|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Feb 19, 2022 22:13:36 GMT
I usually am and then it usually swings. We shall see. He’s just too damn negative. He needs to grow some balls soon. There was nothing negative in the way he’s set us up today in any way shape or form. Have I just read lookatmeoatcake(quoted) post he’s too negative🙄🤣🤣Fuckin clueless |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:13:51 GMT
I usually am and then it usually swings. We shall see. He’s just too damn negative. He needs to grow some balls soon. There was nothing negative in the way he’s set us up today in any way shape or form. Playing a 3 man midfield at home is negative. DWP should have been starting. Clucas shouldn’t be back up to Powell. That was negative. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2022 22:13:52 GMT
I usually am and then it usually swings. We shall see. He’s just too damn negative. He needs to grow some balls soon. There was nothing negative in the way he’s set us up today in any way shape or form. Or in his substitutions either. Haters gonna hate. |
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Feb 19, 2022 22:14:37 GMT
There was nothing negative in the way he’s set us up today in any way shape or form. Playing a 3 man midfield at home is negative. DWP should have been starting. Clucas shouldn’t be back up to Powell. That was negative. Utter rubbish |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:14:49 GMT
There was nothing negative in the way he’s set us up today in any way shape or form. Have I just read lookatmeoatcake(quoted) post he’s too negative🙄🤣🤣Fuckin clueless The bloke is scared of his own shadow. Negative subs against Forest cost us. Starting Clucas today cost us. Playing Brown cost us. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:15:08 GMT
There was nothing negative in the way he’s set us up today in any way shape or form. Or in his substitutions either. Haters gonna hate. His substitutes are massively negative 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Feb 19, 2022 22:15:31 GMT
There was nothing negative in the way he’s set us up today in any way shape or form. Have I just read lookatmeoatcake(quoted) post he’s too negative🙄🤣🤣Fuckin clueless Some folk just set their stall out and simply will not adjust their views regardless of the evidence in front of them. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:15:54 GMT
Playing a 3 man midfield at home is negative. DWP should have been starting. Clucas shouldn’t be back up to Powell. That was negative. Utter rubbish We shouldn’t be playing a 3 man flat midfield at home period. It’s negative. |
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Feb 19, 2022 22:16:17 GMT
Have I just read lookatmeoatcake(quoted) post he’s too negative🙄🤣🤣Fuckin clueless The bloke is scared of his own shadow. Negative subs against Forest cost us. Starting Clucas today cost us. Playing Brown cost us. Conceding two silly goals cost us today. If anything, we are too open at the back. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:16:20 GMT
Have I just read lookatmeoatcake(quoted) post he’s too negative🙄🤣🤣Fuckin clueless Some folk just set their stall out and simply will not adjust their views regardless of the evidence in front of them. The evidence is we’re underachieving. |
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Feb 19, 2022 22:16:38 GMT
We shouldn’t be playing a 3 man flat midfield at home period. It’s negative. You are talking crap, please stop. |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Feb 19, 2022 22:16:43 GMT
Have I just read lookatmeoatcake(quoted) post he’s too negative🙄🤣🤣Fuckin clueless Some folk just set their stall out and simply will not adjust their views regardless of the evidence in front of them. Spot on mate.attention seeking at its finest |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:16:55 GMT
The bloke is scared of his own shadow. Negative subs against Forest cost us. Starting Clucas today cost us. Playing Brown cost us. Conceding two silly goals cost us today. If anything, we are too open at the back. The goals were silly but a draw was fair. That’s poor. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2022 22:17:37 GMT
Have I just read lookatmeoatcake(quoted) post he’s too negative🙄🤣🤣Fuckin clueless The bloke is scared of his own shadow. Negative subs against Forest cost us. Starting Clucas today cost us. Playing Brown cost us. Bollocks. Our inability to defend cost us. Basic mistakes from defenders cost us. Do I think he should have started Clucas? No I don't, I hate Clucas as a footballer, but we scored 2 goals at home and that should pretty much always be enough to win a game in this division. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:17:45 GMT
We shouldn’t be playing a 3 man flat midfield at home period. It’s negative. You are talking crap, please stop. How? You don’t need a flat 3 man midfield at home. It’s negative. No one got in the spaces Powell does. |
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Feb 19, 2022 22:17:52 GMT
Some folk just set their stall out and simply will not adjust their views regardless of the evidence in front of them. The evidence is we’re underachieving. No the evidence is the last four years. 16th, 15th, 14th and 13th. Your opinion isn’t evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:18:16 GMT
The bloke is scared of his own shadow. Negative subs against Forest cost us. Starting Clucas today cost us. Playing Brown cost us. Bollocks. Our inability to defend cost us. Basic mistakes from defenders cost us. Do I think he should have started Clucas? No I don't, I hate Clucas as a footballer, but we scored 2 goals at home and that should pretty much always be enough to win a game in this division. A draw was fair. Which is poor. |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Feb 19, 2022 22:18:24 GMT
We shouldn’t be playing a 3 man flat midfield at home period. It’s negative. Totally agree, a real missed opportunity. It wasn’t hard to alter that team to win the game. Bad management unfortunately. How you can come up with that side and formation when winning is paramount is beyond me🤷🏻♂️ |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:18:41 GMT
The evidence is we’re underachieving. No the evidence is the last four years. 16th, 15th, 14th and 13th. Your opinion isn’t evidence. Reads as being stale. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2022 22:18:42 GMT
Or in his substitutions either. Haters gonna hate. His substitutes are massively negative 😂 Today? He made the change that you think he should have started with, so how's that negative? Unless of course, you're contradicting yourself as per usual. |
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Feb 19, 2022 22:19:14 GMT
You are talking crap, please stop. How? You don’t need a flat 3 man midfield at home. It’s negative. No one got in the spaces Powell does. We played three up top with a winger playing as one of our full backs. We are not set up negatively in any way. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:19:38 GMT
His substitutes are massively negative 😂 Today? He made the change that you think he should have started with, so how's that negative? Unless of course, you're contradicting yourself as per usual. Yes. Why did he wait until the 70thish minute again? Clucas needed hauling way earlier. Brown needed hooking. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2022 22:21:06 GMT
We shouldn’t be playing a 3 man flat midfield at home period. It’s negative. Totally agree, a real missed opportunity. It wasn’t hard to alter that team to win the game. Bad management unfortunately. How you can come up with that side and formation when winning is paramount is beyond me🤷🏻♂️ 4-3-3 is pretty much what everyone has been calling for isn't it Badge? Picking Clucas is always a mistake, so I'll mark him down for that. Can't knock O'Neil for defenders making stupid mistakes at crucial times though. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:21:20 GMT
How? You don’t need a flat 3 man midfield at home. It’s negative. No one got in the spaces Powell does. We played three up top with a winger playing as one of our full backs. We are not set up negatively in any way. We had a full back and a centre half at full back. You should have 4 attackers at home. 442/4231. Both have 4 attackers. Today was a negative set up. |
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Feb 19, 2022 22:22:00 GMT
We shouldn’t be playing a 3 man flat midfield at home period. It’s negative. Totally agree, a real missed opportunity. It wasn’t hard to alter that team to win the game. Bad management unfortunately. How you can come up with that side and formation when winning is paramount is beyond me🤷🏻♂️ What by playing three up top, and a back four consisting of a winger playing as a left back? I’d say we’ve dropped two points today by being too open if anything? |
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Feb 19, 2022 22:23:07 GMT
We played three up top with a winger playing as one of our full backs. We are not set up negatively in any way. We had a full back and a centre half at full back. You should have 4 attackers at home. 442/4231. Both have 4 attackers. Today was a negative set up. It simply wasnt. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2022 22:23:50 GMT
Bollocks. Our inability to defend cost us. Basic mistakes from defenders cost us. Do I think he should have started Clucas? No I don't, I hate Clucas as a footballer, but we scored 2 goals at home and that should pretty much always be enough to win a game in this division. A draw was fair. Which is poor. Under current circumstances I agree, a draw today was a poor result. It wasn't because of a negative mindset from our manager though. You're taking shit. |
|
|
|
Post by Han Solo on Feb 19, 2022 22:23:55 GMT
We look dour without Powell in midfield, even Baker has caught the giving the ball away cheaply virus Think Moore should come in on Wednesday You’d have thought given Powell’s atrocious games played ratio we’d have a plan in place to play without him. It’s getting tiresome the amount of games he’s missed, for me he’s not a massive game changer, Fuller was injury prone but he was a massive game changer for us. I’d imagine it’s Vrancic then Sawyers. Both are unfortunately injured. That said he should have gone 4231 today and not picked Clucas. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 19, 2022 22:24:03 GMT
We had a full back and a centre half at full back. You should have 4 attackers at home. 442/4231. Both have 4 attackers. Today was a negative set up. It simply wasnt. It was. The midfielders weren’t supporting the attackers. The full backs weren’t supporting the attackers. It was disjointed shite. |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Feb 19, 2022 22:24:17 GMT
Totally agree, a real missed opportunity. It wasn’t hard to alter that team to win the game. Bad management unfortunately. How you can come up with that side and formation when winning is paramount is beyond me🤷🏻♂️ 4-3-3 is pretty much what everyone has been calling for isn't it Badge? Picking Clucas is always a mistake, so I'll mark him down for that. Can't knock O'Neil for defenders making stupid mistakes at crucial times though. Clucas is the key to the shit show unfortunately. Picking DWP from the start changes the dynamic. We started badly and we’re catching up from then |
|
