|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 23, 2017 20:41:55 GMT
USA and North Korea?
How will China react?
They sure won't want a unified pro American Korea on their doorstep.
Is there any possibility of a positive outcome?
Could China 'take over' North Korea?
Is that feasible?
Would that be acceptable for the Americans?
If Korea strikes at the US or if America attacks first where will it all end.
|
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Sept 23, 2017 20:57:07 GMT
The only solution is for the fat twat in charge to die of a sudden mystery illness , and also any similar brothers or cousins to be similarly affected
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 21:26:42 GMT
The only solution is for the fat twat in charge to die of a sudden mystery illness , and also any similar brothers or cousins to be similarly affected Yep, or accidents/ murders. Seems to work for anyone who questions or ruffles the feathers of the "establishment" Martin Luther, princess Dianna, John Lennon etc |
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Sept 23, 2017 21:30:40 GMT
The only solution is for the fat twat in charge to die of a sudden mystery illness , and also any similar brothers or cousins to be similarly affected Does Trump have brothers  |
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Sept 23, 2017 21:30:49 GMT
If it were to escalate then North Korea would be dealt with swiftly, even the Chinese are sick of that fat autistic melt flinging missiles around like they're foam darts from a Nerf gun.
It's the people I feel sorry for, the world wants to get them out of the totalitarian mess they're in, but they've been brainwashed to think otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Sept 23, 2017 21:35:40 GMT
The only solution is for the fat twat in charge to die of a sudden mystery illness , and also any similar brothers or cousins to be similarly affected Yep, or accidents/ murders. Seems to work for anyone who questions or ruffles the feathers of the "establishment" Martin Luther, princess Dianna, John Lennon etc And rod hull |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 23, 2017 21:42:38 GMT
Yep, or accidents/ murders. Seems to work for anyone who questions or ruffles the feathers of the "establishment" Martin Luther, princess Dianna, John Lennon etc And rod hull All this when I'm watching a boxset of Homeland, Saul will not be happy TEST |
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Sept 23, 2017 21:42:42 GMT
The only solution is for the fat twat in charge to die of a sudden mystery illness , and also any similar brothers or cousins to be similarly affected Yep, or accidents/ murders. Seems to work for anyone who questions or ruffles the feathers of the "establishment" Martin Luther, princess Dianna, John Lennon etc Why would a medieval German Protestant be knocked off |
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on Sept 23, 2017 22:08:32 GMT
All this when I'm watching a boxset of Homeland, Saul will not be happy TEST Claire Danes low slung carriage. Lost interest in the neediness. |
|
|
|
Post by turtlefox on Sept 23, 2017 22:21:43 GMT
No.
Diplomacy will come to the rescue because when there is so much at stake, you can't afford to be stupid.
We have too much to lose as a race to blow it all away. Even with allies, if someone became too much of a nuisance, ties would be broken.
Don't let the news disturb your sleep. You will wake up tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 23, 2017 22:24:57 GMT
No. Diplomacy will come to the rescue because when there is so much at stake, you can't afford to be stupid. We have too much to lose as a race to blow it all away. Even with allies, if someone became too much of a nuisance, ties would be broken. Don't let the news disturb your sleep. You will wake up tomorrow. Never underestimate stupidity. Especially with two egotistical morons in charge. |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 23, 2017 22:25:59 GMT
No. Diplomacy will come to the rescue because when there is so much at stake, you can't afford to be stupid. We have too much to lose as a race to blow it all away. Even with allies, if someone became too much of a nuisance, ties would be broken. Don't let the news disturb your sleep. You will wake up tomorrow. Never underestimate stupidity. Especially with two egotistical morons in charge. |
|
|
|
Post by turtlefox on Sept 23, 2017 23:02:07 GMT
No. Diplomacy will come to the rescue because when there is so much at stake, you can't afford to be stupid. We have too much to lose as a race to blow it all away. Even with allies, if someone became too much of a nuisance, ties would be broken. Don't let the news disturb your sleep. You will wake up tomorrow. Never underestimate stupidity. Especially with two egotistical morons in charge. They're just two poster boys for the news. Fair enough, Jong Un is more of a threat because North Korea is a more closed country but they wont do the inevitable. Stupidity didn't get us to where we are and it won't get us to where you think it could do. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2017 6:52:36 GMT
Yep, or accidents/ murders. Seems to work for anyone who questions or ruffles the feathers of the "establishment" Martin Luther, princess Dianna, John Lennon etc Why would a medieval German Protestant be knocked off Shut up |
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Sept 24, 2017 8:10:47 GMT
USA and North Korea? How will China react? They sure won't want a unified pro American Korea on their doorstep. Is there any possibility of a positive outcome? Could China 'take over' North Korea? Is that feasible? Would that be acceptable for the Americans? If Korea strikes at the US or if America attacks first where will it all end. China wont get involved fully. They wont get drawn into a full blown war with NATO over some madman in North Korea, but if the US attacked first I could see them invading to stop the country falling into 'hostile' hands. If North Korea attack first then China wont do anything but protect their border. |
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Sept 24, 2017 10:07:11 GMT
Be a shame if the season bournemouth are going down gets ended by two fat men shooting neucs at eachother
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Sept 24, 2017 10:45:02 GMT
Never underestimate stupidity. Especially with two egotistical morons in charge. They're just two poster boys for the news. Fair enough, Jong Un is more of a threat because North Korea is a more closed country but they wont do the inevitable. Stupidity didn't get us to where we are and it won't get us to where you think it could do. Hope you are right History is littered with stupid acts. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2017 20:33:18 GMT
USA and North Korea? How will China react? They sure won't want a unified pro American Korea on their doorstep. Is there any possibility of a positive outcome? Could China 'take over' North Korea? Is that feasible? Would that be acceptable for the Americans? If Korea strikes at the US or if America attacks first where will it all end. China wont get involved fully. They wont get drawn into a full blown war with NATO over some madman in North Korea, but if the US attacked first I could see them invading to stop the country falling into 'hostile' hands. If North Korea attack first then China wont do anything but protect their border. Well they did last time. I expect China to use the first live fire skirmish to take control of N. Korea and that, although still shit in my opinion is infinitely better than what we have now. They need a reason to act and strangely a reason NO ONE in the world would object to. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2017 20:35:11 GMT
Be a shame if the season bournemouth are going down gets ended by two fat men shooting neucs at eachother Begovic and Adam firing from long range eh  |
|
|
|
Post by turtlefox on Sept 24, 2017 20:51:20 GMT
They're just two poster boys for the news. Fair enough, Jong Un is more of a threat because North Korea is a more closed country but they wont do the inevitable. Stupidity didn't get us to where we are and it won't get us to where you think it could do. Hope you are right History is littered with stupid acts. Maybe, but not so stupid that we destroy ourselves. |
|
|
|
Post by muglump on Sept 24, 2017 21:16:53 GMT
What we read in the news isn't a millionth of the story. As a student of history I know not to underestimate the power of propaganda. Whatever is happening I can guarantee we know nothing about it. As Frank Zappa once said, the American presidency is the entertainment division of the international arms industry
|
|
|
|
Post by woodstein on Sept 24, 2017 21:58:14 GMT
The only solution is for the fat twat in charge to die of a sudden mystery illness , and also any similar brothers or cousins to be similarly affected Yep, or accidents/ murders. Seems to work for anyone who questions or ruffles the feathers of the "establishment" Martin Luther, princess Dianna, John Lennon etc I bet you don't believe the US put a man on the moon or that Hitler didn't die originally. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2017 22:02:40 GMT
Yep, or accidents/ murders. Seems to work for anyone who questions or ruffles the feathers of the "establishment" Martin Luther, princess Dianna, John Lennon etc I bet you don't believe the US put a man on the moon or that Hitler didn't die originally. You'd lose your bet |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2017 22:12:20 GMT
Distance from North Korea to Los Angeles - 9,343 km Distance from North Korea to London - 8,609 km  |
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Sept 24, 2017 22:38:24 GMT
China wont get involved fully. They wont get drawn into a full blown war with NATO over some madman in North Korea, but if the US attacked first I could see them invading to stop the country falling into 'hostile' hands. If North Korea attack first then China wont do anything but protect their border. Well they did last time. I expect China to use the first live fire skirmish to take control of N. Korea and that, although still shit in my opinion is infinitely better than what we have now. They need a reason to act and strangely a reason NO ONE in the world would object to. China will only get involved if the US fires first (Which I highly doubt they will) and then it would be a quick invasion to remove Kim & put an end to the war before it goes too far. China do not want a war on their door step, and they want even less a confrontation with the US, and by extention, NATO, which they cannot win. If North Korea fire first then the US will hit back with a hell of a lot of force (They have no choice not to now, or they'd be seen as weak) China wont do anything but protect their own border at that point 'cos any invasion to try & remove Kim & end the war could lead to a 'mix up' between US & Chinese forces. This would be terrible for China, for all their bluster they're nowhere near ready to try & take on the US & her allies. The ideal scenario for both the US & China is that Fatboy keeps doing stupid things (So he gets the blame) The US can keep threatening a full blown war (So they get to remain 'strong') and eventually China deal with the problem themselves (And get to look both 'strong' & the good guy) Distance from North Korea to Los Angeles - 9,343 km Distance from North Korea to London - 8,609 km Things in the way of the completely unreliable North Korean missiles aimed at Los Angeles - Japan (A country they hate anyway) and the Pacific Ocean. Oh well, nowt to lose. Things in the way of the completely unreliable North Korean missiles aimed at London - China & Russia, the only two friends they have. Better hope those missiles go where they say they're going! |
|
|
|
Post by Boothen on Sept 24, 2017 23:26:30 GMT
Wonder how we'd respond if we had a mad bastard like Kim Jong-un publicly threatening to rain nukes down on the UK?
|
|
|
|
Post by flea79 on Sept 25, 2017 8:41:53 GMT
I can see it all ending with North Korea flattened and a unified Korea as long as the USA withdraw from Korea, this deals with fat boy and keeps the Chinese and Russians happy as a US backed Korea is not joined to them
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2017 11:10:03 GMT
Well they did last time. I expect China to use the first live fire skirmish to take control of N. Korea and that, although still shit in my opinion is infinitely better than what we have now. They need a reason to act and strangely a reason NO ONE in the world would object to. China will only get involved if the US fires first (Which I highly doubt they will) and then it would be a quick invasion to remove Kim & put an end to the war before it goes too far. China do not want a war on their door step, and they want even less a confrontation with the US, and by extention, NATO, which they cannot win. If North Korea fire first then the US will hit back with a hell of a lot of force (They have no choice not to now, or they'd be seen as weak) China wont do anything but protect their own border at that point 'cos any invasion to try & remove Kim & end the war could lead to a 'mix up' between US & Chinese forces. This would be terrible for China, for all their bluster they're nowhere near ready to try & take on the US & her allies. The ideal scenario for both the US & China is that Fatboy keeps doing stupid things (So he gets the blame) The US can keep threatening a full blown war (So they get to remain 'strong') and eventually China deal with the problem themselves (And get to look both 'strong' & the good guy) Distance from North Korea to Los Angeles - 9,343 km Distance from North Korea to London - 8,609 km Things in the way of the completely unreliable North Korean missiles aimed at Los Angeles - Japan (A country they hate anyway) and the Pacific Ocean. Oh well, nowt to lose. Things in the way of the completely unreliable North Korean missiles aimed at London - China & Russia, the only two friends they have. Better hope those missiles go where they say they're going! “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face.” Mike Tyson. |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Sept 25, 2017 11:28:50 GMT
Yep, or accidents/ murders. Seems to work for anyone who questions or ruffles the feathers of the "establishment" Martin Luther, princess Dianna, John Lennon etc Why would a medieval German Protestant be knocked off Pissed on the popes bonfire |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Sept 25, 2017 12:01:59 GMT
All this when I'm watching a boxset of Homeland, Saul will not be happy TEST Claire Danes low slung carriage. Lost interest in the neediness. She's married to some bloke from Newcastle under Lyme. EDIT: Or maybe he went to school in 'Castle ..... or they met in the Golden Lion.... summat like that anyhow. |
|
