|
|
Post by liathroid on Feb 4, 2023 14:00:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Feb 4, 2023 14:02:38 GMT
352
Celina as number 10
|
|
|
|
Post by questionable on Feb 4, 2023 14:02:52 GMT
Ad good as it gets for now
|
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 4, 2023 14:02:52 GMT
3 at the back.
2-1 (Gayle, Brown)
|
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Feb 4, 2023 14:03:41 GMT
So kind of a 3-4-1-2?
|
|
|
|
Post by robrigo on Feb 4, 2023 14:04:43 GMT
The bench really highlights the massive job ahead in the summer.
|
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Feb 4, 2023 14:04:50 GMT
Is that 433 with Tymon & Gale either side of Brown or 3CB's with Tymon and Sterling WB's ? I'll give him one thing it's never easy to predict.
|
|
|
|
Post by clarkeda on Feb 4, 2023 14:04:53 GMT
That’s a risk for me, but I suppose if any of the back 3 get injured we can shift to a 4.
Looks about as good as it gets, happy with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by robrigo on Feb 4, 2023 14:04:54 GMT
The bench really highlights the massive job ahead in the summer.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Feb 4, 2023 14:05:04 GMT
Because we have no wingers and with Pearson out probably don't want to play 4 at the back with attacking fullbacks Thats an attacking side |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Feb 4, 2023 14:05:45 GMT
3-4-1-2 or 3-5-2. Definitely not 4 at the back. The team sheet is always in order
|
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Feb 4, 2023 14:05:57 GMT
Definitely a back three from how O'Shea has read it out
|
|
|
|
Post by 36dd on Feb 4, 2023 14:06:45 GMT
343?
|
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 4, 2023 14:07:56 GMT
Because we have no wingers and with Pearson out probably don't want to play 4 at the back with attacking fullbacks Thats an attacking side You don’t need wingers to play 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 you need wide midlfielders/forwards of which we have plenty…… |
|
|
|
Post by leesandfordstoupe on Feb 4, 2023 14:08:03 GMT
3-4-1-2 or 3-5-2. Definitely not 4 at the back. The team sheet is always in order I obviously don't understand the order. |
|
|
|
Post by bridgnorthstokie on Feb 4, 2023 14:08:13 GMT
The bench really highlights the massive job ahead in the summer. I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Feb 4, 2023 14:08:17 GMT
Unbelievable, he’s dropped Smallbone
|
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Feb 4, 2023 14:08:33 GMT
Definitely a back three from how O'Shea has read it out No doubt about it |
|
|
|
Post by bridgnorthstokie on Feb 4, 2023 14:08:56 GMT
The bench really highlights the massive job ahead in the summer. I also agree with this. |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Feb 4, 2023 14:09:42 GMT
Because we have no wingers and with Pearson out probably don't want to play 4 at the back with attacking fullbacks Thats an attacking side You don’t need wingers to play 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3 you need wide midlfielders/forwards of which we have plenty…… Without Pearson I the fullbacks would be cautious in this system 5 of the outfield players are committed to getting forward plus Baker can support and shoot |
|
|
|
Post by questionable on Feb 4, 2023 14:09:51 GMT
Because we have no wingers and with Pearson out probably don't want to play 4 at the back with attacking fullbacks Thats an attacking side It does seem absolutely insane that we’ve made two loan signings who’re not fit, stinks of desperation and inept management more so given where we are in the league and shocking football on display 99% of the time. |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Feb 4, 2023 14:09:56 GMT
3-4-1-2 or 3-5-2. Definitely not 4 at the back. The team sheet is always in order I obviously don't understand the order. Always reads right to left in order of position |
|
|
|
Post by shakermaker on Feb 4, 2023 14:10:23 GMT
Seems more likely, one that could merge into a 3-4-3 as well to allow Celina to drift to and in from the wing as another attacking option. If Laurent can maintain his form and allow Baker to advance, this is a good side. |
|
|
|
Post by a on Feb 4, 2023 14:10:42 GMT
Why no Pearson? Any reason?
|
|
|
|
Post by nott1 on Feb 4, 2023 14:10:51 GMT
Unbelievable, he’s dropped Smallbone About time too! |
|
|
|
Post by iamstokie on Feb 4, 2023 14:11:49 GMT
Why no Pearson? Any reason? Injured |
|
|
|
Post by harryh157 on Feb 4, 2023 14:11:57 GMT
Why no Pearson? Any reason? Was wondering the same. Seems he's injured - already |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Feb 4, 2023 14:12:01 GMT
Why no Pearson? Any reason? He's not fit |
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Feb 4, 2023 14:12:26 GMT
Why no Pearson? Any reason? Out for "about 7 days" with "a niggle" according to Neil yesterday |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Feb 4, 2023 14:12:47 GMT
Seems more likely, one that could merge into a 3-4-3 as well to allow Celina to drift to and in from the wing as another attacking option. If Laurent can maintain his form and allow Baker to advance, this is a good side. Yes there is a lot on those two today |
|
