fat over it last night on 5live and the expert basically reckons it will change little only the fact that the clubs that sell the most merchandise will be better off.
|
|
|
|
Post by thornestein on Apr 30, 2024 10:46:02 GMT
Let me get this right……"PL clubs deciding on proposals that include spending being capped to between four and five times the amount the lowest-earning Premier League club receives in TV revenue." So last season the TV revenue lowest earning club was Leeds with £112m meaning that other clubs can spend up to £560m. How the flying fuck is that a spending cap that benefits all the PL clubs? Try telling the likes of Luton, Brighton, Wolves, Fulham & Brentford etc that they’re allowed to spend over half a billion. Another one from the mighty & righteous good ideas club no doubt. Fuck them all off to European super league so we can have a competitive league system. that spending includes lots of things not just transfers , considering Man City’s wage bill is supposed to be £350mil + , that’s not a lot left for transfers considering todays prices |
|
|
|
Post by RF10 on Apr 30, 2024 10:54:02 GMT
It's pointless. All changes very little and further the gap between 'Big Clubs' and the rest.
|
|
|
|
Post by thornestein on Apr 30, 2024 11:12:00 GMT
It's pointless. All changes very little and further the gap between 'Big Clubs' and the rest. exactly , hence why they should go back how it’s always been , if they have the money let them spend it , it helps lower league teams who can sell there players to a league higher instead of buying abroad , them punish teams who go into debt and financial mismanagement |
|
|
|
Post by anchorman on Apr 30, 2024 11:13:08 GMT
I can see all the big clubs lawyers already looking to find loopholes in it. Their lawyers will have already found the loopholes, probably before the announcement! |
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Apr 30, 2024 11:14:57 GMT
Teams already in the Prem,should have a spending cap,but teams promoted,in their 1st season should be allowed to spend more if they have it.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokiemac on Apr 30, 2024 11:18:27 GMT
I was hearing that the loophole will be that breaching the cap results in a "luxury tax" which essentially makes the cap pointless for clubs backed by Qatar/Saudi etc
|
|
|
|
Post by wakefieldstokie on Apr 30, 2024 11:25:50 GMT
Absolutely pointless. Money talks and as sure as night and day a ‘work a round’ will be in place 30seconds after they implement the cap.
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Apr 30, 2024 11:34:48 GMT
The cap is a multiple of the income received by the poorest team in the Prem.
The key factor is the size of the multiplication factor. 4.5 was initially suggested which would catch out 2 or 3 of the big spenders. However, 5 is now the likely value which would affect no clubs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Apr 30, 2024 11:36:49 GMT
The cap is a multiple of the income received by the poorest team in the Prem. The key factor is the size of the multiplication factor. 4.5 was initially suggested which would catch out 2 or 3 of the big spenders. However, 5 is now the likely value which would affect no clubs. Only Chelsea have gone over if the multiple is 5. No surprise there. |
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Apr 30, 2024 11:58:53 GMT
It’s not going to much and actually probably works in favour of the bigger clubs in the league.
I’m getting pretty despondent with the way football is heading and think the ones that wanted to fuck off to the Super League should just go ahead and do it and let the rest of us in the football leagues get on with things so we can all agree on a more level playing field.
It’s inevitable it’s just a matter of time.
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Apr 30, 2024 12:12:39 GMT
The cap is a multiple of the income received by the poorest team in the Prem. The key factor is the size of the multiplication factor. 4.5 was initially suggested which would catch out 2 or 3 of the big spenders. However, 5 is now the likely value which would affect no clubs. Only Chelsea have gone over if the multiple is 5. No surprise there. Only just, mate and how much have they spent - £1B? |
|
