|
|
Post by Afrojack on Aug 26, 2021 11:48:26 GMT
Not seen anything and given our previous lack of sell on clauses i'm assuming not, but did we have any sell on clause in Shaq's contract?
|
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Aug 26, 2021 11:48:52 GMT
Jesus hates fucking christ
|
|
|
|
Post by zerps on Aug 26, 2021 11:49:29 GMT
Jacob brown and the argonauts
|
|
|
|
Post by santy on Aug 26, 2021 11:56:46 GMT
Given it was a release clause that was triggered with Shaqiri the answer should be no. Unless someone managed to bamboozle Liverpool during the negotiations and slip it in despite the fact they would have no need at all to agree to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by theonlooker on Aug 26, 2021 12:00:13 GMT
Unless someone managed to bamboozle Liverpool during the negotiations and slip it in...  |
|
|
|
Post by theteacher on Aug 26, 2021 12:04:35 GMT
And Liverpool have sold him for less than they paid for him from us….
I understand that in the agreement there was a 50% clause on the next transfer so Liverpool are owed around £2m from Stoke now and they are pushing hard for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by questionable on Aug 26, 2021 12:09:53 GMT
Not seen anything and given our previous lack of sell on clauses i'm assuming not, but did we have any sell on clause in Shaq's contract? Whilst we’re on the subject how come we only got a small transfer fee for him, Scholes no doubt |
|
|
|
Post by flea79 on Aug 26, 2021 12:11:32 GMT
i imagine we offered to pay a shortfall if they sold him for less than they paid...
|
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Aug 26, 2021 12:11:57 GMT
Not seen anything and given our previous lack of sell on clauses i'm assuming not, but did we have any sell on clause in Shaq's contract? Whilst we’re on the subject how come we only got a small transfer fee for him, Scholes no doubt Yeah that’ll be it |
|
