|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on May 9, 2021 22:12:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on May 9, 2021 22:21:49 GMT
Great bunch of lads......
|
|
|
Post by Jimmyg on May 9, 2021 22:48:58 GMT
Great bunch of lads...... It's all a PSYOP in my opinion,they are working with eachother in order to create the illusion that someone is to blame. Seems Orwells 1984 is the end goal to have 3 major powers in the world seemingly at war with eachother.
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on May 9, 2021 23:34:35 GMT
Sky News Australia have from what I've seen, have been the mainstream news channel/broadcaster that have discussed potential slippery slope COVID related things the most (Restrictions, Italy with Astrazeneca, Discussing Bioweaponry and recently, their suppresion strategy in light of the elections). Certainly not something the BBC would get away with! It's interesting to see the difference in their reporting on things to ours (well, Sky News Aus at least anyway).
Sky news Oz is brilliant. We can only hope this will gather more and more momentum. Its becoming so obvious that China is responsible for the lab leak. The only question is whether or not it was intentional and why they were testing this stuff in the first place. You only need to look at how sketchy the investigation has been and the fact they wouldn't let anyone in to investigate for over a year to see that something isn't right. Add into that the missing journalists who disappeared after speaking out, the completely fake death tally, the way they mysteriously eradicated covid despite having a vaccine with barely 56% efficacy and zero restrictions for months - All while conducting a mass genocide and attempting to seize Hong Kong - It's all pretty disturbing and our politicians and media need to start picking up on this story quickly. It's as though the entirety of the west is petrified of speaking out against China. Thank God for Maajid Nawaz. What I've tried to show is that focussing on China is missing the point, although convenient to distract and arrange cold war. It's a globalist deep state multinational operation. People can pretend this doesn't exist, but they are naive. Globalists have no national affinity. Fauci was funding this research then moved it to China. Whatever the use of this research, the greater plan was a scenario for control, economic crash, jabs, ID passes. I've linked all the sources, and the preplanning over the months. Rockefeller Lockstep Crimson Contagion Event 201 Spars Pandemic All can be searched, if you ignore the laughably dismissive Gates-funded 'fact-check' sites. Which do not even begin to deal with the details. They do the usual job of throwing around 'baseless' or 'debunked' without addressing the issues. Further drills for food shortages and supply chain problems and cyber attacks which will shut down infrastructure. Likely the next weapons used on the public. And China will be running the ID jab slavery passes, that people will be lining up for. If folk are still focussed on nations, they are playing Tiddlywinks, whilst globalists are playing 4D chess.
|
|
|
Post by musik on May 9, 2021 23:37:51 GMT
I got my socks on.
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on May 9, 2021 23:45:33 GMT
I'm presenting some information, you can interpret it or dismiss it however you choose. In addition to what I said, Imperial College and the strong links between Bill Gates - having regularly received his millions - who are also directly linked to the Event 201 'scenario' in September 2019, which took place at exactly the same time as the World Military Games in China. And the direct links between Imperial College and the Chinese military, which have been exposed before. And, as we know, Imperial College is strongly connected to UK policy through SAGE. And as we know, Gates as the largest funder of WHO, running this whole operation. I can't even be bothered to post links, because they are ignored, but the information readily available in the public domain. Whatever the interpretation, the transnational connections, coincidences, or conflicts of interest are there to see. Globalist collaboration and not confined to a single nation. It's murky, at best. You're not just presenting information. You are presenting information in a way in to tell a particular story. All I have done is point out that the information does not necessarily support your story - in fact the information and the story you are telling are inconsistent and illogical. The WHO is a transnational organisation setup to raise the standard of health care across the world. It works with governments but it has no power whatsoever to tell governments what to do. Your reading of Event 201 and Fauci's warning about the next pandemic are just way off the mark. The WHO has been warning the world that it isn't prepared to deal with a pandemic - and covid has demonstrated that they were right. They weren't planning a pandemic - they were warning governments that they should be planning to deal with a pandemic. You are using evidence that supposedly supports your theory when it does nothing of the sort. You still haven't explained the glaring logical inconsistency in your narrative: Why would the WHO, Bill Gates, Dr Fauci and Imperial College create a pandemic using a virus that you have said on many occasions isn't actually dangerous? If the aim was to introduce restrictions why did they then allow vaccines to come along to cure the virus and allow governments to roll back the very restrictions the virus was supposed to introduce? If the aim all along was to rollout a vaccine that kills people why not roll out a virus that kills people rather than one that doesn't work? And if the aim was to kill people (which in itself is just plain weird) why not just poison the water supply rather than go through such a complex, contorted nonsensical plan? It's not logically inconsistent if the aim is for jabs and ID passes, and economic crash, whilst retaining plausible deniability, which of course poisoning tap water wouldn't (incidentally an idea once considered by elites). And extremely deadly viruses aren't as targeted and controlled as vaccines. You risk killing those useful to you. And it is you who is asking me to theorise. You've got a guy, Fauci, who is saying for definite that there will be a 'surprise' disease, and specifying the time, whilst knowing about and funding research which was moved to Wuhan, the supposed location of an outbreak. And who is responsible for policy advice which copies communist China and is destroyed people's lives. And you don't think there's more to know here, or it worth asking any questions? Or is it off limits and 'unscientific' to ask questions until GMB or the BBC have dealt with it? And you also make assumptions in your questioning.
|
|
|
Post by GoBoks on May 10, 2021 1:13:52 GMT
because "He's" is a truncation and is actually 2 words, are you talking bollocks by saying you can sum it up in 3 words? That’s all I do so yes ! 😁 This site is called the BolloxCake isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by westlandstokie on May 10, 2021 6:27:49 GMT
This was also discussed by Sky News Australia recently in a lot of detail...fascinating and scary at the the same time.
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on May 10, 2021 7:29:20 GMT
This was also discussed by Sky News Australia recently in a lot of detail...fascinating and scary at the the same time. Meanwhile the PRC have now the largest navy in the world. The build up in the last 10 years adding a navy the size of France every year. The idea that the US can exert power in the South China Sea to protect Taiwan or the Philippines is a myth. Remember that the next time someone buys their cheaper products on Amazon. This is where your export ££s go to. www.cnn.com/2021/03/05/china/china-world-biggest-navy-intl-hnk-ml-dst/index.html
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on May 10, 2021 9:07:55 GMT
You're not just presenting information. You are presenting information in a way in to tell a particular story. All I have done is point out that the information does not necessarily support your story - in fact the information and the story you are telling are inconsistent and illogical. The WHO is a transnational organisation setup to raise the standard of health care across the world. It works with governments but it has no power whatsoever to tell governments what to do. Your reading of Event 201 and Fauci's warning about the next pandemic are just way off the mark. The WHO has been warning the world that it isn't prepared to deal with a pandemic - and covid has demonstrated that they were right. They weren't planning a pandemic - they were warning governments that they should be planning to deal with a pandemic. You are using evidence that supposedly supports your theory when it does nothing of the sort. You still haven't explained the glaring logical inconsistency in your narrative: Why would the WHO, Bill Gates, Dr Fauci and Imperial College create a pandemic using a virus that you have said on many occasions isn't actually dangerous? If the aim was to introduce restrictions why did they then allow vaccines to come along to cure the virus and allow governments to roll back the very restrictions the virus was supposed to introduce? If the aim all along was to rollout a vaccine that kills people why not roll out a virus that kills people rather than one that doesn't work? And if the aim was to kill people (which in itself is just plain weird) why not just poison the water supply rather than go through such a complex, contorted nonsensical plan? It's not logically inconsistent if the aim is for jabs and ID passes, and economic crash, whilst retaining plausible deniability, which of course poisoning tap water wouldn't (incidentally an idea once considered by elites). And extremely deadly viruses aren't as targeted and controlled as vaccines. You risk killing those useful to you. And it is you who is asking me to theorise. You've got a guy, Fauci, who is saying for definite that there will be a 'surprise' disease, and specifying the time, whilst knowing about and funding research which was moved to Wuhan, the supposed location of an outbreak. And who is responsible for policy advice which copies communist China and is destroyed people's lives. And you don't think there's more to know here, or it worth asking any questions? Or is it off limits and 'unscientific' to ask questions until GMB or the BBC have dealt with it? And you also make assumptions in your questioning. I am not asking you to theorise - I don't have to because you are constantly putting forward theories with information that you claim backs them up. I'm asking you to explain your theories when they don't make sense and point out that the information you provide doesn't actually support your theories. Actually you appear to have answered my question. In your latest version of your global conspiracy theory it seems that covid and the restrictions were simply a means to an end - which is very handy given that a successful vaccination programme puts pay to the original version. The real aim now is to introduce deadly (targeted) jabs, ids and an economic crash. So: 1 On what basis is are the globalists deciding who is going to die of the vaccine and who isn't? In the UK are they ploughing through a list of 60 million people or is a computer doing the spade work? 2 When I go for my jab is the nurse giving me my injection going to decide whether I'm useful or due the poisonous one or are they dishing out the batches based on a list? 3 What is the purpose of the id and why go to all the trouble of arranging a fake pandemic and a poisonous vaccination programme when they could have just simply introduced legislation? 4 Given that people only get rich in a thriving economy who actually benefits from an economic crash? And if the globalists are already all powerful why do they need to engineer an economic crash? 5 Given that the lockdown restrictions were responsible for a dip in the world economy and the vaccination programme (even if on occasion is poisonous) is still opening economies up how is the economic crash going to be brought about? 6 If Gates and Fauci are the prime movers in the US who are the deep state movers and shakers in the UK? 7 If all of this is true how do we stop it? Or do we just sit there and accept our fate?
|
|
|
Post by Jimmyg on May 10, 2021 10:07:02 GMT
4 Given that people only get rich in a thriving economy who actually benefits from an economic crash? And if the globalists are already all powerful why do they need to engineer an economic crash?
That's not true, major corporations benifit greatly from economic down turn, medium size business fails and they take the market share. You only have to looks at the winners and losers to establish this. Amazon all the major supermarkets have seen their market share sore in recent times. It's not about money it's about control of the market.
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on May 10, 2021 10:47:30 GMT
Well that was scatter gun. Having read it I've no idea whether the article is claiming: 1 The virus was deliberately released 2 Accidentally released 3 Was the result of infection in the wild In terms of a deliberate release there's several things that don't add up: 1 If the Chinese were planning a biological warfare exercise why would they infect their own people? Why not infect a tourist on a flight back home? Or visit a cathedral town like the Russians? 2 The article criticises the Chinese for not acting quickly enough and then covering up the real death total. If they did it deliberately and they were concerned about the number of deaths why didn't they act earlier (or not do it at all) and just keep the deaths down if they didn't want to lose face over the death toll? 3 The claim about the Chinese military investigating biological weapons just seem to be tacked on to stoke up the fear factor and make the article juicier than it is. The fact that China is investigating biological weapons is hardly news. Every country with a significant military presence is doing the same. Porton Down isn't researching into food colouring. It is possible the virus was a naturally occurring virus that was accidentally released from the Wuhan lab - which would explain China's chaotic initial response, their attempts to save face over the number of deaths and their lack of co-operation with the WHO investigation. In terms of how the covid pandemic started it looks like it could be a natural cross over (which the WHO report stated was the most likely cause) or an accidental leak of a natural virus from the Wuhan lab. On that front the WHO and the UN should put pressure on China for a follow up investigation. And if it was an accidental leak there are a hell of a lot of places around the world that need to be worried about what's going on locally rather than worry about what's going on in China. In terms of China developing biological weapons - that's one for international diplomacy. The covid pandemic has very little relevance to that problem.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 10, 2021 11:05:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on May 10, 2021 13:12:14 GMT
Well that was scatter gun. Having read it I've no idea whether the article is claiming: 1 The virus was deliberately released 2 Accidentally released 3 Was the result of infection in the wild In terms of a deliberate release there's several things that don't add up: 1 If the Chinese were planning a biological warfare exercise why would they infect their own people? Why not infect a tourist on a flight back home? Or visit a cathedral town like the Russians? 2 The article criticises the Chinese for not acting quickly enough and then covering up the real death total. If they did it deliberately and they were concerned about the number of deaths why didn't they act earlier (or not do it at all) and just keep the deaths down if they didn't want to lose face over the death toll? 3 The claim about the Chinese military investigating biological weapons just seem to be tacked on to stoke up the fear factor and make the article juicier than it is. The fact that China is investigating biological weapons is hardly news. Every country with a significant military presence is doing the same. Porton Down isn't researching into food colouring.It is possible the virus was a naturally occurring virus that was accidentally released from the Wuhan lab - which would explain China's chaotic initial response, their attempts to save face over the number of deaths and their lack of co-operation with the WHO investigation. In terms of how the covid pandemic started it looks like it could be a natural cross over (which the WHO report stated was the most likely cause) or an accidental leak of a natural virus from the Wuhan lab. On that front the WHO and the UN should put pressure on China for a follow up investigation. And if it was an accidental leak there are a hell of a lot of places around the world that need to be worried about what's going on locally rather than worry about what's going on in China. In terms of China developing biological weapons - that's one for international diplomacy. The covid pandemic has very little relevance to that problem. Cue deep chortle from OS re. the bold, underlined observation. OS.
|
|
|
Post by chigstoke on May 10, 2021 13:24:40 GMT
We’ve finally managed a 0 hospital deaths day in England
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 10, 2021 14:35:46 GMT
We’ve finally managed a 0 hospital deaths day in England Where's that from mate, I couldn't see England's data but the others are online ?
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on May 10, 2021 15:33:46 GMT
We’ve finally managed a 0 hospital deaths day in England Get in there you beauty.
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on May 10, 2021 16:04:58 GMT
We’ve finally managed a 0 hospital deaths day in England Where's that from mate, I couldn't see England's data but the others are online ?
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on May 10, 2021 16:20:55 GMT
These cunts doing the interviews are just unbelievable.
Good to hear Boris being positive against a backdrop of perverse, pathetic negativity from the usual suspects.
|
|
|
Post by chigstoke on May 10, 2021 16:23:10 GMT
We’ve finally managed a 0 hospital deaths day in England Where's that from mate, I couldn't see England's data but the others are online ? Crouchy got there before us mate, but that’s the one, plus the UKCovidStats Twitter
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on May 10, 2021 16:31:59 GMT
These cunts doing the interviews are just unbelievable. Good to hear Boris being positive against a backdrop of perverse, pathetic negativity from the usual suspects. and that’s why he’s so popular because at least he tries to be positive even when things haven’t gone well. People hate negativity when things aren’t going well because it just brings them down further.
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on May 10, 2021 16:36:49 GMT
These cunts doing the interviews are just unbelievable. Good to hear Boris being positive against a backdrop of perverse, pathetic negativity from the usual suspects. and that’s why he’s so popular because at least he tries to be positive even when things haven’t gone well. People hate negativity when things aren’t going well because it just brings them down further. Exactly. My only complaint is that we really shouldn't be mandated anymore to wear masks but at least things are clearly moving in the right direction and thank God he's sacked off the masks for school children.
|
|
|
Post by Davef on May 10, 2021 16:47:41 GMT
These cunts doing the interviews are just unbelievable. Good to hear Boris being positive against a backdrop of perverse, pathetic negativity from the usual suspects. They're not talking bollocks about hugging by any chance are they?
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on May 10, 2021 16:56:18 GMT
These cunts doing the interviews are just unbelievable. Good to hear Boris being positive against a backdrop of perverse, pathetic negativity from the usual suspects. They're not talking bollocks about hugging by any chance are they? Yep. Criticising hugging, encouraging slower unlocking and asking him dumb questions about a Scottish referendum.
|
|
|
Post by werrington on May 10, 2021 17:01:23 GMT
These cunts doing the interviews are just unbelievable. Good to hear Boris being positive against a backdrop of perverse, pathetic negativity from the usual suspects. They're not talking bollocks about hugging by any chance are they? Hugging advice has been fine tuned
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on May 10, 2021 17:30:39 GMT
They're not talking bollocks about hugging by any chance are they? Hugging advice has been fine tuned Absolutely class. Sometimes farce is the best way of showing up the farcical
|
|
|
Post by adri2008 on May 10, 2021 17:35:39 GMT
I see the unions are grumbling that BoJo is getting rid of masks in schools. Apparently its “too much, too soon” to do it safely despite all vulnerable staff getting jabbed months ago and the kids themselves having a tiny chance of getting ill, never mind dying.
|
|
|
Post by musik on May 10, 2021 18:02:56 GMT
Just saw an interesting café tv talk show here with two doctors and a tv host, on national tv.
The prognosis is we will face a similar summer as in 2020 and then "it' will begin again and they talked about the mutations and the need for the third dose this autumn.
They also said we have accelerated now. The age group 55-60 starts this week, one week ahead of the vaccination plan.
They also said we have had less of the seasonal flu, colds, vinter vomit disease etc, so even if Covid-19 hopefully won't come back next winter to the extent we've had this winter, we will have more cases of the seasonal flu and other things.
Our hand washing hygiene and social distancing has helped in not catching colds and the seasonal flu.
Everything won't change back to what it once was, just because we got vaccinated. We will still work from home, wash and desinfect our hands and keep the distance. They didn't mention face mask, so perhaps that's more optional.
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on May 10, 2021 18:08:52 GMT
4 Given that people only get rich in a thriving economy who actually benefits from an economic crash? And if the globalists are already all powerful why do they need to engineer an economic crash? That's not true, major corporations benifit greatly from economic down turn, medium size business fails and they take the market share. You only have to looks at the winners and losers to establish this. Amazon all the major supermarkets have seen their market share sore in recent times. It's not about money it's about control of the market. Some individuals and organisations do well out of an economic downturn but overall there is less money to go round and the overall effect is negative even on the rich. If anyone were to organise a full on global economic crash there's less money to go round - everyone loses. Amazon did well during lockdown because shops were shut - given that most things bought on Amazon are non-essential they would lose out big time in the event of an economic crash and it would be nuts for them to get involved in planning one. To claim governments around the world are in on it makes even less sense - which political party gets back in power when the economy tanks? It just doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 10, 2021 18:25:11 GMT
|
|