|
Post by eddyclamp on Jun 16, 2008 20:02:09 GMT
See tonights Sentinel page 20.This council have given the Kismet in Burslem £400k to "upgrade a listed building"The kitchen has been improved and seating increased from42 to 70.Councillor Mohammed Pervez says the restaurant could play a part in plans to encourage more visitors to the Mother town. The owner of this place has had it since 1962,so you would have thought if the place wanted extending then he could, after all this time, done it himself. I see this as an absolute waste of public money,and another example of how this council pisses money up the wall. How many changing facilities could kids have at parks for £400k? The bloke who owns the Kismet must have thought it was Christmas when that fell in his lap. Never mind eh,they will soon send the pond life down the Britt to book a few cars and swell the coffers. rant over. P.S.I am not a racist,just a realist.Stoke on Trent Council hang your heads in shame.
|
|
|
Post by bettyswallocks on Jun 16, 2008 21:04:46 GMT
The whole of burslem needs doing up. Renew the place, put a few decent shops in the place and get the market going strong on a friday. Some bloody good pubs in burselm, whether vale or not you can have a cracking night on a saturday many a lock in with karaoke and live entertainment etc, get thee sens down one nate
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Jun 17, 2008 6:04:16 GMT
£400k for a business is bad, I bet the local rivals start goinmg cap in hand now. I went the Kismet once many years ago, it was dirty and the food shite, never again.
|
|
|
Post by pattayapotter on Jun 17, 2008 7:28:52 GMT
heard many bad things about that place
|
|
|
Post by vote for pedro on Jun 17, 2008 8:29:26 GMT
drop a bomb on the place, i hate burslum get all the stokies out first though
|
|
|
Post by TheDee51 on Jun 17, 2008 8:43:59 GMT
Is it just a coincidence that the local MP that pushed the money through is Muslim???
Stoke Council strike again - disgraceful !!
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Jun 17, 2008 9:42:38 GMT
Is it just a coincidence that the local MP that pushed the money through is Muslim??? Stoke Council strike again - disgraceful !! I didn't know that Joan Walley had converted to Islam ???
|
|
|
Post by TheDee51 on Jun 17, 2008 9:50:19 GMT
Burslem South councillor Mohammed Pervez said the restaurant could play a part in plans to encourage more visitors into the Mother Town.
Nothing about Joan Walley mate.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 17, 2008 10:43:27 GMT
Burslem South councillor Mohammed Pervez said the restaurant could play a part in plans to encourage more visitors into the Mother Town. Nothing about Joan Walley mate. You're right and nothing about the local MP either of course. I'm sure you also thought it a disgrace when a council led by a Stoke fan approved and contributed several million pounds to the building of a football stadium..........
|
|
|
Post by TheDee51 on Jun 17, 2008 10:47:57 GMT
Don't sprout bollocks mate.
Two totally different situations and you know it.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 17, 2008 11:15:20 GMT
Don't sprout bollocks mate. Two totally different situations and you know it. I have no intention of sprouting bollocks but thanks for the advice anyway Why is it a totally different situation ? Some other facts you may want to consider before going into one it's £40k not £400k they received It's also an Indian restaurant which in case you're not aware India is not a Muslim country If you think there is some wrongdoing why not get your crayons out and write to the sentinel or the local council ombudsman
|
|
|
Post by TheDee51 on Jun 17, 2008 11:22:57 GMT
[/quote]
Why is it a totally different situation ?
Some other facts you may want to consider before going into one it's £40k not £400k they received [/quote]
Its a totally different situation as the Britannia Stadium brings in a hell of a lot of revenue and tourism to the area, doesn't just host Football matches, is an asset to the county and sees hundreds of thousands of people going through the turnstiles each season. Can the same be said about a shitty little indian restaurant in Burslem? So grow up mate.
I didnt report it was £400k, the sentinel did, and are still doing on their website.
As for the wrongdoing - as the original post says - How many kids could benefit from £400k worth of renovation to the already flailing parks and open spaces???
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 17, 2008 11:38:20 GMT
Well you must have a different version of the sentinel website then as the version I have clearly states £40k.
Unless I missed something the majority of the people who visit the Britannia are local people so very little tourism there, a couple of concerts a year hardly makes it the fucking O2 arena now does it ? The majority of the revenue at the britannia stadium goes to Stoke so little benefit to the council there.
So why is it ok for the council to spend millions doing up one business's premises yet wrong for to spend £40k on anothers it's either right or wrong in principle.
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Jun 17, 2008 11:44:00 GMT
Burslem South councillor Mohammed Pervez said the restaurant could play a part in plans to encourage more visitors into the Mother Town. Nothing about Joan Walley mate. In that case, why did you not write - Is it just a coincidence that the local Councillor that pushed the money through is Muslim??? - rather than - Is it just a coincidence that the local MP that pushed the money through is Muslim??? Plus, much as I try not to agree with a Fail supporter, but as Followyoudown says, if it is an Indian restaurant could equally well be owned by a Hindhu, Buddhist, Christian, or even someone of no religious affiliation. (I am assuming that you know that Joan Walley is the MP {Member of PARLIAMENT} for Stoke North, including Burslem.)
|
|
|
Post by TheDee51 on Jun 17, 2008 11:55:40 GMT
Well you must have a different version of the sentinel website then as the version I have clearly states £40k. Unless I missed something the majority of the people who visit the Britannia are local people so very little tourism there, a couple of concerts a year hardly makes it the fucking O2 arena now does it ? The majority of the revenue at the britannia stadium goes to Stoke so little benefit to the council there. So why is it ok for the council to spend millions doing up one business's premises yet wrong for to spend £40k on anothers it's either right or wrong in principle. So where does the majority of the revenue for the Kismet go?? ;D ;D ;D So are you saying that the Kismet is on the same sort of business level as the Britannia Stadium. What an absolute pisser. (and now having seen that the Sentinel have indeed changed the £400k down to £40k as you said, it doesnt seem as bad as was first reported.)
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 17, 2008 11:58:30 GMT
/quote][Plus, much as I try not to agree with a Fail supporter, but as Followyoudown says, if it is an Indian restaurant could equally well be owned by a Hindhu, Buddhist, Christian, or even someone of no religious affiliation. /quote] FAIL SUPPORTER you best retract that vicious slur immediately or I'll smite you until my dying die ;D
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Jun 17, 2008 12:02:43 GMT
/quote][Plus, much as I try not to agree with a Fail supporter, but as Followyoudown says, if it is an Indian restaurant could equally well be owned by a Hindhu, Buddhist, Christian, or even someone of no religious affiliation. /quote] FAIL SUPPORTER you best retract that vicious slur immediately or I'll smite you until my dying die ;D I could have mistaken you for a Crwho? fan. ;D
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Jun 17, 2008 12:11:20 GMT
£400k sounds silly money but I can't see what on earth's wrong with the principle. This is a business that's kept going for many years in a town where most businesses last about 5 minutes (the food was good last time I went too), and instead of either ruining a good building in a depressed area that's still got some nice architecture left or knocking it down altogether the plan is to restore it, where's the problem with that??? And I kind of don't think we'd be having these arguments if everyone's name was Colclough...
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 17, 2008 12:12:13 GMT
[/quote]
So why is it ok for the council to spend millions doing up one business's premises yet wrong for to spend £40k on anothers it's either right or wrong in principle.
[/quote]
So where does the majority of the revenue for the Kismet go??
;D ;D ;D So are you saying that the Kismet is on the same sort of business level as the Britannia Stadium.
What an absolute pisser.
(and now having seen that the Sentinel have indeed changed the £400k down to £40k as you said, it doesnt seem as bad as was first reported.)[/quote]
It would be an absolute pisser if I was suggesting that but as I clearly wasn't you must be very easily amused - the question I've asked you is whether you think it right or wrong in principle for the council to improve a businesses premises ?
It's that simple a yes or no answer some might even say a black or white issue but you've cleared that up as not being the issue for you as it was all over the amount wasn't it..........
|
|
|
Post by eddyclamp on Jun 17, 2008 12:15:32 GMT
followyoudown Can you explain to me how increasing the size of a kitchen and putting more tables and chairs in can- 1)Protect a listed building 2)Explain how a councillor can come out with such bollox as it will increase the number of people coming to the mother town.
It`s an Indian not the Ivy for fooks sake. If they can blow £40k,I know a good scout group and youth club that would like to put a hole in it.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 17, 2008 12:17:35 GMT
/quote][Plus, much as I try not to agree with a Fail supporter, but as Followyoudown says, if it is an Indian restaurant could equally well be owned by a Hindhu, Buddhist, Christian, or even someone of no religious affiliation. /quote] FAIL SUPPORTER you best retract that vicious slur immediately or I'll smite you until my dying die ;D I could have mistaken you for a Crwho? fan. ;D there's no need for language like that on this messageboard admin ban him ;D
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Jun 17, 2008 12:23:08 GMT
By no means an expert on the subject, but if it is as is stated a "listed building" there may be government regulation that require the Council to help fund any work that would apply whoever was the owner.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 17, 2008 12:28:39 GMT
followyoudown Can you explain to me how increasing the size of a kitchen and putting more tables and chairs in can- 1)Protect a listed building 2)Explain how a councillor can come out with such bollox as it will increase the number of people coming to the mother town. It`s an Indian not the Ivy for fooks sake. If they can blow £40k,I know a good scout group and youth club that would like to put a hole in it. Eddie no I can't but I also can't explain whether the council was / is under any legal obligation to maintain the building and which budget the money has come out of - has it come from local taxpayers or has it come from central government ? The council are also refurbishing the Guild Hall in Newcastle this doesn't seem to be attracting the same kind of outrage why is that ?
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Jun 17, 2008 12:31:47 GMT
followyoudown Can you explain to me how increasing the size of a kitchen and putting more tables and chairs in can- 1)Protect a listed building 2)Explain how a councillor can come out with such bollox as it will increase the number of people coming to the mother town. It`s an Indian not the Ivy for fooks sake. If they can blow £40k,I know a good scout group and youth club that would like to put a hole in it. Eddie no I can't but I also can't explain whether the council was / is under any legal obligation to maintain the building and which budget the money has come out of - has it come from local taxpayers or has it come from central government ? The council are also refurbishing the Guild Hall in Newcastle this doesn't seem to be attracting the same kind of outrage why is that ? As a resident & council tax payer of N-u-L, I only wish that Stoke-on-Trent City Council were paying for the refurbishment of the Guildhall!!
|
|
|
Post by knowingeye on Jun 17, 2008 12:32:34 GMT
What if it was paid towards saving a famous or old oatcake outlet?
|
|
|
Post by TheDee51 on Jun 17, 2008 12:38:15 GMT
"It's that simple a yes or no answer some might even say a black or white issue but you've cleared that up as not being the issue for you as it was all over the amount wasn't it.........."
Correct.
£40k is a lot different than nearly half a million.
So, don't really care now - £40k to do up a business is fair enough. But trying to justify the spend with saying it helps keep the building 'listed' is just not true - but then again, I wouldnt expect anything more from local councillors / MP's !!!
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Jun 17, 2008 12:42:36 GMT
"It's that simple a yes or no answer some might even say a black or white issue but you've cleared that up as not being the issue for you as it was all over the amount wasn't it.........." Correct. £40k is a lot different than nearly half a million. So, don't really care now - £40k to do up a business is fair enough. But trying to justify the spend with saying it helps keep the building 'listed' is just not true - but then again, I wouldnt expect anything more from local councillors / MP's !!! If you're referring to my previous comment about the "listed building" status:- 1) I wasn't trying to justify - makes no odds to me whether they spend the money or not - but simply suggesting that that might be an issue. 2) I'm not a councillor or an MP!!
|
|
|
Post by TheDee51 on Jun 17, 2008 12:48:17 GMT
"It's that simple a yes or no answer some might even say a black or white issue but you've cleared that up as not being the issue for you as it was all over the amount wasn't it.........." Correct. £40k is a lot different than nearly half a million. So, don't really care now - £40k to do up a business is fair enough. But trying to justify the spend with saying it helps keep the building 'listed' is just not true - but then again, I wouldnt expect anything more from local councillors / MP's !!! If you're referring to my previous comment about the "listed building" status:- 1) I wasn't trying to justify - makes no odds to me whether they spend the money or not - but simply suggesting that that might be an issue. 2) I'm not a councillor or an MP!! I was referencing the sentinel, not you
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2008 12:58:11 GMT
What a funny thread this has turned out to be ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Funky on Jun 17, 2008 13:15:38 GMT
I've just had a company on the phone trying to get my company to buy advertising space on the Kismet menu.
|
|