|
|
Post by teabagger on May 27, 2008 12:15:23 GMT
so...which one would you prefer and why?
both cars are a 2002 plate!
cheers!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Zippy Moon Dust on May 27, 2008 12:25:31 GMT
I had a Celica 140 vvti. I liked it but the vision was terrible. Nice gear box but it's a bit of a girlie car too. The 190 Celica is excellent.
I've never tried a Z3 but it's rear wheel drive so probably a bit more fun.
|
|
|
|
Post by Miniman on May 27, 2008 12:33:19 GMT
I would take a punt at the Celica cos the Z3 is a bit too Girly but then again so is the Celica...
go for something different...
|
|
|
|
Post by Spiderman on May 27, 2008 12:41:51 GMT
If you're after something a bit sporty why not try the Mazda RX8, Great value for money and not quite as dated as either the Celica or Z3 (and it is a 4 door 4 seater)
|
|
|
|
Post by teabagger on May 27, 2008 12:45:21 GMT
i know what ya sayin about the mazda rx8 spidey...but i've heard they drink fuel faster then the petrol stations can supply it, which puts me off a fair bit when the petrol prices are soooooooo high!
|
|
|
|
Post by Spiderman on May 27, 2008 12:52:42 GMT
They'll do about 28mpg but they depreciate quite badly too. Also there's they Hyundai Coupe which is I'm led to believe a very good car 35mpg for the 2.0l fully loaded and comes wth manufacturers 5yr warranty. I suppose MPG figures depend on how heavy footed you are.
|
|
|
|
Post by edwardhitler on May 27, 2008 14:58:43 GMT
Spidey, you are either guessing or having a laugh pal.
I own an RX-8 and they do roughly 25mpg on a good run but around town you are looking at 17 mpg tops. Great fun car though.
Strange to be choosing between the Z3 and the Celica, totally different cars.
If you go for the Z3, avoid the 1.9, you could walk faster. Very underpowered. The later 2.2 is much better.
|
|
|
|
Post by chrispk76 on May 27, 2008 16:03:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Mickstoke on May 27, 2008 20:43:17 GMT
both cars are perfect! if you an hairdresser!  |
|
RICCAARRDDOO! JAMAICA SUPERSTAR, STOKE CITY HERO! 
