|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Aug 25, 2019 7:27:57 GMT
What would be the actual cost of getting rid of Jones and his backroom staff?
Could Stoke really afford it?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2019 7:29:12 GMT
I think, along with the owners lack of plan and foresight, that finances would now have a huge bearing on who we brought in.
There's only so much money in the pot now.
What a mess.
|
|
|
|
Post by basingstokie on Aug 25, 2019 10:22:22 GMT
I suspect we are still effectively paying Hughes, Lambert and Rowett (+ assorted backroomers), so there might be a case for not doing it. TBH, if 4 supposedly decent managers can generate any sort of improvement then it points to the problem not being the manager.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Aug 25, 2019 10:24:03 GMT
I suspect we are still effectively paying Hughes, Lambert and Rowett (+ assorted backroomers), so there might be a case for not doing it. TBH, if 4 supposedly decent managers can generate any sort of improvement then it points to the problem not being the manager. Why would we be paying Hughes and Lambert? |
|
|
|
Post by tpholloway1 on Aug 25, 2019 10:28:59 GMT
What would be the actual cost of getting rid of Jones and his backroom staff? Could Stoke really afford it? I think the question might be can Stoke afford not to? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2019 10:29:32 GMT
Wouldn’t it be more expensive to have to buy a whole new squad in six months because our current manager can’t get anything out of the 3 he has (Premier League old boys, Rowett boys, the 11 players he bought)?
|
|
|
|
Post by 19notbeaten72 on Aug 25, 2019 10:37:00 GMT
I suspect we are still effectively paying Hughes, Lambert and Rowett (+ assorted backroomers), so there might be a case for not doing it. TBH, if 4 supposedly decent managers can generate any sort of improvement then it points to the problem not being the manager. Hughes if i am correct would have ceased to be payed by Stoke when he took the Southampton job. |
|
|
|
Post by basingstokie on Aug 26, 2019 18:20:55 GMT
I suspect we are still effectively paying Hughes, Lambert and Rowett (+ assorted backroomers), so there might be a case for not doing it. TBH, if 4 supposedly decent managers can generate any sort of improvement then it points to the problem not being the manager. Hughes if i am correct would have ceased to be payed by Stoke when he took the Southampton job. Fair point, I guess it depends if we gave him a cheque representing a decent %age of rest of his contract, or just carried on with usual weekly pay packet until he found some other poor desperate chairman |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2019 18:21:55 GMT
I suspect we are still effectively paying Hughes, Lambert and Rowett (+ assorted backroomers), so there might be a case for not doing it. TBH, if 4 supposedly decent managers can generate any sort of improvement then it points to the problem not being the manager. Rowett yes, the other two no..... |
|
