|
|
Post by essexstokey on Sept 25, 2018 20:15:58 GMT
Fifa plans to limit the number of players a club can loan out each season to prevent teams stockpiling talent. Football's governing body had proposed a maximum of six loans per club. link |
|
|
|
Post by teenagefanclub on Sept 25, 2018 20:24:39 GMT
Well done FIFA for once.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2018 20:31:13 GMT
Now this would be good, I'm sure they'd all just use buy-back deals but it's still a step forward.
|
|
|
|
Post by camstoke10 on Sept 25, 2018 21:00:23 GMT
Yeah, well done fifa, let’s stop teams from loaning out loads of players to lower clubs and then instead get them play under 23 football
|
|
|
|
Post by Vadiation_Ribe on Sept 25, 2018 21:45:25 GMT
Hopefully there aren't any loopholes that allow Chelsea to keep loaning out 40 players a season.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 25, 2018 22:17:08 GMT
Yeah, well done fifa, let’s stop teams from loaning out loads of players to lower clubs and then instead get them play under 23 football Alternatively the young players sign for clubs down the league's. |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Sept 25, 2018 22:27:27 GMT
Yeah, well done fifa, let’s stop teams from loaning out loads of players to lower clubs and then instead get them play under 23 football Alternatively the young players sign for clubs down the league's. Or even for clubs lower down the same division! |
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Sept 25, 2018 23:26:17 GMT
Yeah, well done fifa, let’s stop teams from loaning out loads of players to lower clubs and then instead get them play under 23 football Or you stop big clubs hoovering up all the talent just with a view to loan them out (for a fee) or sell on for a profit with no actual intention of ever playing the players. |
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Sept 25, 2018 23:32:38 GMT
Its a good move and long overdue but when you read the small print its a different matter. They are talking about a 2 year consultation period.....consultation with who?...I hope it's not Chelsea!
This will never happen, mark my words
|
|
cbwhu
Academy Starlet
Posts: 155 
|
Post by cbwhu on Sept 26, 2018 7:16:48 GMT
Its a good move and long overdue but when you read the small print its a different matter. They are talking about a 2 year consultation period.....consultation with who?...I hope it's not Chelsea! This will never happen, mark my words there needs to be a timescale to bring it in or many kids currently at bigger clubs who do this would be stranded |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Sept 26, 2018 8:19:26 GMT
Its a good move and long overdue but when you read the small print its a different matter. They are talking about a 2 year consultation period.....consultation with who?...I hope it's not Chelsea! This will never happen, mark my words there needs to be a timescale to bring it in or many kids currently at bigger clubs who do this would be stranded Even if there wasn't, the effect would be that a lot of young players would be immediately sold/released by the clubs which had signed too many players to comply with the rules. No club, even Chelsea, is going to want to be left with far more U23 players than they can ever give a game to. They would have to pay the youngster's wages and would have to watch their value reduce through lack of game time if they didn't move them on. |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Sept 26, 2018 9:05:10 GMT
Its a good move and long overdue but when you read the small print its a different matter. They are talking about a 2 year consultation period.....consultation with who?...I hope it's not Chelsea! This will never happen, mark my words there needs to be a timescale to bring it in or many kids currently at bigger clubs who do this would be stranded Whilst some kids are earning £20k a week they don’t feel stranded. The ones that don’t make it go to zero The ones that get off loaded want to force smaller clubs to pay higher wages for what they are ultimately worth just because they come from a big club Agents are complicit too. The whole system needs upheaving to reward when reward is due. Loan fees should be banned. And wages should be paid by parent club. After all it’s the loan club that is doing the big clubs a favour by giving their players game time. The big clubs will benefit from sales or assets should the player make it. As it is now most of the risk goes on the loan club. For example Leicester get no benefit at all from the development of Harry Kane |
|
|
|
Post by camstoke10 on Sept 26, 2018 11:23:39 GMT
there needs to be a timescale to bring it in or many kids currently at bigger clubs who do this would be stranded Whilst some kids are earning £20k a week they don’t feel stranded. The ones that don’t make it go to zero The ones that get off loaded want to force smaller clubs to pay higher wages for what they are ultimately worth just because they come from a big club Agents are complicit too. The whole system needs upheaving to reward when reward is due. Loan fees should be banned. And wages should be paid by parent club. After all it’s the loan club that is doing the big clubs a favour by giving their players game time. The big clubs will benefit from sales or assets should the player make it. As it is now most of the risk goes on the loan club. For example Leicester get no benefit at all from the development of Harry Kane so what your saying is stoke should pay for Badou, imbula and wimmers wages? |
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Sept 26, 2018 11:27:56 GMT
Whilst some kids are earning £20k a week they don’t feel stranded. The ones that don’t make it go to zero The ones that get off loaded want to force smaller clubs to pay higher wages for what they are ultimately worth just because they come from a big club Agents are complicit too. The whole system needs upheaving to reward when reward is due. Loan fees should be banned. And wages should be paid by parent club. After all it’s the loan club that is doing the big clubs a favour by giving their players game time. The big clubs will benefit from sales or assets should the player make it. As it is now most of the risk goes on the loan club. For example Leicester get no benefit at all from the development of Harry Kane so what your saying is stoke should pay for Badou, imbula and wimmers wages? And Paris should have paid jese, Chelsea zouma etc yep It all works out in the end |
|
