|
Post by thornestein on Jan 7, 2024 15:32:54 GMT
Let’s get the facts right . First goal McNally only partially closed down . Wasn’t brave enough to take one for the team . Semi turned his back . Second goal . Iversen rushed out of his goal to handle a through ball . Clearly wasn’t going to make it and McNally came to his rescue and conceded a corner . Iversen acknowledged his error to McNally . Then we didn’t challenge a short corner routine and they scored . Impossible to defend against a centre so close to goal . Indeed a few minutes later they did the same . This was a tactical error as Brighton did a short corner routine in the first half . It should have been sorted then . Third goal McNally body position wrong but Iversen should have saved . To understand that you have to see the replay from behind the goal . Fourth goal Hoever wrong side of his man as has been stated . So Iversen could have done better for goals two and three . in your opinion
|
|
|
Post by ceejays on Jan 7, 2024 15:46:29 GMT
I accept that it’s my opinion Iversen should have saved goal 3 but you do have to see from behind the goal . All the other points are just simply as it happened. Watch on fa cup replay stream at your leisure
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 7, 2024 15:47:55 GMT
I accept that it’s my opinion Iversen should have saved goal 3 but you do have to see from behind the goal . All the other points are just simply as it happened. Watch on fa cup replay stream at your leisure Absolute nonsense 🤣
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 7, 2024 16:51:56 GMT
What did you make of his debut then Dave? Absolutely no idea mate. I wasn't there and haven't seen any of the game aside from the goals. Impossible to comment for me.
|
|
|
Post by gingerninja on Jan 7, 2024 16:58:27 GMT
Fair enough Dave.👍
|
|
|
Post by jokker on Jan 7, 2024 18:19:03 GMT
Doesn’t really set a good precedent, does it? Bonham hasn’t done much wrong in the last few games. Throwing in Iversen (who did plenty wrong vs Brighton) seems unjust. Bonham should be out when he next drops a clanger. Yea I get that. But we’ve not got Iverson in to sit on the bench, harsh but we need him straight in. Plus Iversen hopes to make it into the Euros with Denmark (which I doubt he will with several other young keepers playing in top leagues also making claims to support Schmeichel who apparently is undropable). Still he definitely won't be considered unless he plays on a regular basis.
|
|
|
Post by nott1 on Jan 8, 2024 18:29:36 GMT
Get rid....he just let four in!
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 8, 2024 18:50:39 GMT
Certainly wasn't an outstanding debut and hopefully a touch of rustiness.
However.. I would have played Bonham. Just to say "the shirt's yours to lose"
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Jan 8, 2024 21:52:54 GMT
Certainly wasn't an outstanding debut and hopefully a touch of rustiness. However.. I would have played Bonham. Just to say "the shirt's yours to lose" No way Iverson was coming here on loan to be a substitute. He was intended to fill the number 1 slot and that would be why he wanted to come here. Whether you agree with that is another matter but that will be why he's here at all.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 8, 2024 21:54:16 GMT
Certainly wasn't an outstanding debut and hopefully a touch of rustiness. However.. I would have played Bonham. Just to say "the shirt's yours to lose" No way Iverson was coming here on loan to be a substitute. He was intended to fill the number 1 slot and that would be why he wanted to come here. Whether you agree with that is another matter but that will be why he's here at all. What happens if he's a bag of shite then?
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Jan 8, 2024 21:58:31 GMT
No way Iverson was coming here on loan to be a substitute. He was intended to fill the number 1 slot and that would be why he wanted to come here. Whether you agree with that is another matter but that will be why he's here at all. What happens if he's a bag of shite then? He gets dropped I would think. But none the less there's no way he came here to warm the subs bench from the outset.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 8, 2024 22:04:44 GMT
What happens if he's a bag of shite then? He gets dropped I would think. But none the less there's no way he came here to warm the subs bench from the outset. Yes... I get that. But perhaps it would have been good for Jack's confidence if he had at least been given the cup game considering also how little Iversen had with the team on the grass.
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Jan 8, 2024 22:13:22 GMT
He gets dropped I would think. But none the less there's no way he came here to warm the subs bench from the outset. Yes... I get that. But perhaps it would have been good for Jack's confidence if he had at least been given the cup game considering also how little Iversen had with the team on the grass. Yes that may have been the decent thing to do but I guess the manager was thinking it was a chance to blood the new guy in a 'less important' game, rather than putting him straight into a league match. Our season is in a precarious position right now so I think the decision made alot of sense from a managerial perspective. The only thing is that letting in 4 may possibly have dented his confidence somewhat, although we must hope that is not so as Iversen has proven to be a fine keeper in the past. A possible bonus to Bonham is that he may feel now, that after Saturday's result that he's still in with a shout of regaining the number 1 spot and that could actually inspire him rather than demotivate him.
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Jan 8, 2024 22:14:09 GMT
He gets dropped I would think. But none the less there's no way he came here to warm the subs bench from the outset. Yes... I get that. But perhaps it would have been good for Jack's confidence if he had at least been given the cup game considering also how little Iversen had with the team on the grass. The trouble with that is how do you bed Iversen in then if you don't play him against Brighton? It's not like an outfield player where you can give him half an hour as sub then an hour from the start. The alternative is to chuck him in against Rotherham and suffer his rustiness in a far more crucial game.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 8, 2024 22:21:21 GMT
Yes... I get that. But perhaps it would have been good for Jack's confidence if he had at least been given the cup game considering also how little Iversen had with the team on the grass. Yes that may have been the decent thing to do but I guess the manager was thinking it was a chance to blood the new guy in a 'less important' game, rather than putting him straight into a league match. Our season is in a precarious position right now so I think the decision made alot of sense from a managerial perspective. The only thing is that letting in 4 may possibly have dented his confidence somewhat, although we must hope that is not so as Iversen has proven to be a fine keeper in the past. A possible bonus to Bonham is that he may feel now, that after Saturday's result that he's still in with a shout of regaining the number 1 spot and that could actually inspire him rather than demotivate him. So it could be that Iversen is a nervous wreck for Saturday 😁
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Jan 8, 2024 22:25:35 GMT
Yes that may have been the decent thing to do but I guess the manager was thinking it was a chance to blood the new guy in a 'less important' game, rather than putting him straight into a league match. Our season is in a precarious position right now so I think the decision made alot of sense from a managerial perspective. The only thing is that letting in 4 may possibly have dented his confidence somewhat, although we must hope that is not so as Iversen has proven to be a fine keeper in the past. A possible bonus to Bonham is that he may feel now, that after Saturday's result that he's still in with a shout of regaining the number 1 spot and that could actually inspire him rather than demotivate him. So it could be that Iversen is a nervous wreck for Saturday 😁 I have to say mate he doesn't look like the kind who would be a a gibbering wreck just like he doesn't look like the kind who would dwell on letting 4 in. I was a goalie myself and it was almost always one or more of my defenders fault if we let a goal in not mine. Edit in this case he'd be right because they were all down to McNally
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Jan 8, 2024 23:02:42 GMT
Yes that may have been the decent thing to do but I guess the manager was thinking it was a chance to blood the new guy in a 'less important' game, rather than putting him straight into a league match. Our season is in a precarious position right now so I think the decision made alot of sense from a managerial perspective. The only thing is that letting in 4 may possibly have dented his confidence somewhat, although we must hope that is not so as Iversen has proven to be a fine keeper in the past. A possible bonus to Bonham is that he may feel now, that after Saturday's result that he's still in with a shout of regaining the number 1 spot and that could actually inspire him rather than demotivate him. So it could be that Iversen is a nervous wreck for Saturday 😁 Naah he'll have that Scandi cool thing going on I reckon.. he must now apply it to his kicking
|
|
|
Post by Roger Everyone on Jan 13, 2024 17:36:59 GMT
Seems to have settled in nicely. Not the biggest test today, but his kicking seemed much improved from last week.
Like I have said before, when teams approach our goal, I don't have the fear that we will concede with him in goal.
|
|
|
Post by rickyfullerbeer on Jan 13, 2024 17:59:11 GMT
Does inspire confidence at all.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 13, 2024 18:38:12 GMT
His starting positions were good. He took a couple of awkward balls on the edge of his box easily. Nowt wrong with his kicking. Took the pressure off on the first long throw and Morrison then left them to Peltier.
Easy game and he made everything look very straightforward
|
|
|
Post by Ron on Jan 13, 2024 18:42:57 GMT
On a couple of occasions he got the snoozing defence out of jail being quick out to collect
|
|
|
Post by gingerninja on Jan 13, 2024 18:45:04 GMT
Dave Johnno has spoken, I am now very pro Iversen, Dave knows his onions when it comes to keeper's.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2024 18:49:32 GMT
Dave Johnno has spoken, I am now very pro Iversen, Dave knows his onions when it comes to keeper's. Ha ha, he knows no more than may and thay mar mate
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Jan 27, 2024 19:52:59 GMT
Not a fag paper between him and Bonham for me. Might as well play Bonham next game and develop one we own rather than somebody else's 4th choice.
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Jan 27, 2024 19:55:33 GMT
Not a fag paper between him and Bonham for me. Might as well play Bonham next game and develop one we own rather than somebody else's 4th choice. I’d have thought Iverson can’t play next game as they’re his parent club
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Jan 27, 2024 19:57:15 GMT
Not a fag paper between him and Bonham for me. Might as well play Bonham next game and develop one we own rather than somebody else's 4th choice. I’d have thought Iverson can’t play next game as they’re his parent club Ooops! Point still applies either way
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 27, 2024 20:00:26 GMT
Not this shit again🙄
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Jan 27, 2024 20:02:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Jan 28, 2024 10:15:55 GMT
Him and Bonham could both play in goal at the same time,and we still wouldn't keep a clean sheet.
|
|
|
Post by nigerianstokie on Jan 28, 2024 10:28:10 GMT
Not a fag paper between him and Bonham for me. Might as well play Bonham next game and develop one we own rather than somebody else's 4th choice. Bonham is nearly 30, there’s not much more developing he’s going to do. Not to mention, he’s a stonking pile of smegma.
|
|