|
|
Post by iancransonsknees on Oct 26, 2024 18:43:18 GMT
Well it’s obvious you’re all starry eyed about backing a fellow lefty lawyer.😏 Both big The Last Leg fans, it's blindingly obvious. |
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Oct 26, 2024 18:47:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Oct 26, 2024 19:18:17 GMT
Well it’s obvious you’re all starry eyed about backing a fellow lefty lawyer.😏 I mean, I didn’t even vote for him. But everyone knows having a lawyer in charge makes sense. |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 26, 2024 19:21:05 GMT
Well it’s obvious you’re all starry eyed about backing a fellow lefty lawyer.😏 I mean, I didn’t even vote for him. But everyone knows having a lawyer in charge makes sense. You say you didn’t vote for him yet seem to hang on to every word he utters😏 The man doth protest too much me thinks……. |
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Oct 26, 2024 19:47:04 GMT
I mean, I didn’t even vote for him. But everyone knows having a lawyer in charge makes sense. You say you didn’t vote for him yet seem to hang on to every word he utters😏 The man doth protest too much me thinks……. Credit where credit is due. Some of the stuff he is doing seems good and in the right direction, after years of the wrong direction. But there is lots I don’t agree with. I still think the winter fuel allowance threshold for when you stop getting it is too low though, for example. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Oct 27, 2024 2:34:46 GMT
Well it’s obvious you’re all starry eyed about backing a fellow lefty lawyer.😏 I mean, I didn’t even vote for him. But everyone knows having a lawyer in charge makes sense. You've got to be joking. Having a "lawyer in charge makes sense"? Why? |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Oct 27, 2024 2:36:26 GMT
She's always been a bit thick though hasn't she. The way she turned a blind eye to what was happening in Birmingham during the recent riots was scandalous. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Oct 27, 2024 2:40:35 GMT
Austerity didn’t work last time. In fact it is a big cause of the mess. And how do you prove that your plans will 100% work before implementing them exactly? You certainly don't chuck good money after bad. Look where that's got us. This might explain my lack of faith: You employ people who know what they're doing, not SPADs or consultants or other professional grifters on the same gravy train. You hunt down the experts in their fields, pay them far more than any politician earns and ask them to at least figure you out the starter for 10. As for taxing the poor more, apparently that's what Reeves is planning to do by extending the delay on increasing the limit for taxable income until 2030. Absolute scam of a salary. Imagine being a front line nurse and then being told you're a racist bigot by someone on 5 times your salary.. P.s good to see Karol Sikora is still alive and kicking. One of the true heroes who opposed the insanity of covid lockdowns and the shutting down of the health service during the pandemic. A voice of reason during a storm of chaotic thinking. |
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Oct 27, 2024 7:15:46 GMT
I mean, I didn’t even vote for him. But everyone knows having a lawyer in charge makes sense. You've got to be joking. Having a "lawyer in charge makes sense"? Why? Because I’m one. Joking aside, I think it is crucial for politicians to have had real jobs. In my opinion you are not qualified to run a government department if you haven’t had a relevant job. Lawyer in charge of justice. Doctor or nurse in charge of health etc. So i do think Starmer’s prior work experience is better than just studying PPE at Oxford after attending some expensive private school and never having had a real job. |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Oct 27, 2024 7:42:42 GMT
Another attack on the poor and working families
Apparently according to the Sunday times reeves plans to scrap the two pound cap on bus fares
Thus greatly increasing fares which of course will affect people with lower incomes more
And in general I can’t see where it fits in with this gallop to zero emissions
|
|
|
|
Post by professorplump on Oct 27, 2024 7:57:44 GMT
Keir Starmer struggles so much with definitions. He couldn't work out what a woman was until Tony Blair explained it to him. Now his definition for working people seems to change, almost by the day.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chewbacca the Wookie on Oct 27, 2024 8:02:43 GMT
Keir Starmer struggles so much with definitions. He couldn't work out what a woman was until Tony Blair explained it to him. Now his definition for working people seems to change, almost by the day. Are you saying he’s indecisive? I’m not sure about.  |
|
|
|
Post by foghornsgleghorn on Oct 27, 2024 9:36:57 GMT
Another attack on the poor and working families Apparently according to the Sunday times reeves plans to scrap the two pound cap on bus fares Thus greatly increasing fares which of course will affect people with lower incomes more And in general I can’t see where it fits in with this gallop to zero emissions How long should the temporary £2 cap remain in place? Here are the thoughts (and fears) of operators last year: www.route-one.net/news/operators-mixed-feelings-after-latest-2-bus-fare-cap-extension/ |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Oct 27, 2024 9:43:59 GMT
You've got to be joking. Having a "lawyer in charge makes sense"? Why? Because I’m one. Joking aside, I think it is crucial for politicians to have had real jobs. In my opinion you are not qualified to run a government department if you haven’t had a relevant job. Lawyer in charge of justice. Doctor or nurse in charge of health etc. So i do think Starmer’s prior work experience is better than just studying PPE at Oxford after attending some expensive private school and never having had a real job. Ahhh this explains a lot mate 😉😊 |
|
|
|
Post by foghornsgleghorn on Oct 27, 2024 9:47:40 GMT
Keir Starmer struggles so much with definitions. He couldn't work out what a woman was until Tony Blair explained it to him. Now his definition for working people seems to change, almost by the day. Yes he's in a tangle in the same way Johnson couldn't define what constituted a lockdown party, but death and taxes are the only certainties in life. I don't remember Sunak coming under the same scrutiny on what defined a working person when he went on about lowering taxes for working people for months on end, when fiscal drag meant many working people were paying more / being pulled into paying tax/ higher tax bands |
|
|
|
Post by iancransonsknees on Oct 27, 2024 10:43:16 GMT
You certainly don't chuck good money after bad. Look where that's got us. This might explain my lack of faith: You employ people who know what they're doing, not SPADs or consultants or other professional grifters on the same gravy train. You hunt down the experts in their fields, pay them far more than any politician earns and ask them to at least figure you out the starter for 10. As for taxing the poor more, apparently that's what Reeves is planning to do by extending the delay on increasing the limit for taxable income until 2030. Absolute scam of a salary. Imagine being a front line nurse and then being told you're a racist bigot by someone on 5 times your salary.. P.s good to see Karol Sikora is still alive and kicking. One of the true heroes who opposed the insanity of covid lockdowns and the shutting down of the health service during the pandemic. A voice of reason during a storm of chaotic thinking. How racist, homophobic and misogynist must the NHS be that each NHS authority has to have these jobs and departments? It must be an awful place to work for if they're the type of people they employ, essentially your Tommy Robinson types must infest the entire organisation. I mean how would you justify it otherwise 🤷 |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Oct 27, 2024 11:04:21 GMT
Absolute scam of a salary. Imagine being a front line nurse and then being told you're a racist bigot by someone on 5 times your salary.. P.s good to see Karol Sikora is still alive and kicking. One of the true heroes who opposed the insanity of covid lockdowns and the shutting down of the health service during the pandemic. A voice of reason during a storm of chaotic thinking. How racist, homophobic and misogynist must the NHS be that each NHS authority has to have these jobs and departments? It must be an awful place to work for if they're the type of people they employ, essentially your Tommy Robinson types must infest the entire organisation. I mean how would you justify it otherwise 🤷 It's mad how every big corporate and government body going now has Chief Diversity Officers and Chief Sustainability Officers... Both big six figure packages. And people wonder how the liberal woke cult seized control of the corporate world? There's a lot of money in it, that's why. That said, hats off to them. In barely a decade they have completely infiltrated government and corporate business with their sick ideology. |
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 27, 2024 11:09:09 GMT
Absolute scam of a salary. Imagine being a front line nurse and then being told you're a racist bigot by someone on 5 times your salary.. P.s good to see Karol Sikora is still alive and kicking. One of the true heroes who opposed the insanity of covid lockdowns and the shutting down of the health service during the pandemic. A voice of reason during a storm of chaotic thinking. How racist, homophobic and misogynist must the NHS be that each NHS authority has to have these jobs and departments? It must be an awful place to work for if they're the type of people they employ, essentially your Tommy Robinson types must infest the entire organisation. I mean how would you justify it otherwise 🤷 When they interview somebody for a job it’s in front of a panel. The panel must include a person from each of the following backgrounds. BAME Physically disabled LQBTQ+ They also must hit target quotas for the above catergories. Not sure if this is for every single position but I know it exists for at least some. |
|
|
|
Post by iancransonsknees on Oct 27, 2024 15:43:47 GMT
Who are the thugs supposed to be? No doubt he'll get off with a slap on the wrist from his boss.
|
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on Oct 27, 2024 16:02:49 GMT
Who are the thugs supposed to be? No doubt he'll get off with a slap on the wrist from his boss. Done and dusted. ABH or GBH and the sack. What a moron. OS. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Oct 27, 2024 17:16:05 GMT
Absolutely huge opportunity when the inevitable by-election takes place for Reform who finished in second place here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Oct 27, 2024 17:26:28 GMT
Who are the thugs supposed to be? No doubt he'll get off with a slap on the wrist from his boss. I'm just glad this cctv has now been released. Because yesterday there was only a shorter video and he was playing the intimidation card. A regular occurrence for seemingly only labour mps. Here is his statement where he played victim This is the changed labour party. |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 27, 2024 17:53:04 GMT
Who are the thugs supposed to be? No doubt he'll get off with a slap on the wrist from his boss. Done and dusted. ABH or GBH and the sack. What a moron. OS. I can see a recall bi-election soon |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 27, 2024 17:54:46 GMT
Who are the thugs supposed to be? No doubt he'll get off with a slap on the wrist from his boss. I'm just glad this cctv has now been released. Because yesterday there was only a shorter video and he was playing the intimidation card. A regular occurrence for seemingly only labour mps. Here is his statement where he played victim This is the changed labour party. That statement appears to be before the full cctv As we discussed on the kaba thread. There is self defence legitimate Then there is a deliberate act of violence He may be lucky. He didn’t retweet somthing |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Oct 27, 2024 17:59:00 GMT
Oh dear
|
|
|
|
Post by Gawa on Oct 27, 2024 18:09:30 GMT
I'm just glad this cctv has now been released. Because yesterday there was only a shorter video and he was playing the intimidation card. A regular occurrence for seemingly only labour mps. Here is his statement where he played victim This is the changed labour party. That statement appears to be before the full cctv As we discussed on the kaba thread. There is self defence legitimate Then there is a deliberate act of violence He may be lucky. He didn’t retweet somthing It would be interesting to understand what happened beforehand because the video shared yesterday looked as though it could have been cropped and the cctv doesn't show if anything occurred before the punch either. The two videos released so far don't look good however |
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Oct 27, 2024 18:20:40 GMT
You've got to be joking. Having a "lawyer in charge makes sense"? Why? Because I’m one. Joking aside, I think it is crucial for politicians to have had real jobs. In my opinion you are not qualified to run a government department if you haven’t had a relevant job. Lawyer in charge of justice. Doctor or nurse in charge of health etc. So i do think Starmer’s prior work experience is better than just studying PPE at Oxford after attending some expensive private school and never having had a real job. Agree 100% regarding qualifications of Secretaries of State. How can a Defence Secretary one day become Education Secretary the next day. It’s bonkers but unfortunately runs rife throughout the civil service as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Oct 27, 2024 18:25:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Oct 27, 2024 18:33:26 GMT
Who are the thugs supposed to be? No doubt he'll get off with a slap on the wrist from his boss. I'm just glad this cctv has now been released. Because yesterday there was only a shorter video and he was playing the intimidation card. A regular occurrence for seemingly only labour mps. Here is his statement where he played victim This is the changed labour party. Whip has been withdrawn and he has been suspended from the party. Swift to act and rightly so. |
|
|
|
Post by Clayton Wood on Oct 27, 2024 18:33:30 GMT
|
|
