|
Post by malteser68 on Aug 12, 2017 14:52:35 GMT
I could bet my last penny that his will be the first head to roll
Very short reign at Inter as well
Clueless
|
|
|
Post by Caerwrangonpotter on Aug 12, 2017 14:53:06 GMT
If it carries on like it is expect Conte to be gone by end of August!
|
|
|
Post by datguy on Aug 12, 2017 14:55:29 GMT
Conte will be the first one to walk.
|
|
|
Post by Jimm on Aug 12, 2017 14:57:29 GMT
45 minutes in to the Premier league..............
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Aug 12, 2017 14:58:30 GMT
45 minutes in to the Premier league.............. Didn't you know? how the table looks after round 1 is exactly what it will look like after round 38.
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Aug 12, 2017 15:00:43 GMT
I mentioned this a few weeks ago.... he'll be gone by Christmas.
|
|
|
Post by redstriper on Aug 12, 2017 15:02:02 GMT
I could bet my last penny that his will be the first head to roll Very short reign at Inter as well Clueless go on then, if you're already congratulating yourself after 45 mins of the season why not put your money where your mouth is ?
|
|
|
Post by malteser68 on Aug 12, 2017 15:24:26 GMT
I could bet my last penny that his will be the first head to roll Very short reign at Inter as well Clueless go on then, if you're already congratulating yourself after 45 mins of the season why not put your money where your mouth is ? Maybe i will
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Aug 28, 2017 12:17:17 GMT
He's managed to get to 64 days so far.
He lasted 85 at Inter Milan.
|
|
|
Post by LDE76 on Aug 28, 2017 12:19:11 GMT
He's managed to get to 64 days so far. He lasted 85 at Inter Milan. I had a read of the Palace forum yesterday. Loads of them want him out already.
|
|
|
Post by ashley luiz on Aug 28, 2017 12:19:19 GMT
Hughes in 👍
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Aug 28, 2017 12:20:14 GMT
Happy we stuck with Hughes, the devil you know and all that.
My Palace supporting mate thinks De Boer is useless and a goner! (Already)
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Aug 28, 2017 12:21:34 GMT
Ashley Out!
|
|
|
Post by milky on Aug 28, 2017 12:21:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pulismaskreplica on Aug 28, 2017 12:23:57 GMT
You'd think clubs would do their homework on a new Manager first before appointing a guy on x amount per week for x amount of years. At least with a player you can sell them on for something even if it's at a loss. If Palace get rid of him then they will have to pay out his contract in full for 60 odd days of work - mental
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Aug 28, 2017 12:25:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by alster on Aug 28, 2017 12:31:12 GMT
You'd think clubs would do their homework on a new Manager first before appointing a guy on x amount per week for x amount of years. At least with a player you can sell them on for something even if it's at a loss. If Palace get rid of him then they will have to pay out his contract in full for 60 odd days of work - mental The stupidity of it is they employ a manager who's views/methods/gameplans are the opposite of the bloke you are replacing then get cold feet 3 games into a predictable bumpy ride.
|
|
|
Post by Hannibal on Aug 28, 2017 12:33:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by MilanStokie on Aug 28, 2017 12:35:02 GMT
If I had some time on my hands I would find the thread and posts where quite a few were blasting Coates over the summer for not sacking Hughes and getting De Boer in.
Hilarious.
|
|
|
Post by pulismaskreplica on Aug 28, 2017 12:42:12 GMT
You'd think clubs would do their homework on a new Manager first before appointing a guy on x amount per week for x amount of years. At least with a player you can sell them on for something even if it's at a loss. If Palace get rid of him then they will have to pay out his contract in full for 60 odd days of work - mental The stupidity of it is they employ a manager who's views/methods/gameplans are the opposite of the bloke you are replacing then get cold feet 3 games into a predictable bumpy ride. Exactly. Either appoint an up and at em manager to carry on the Allardyce work with players tailored to that system or back your own judgment as a board and support a completely different philosophy with funds, support and time
|
|
|
Post by duckling on Aug 28, 2017 13:17:00 GMT
If Palace get rid of him then they will have to pay out his contract in full for 60 odd days of work - mental Do they? I thought there are clauses saying how much they get if/when they are sacked. I'm pretty sure they don't get the entire value of the contract.
|
|
|
Post by nonameface on Aug 28, 2017 13:20:52 GMT
If Palace get rid of him then they will have to pay out his contract in full for 60 odd days of work - mental Do they? I thought there are clauses saying how much they get if/when they are sacked. I'm pretty sure they don't get the entire value of the contract. Really does depend upon the contract but if there isn't a clause in there then a quick payoff in full is a possibility.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 13:22:34 GMT
Very shexy man dontchakno; victim of a very unfortunate schmelting accident too!
|
|
|
Post by duckling on Aug 28, 2017 13:26:47 GMT
The stupidity of it is they employ a manager who's views/methods/gameplans are the opposite of the bloke you are replacing then get cold feet 3 games into a predictable bumpy ride. Exactly. Either appoint an up and at em manager to carry on the Allardyce work with players tailored to that system or back your own judgment as a board and support a completely different philosophy with funds, support and time Reportedly in the job description/application circulated to the football community, the Palace board indicated that strong priority would be given to managers with a history of a passing football style. If so, the Palace board are partly to blame for the current struggles. You can't transform Pulis and Allardyce recruits overnight. In fact I'm not sure you can ever transform them. If I were de Boer, I'd play hoofball until at least the January transfer window at which point they can recruit some players with more finesse. I get the feeling that the Palace board are getting a bit full of themselves and a bit delusional about the quality of players they have.
|
|
|
Post by pulismaskreplica on Aug 28, 2017 13:27:42 GMT
If Palace get rid of him then they will have to pay out his contract in full for 60 odd days of work - mental Do they? I thought there are clauses saying how much they get if/when they are sacked. I'm pretty sure they don't get the entire value of the contract. My understanding is that this is always the case unless the manager is in breach of contract. The length of contract and value of it has to be paid in full by the club. How come you believe differently?
|
|
|
Post by LDE76 on Aug 28, 2017 13:28:09 GMT
Exactly. Either appoint an up and at em manager to carry on the Allardyce work with players tailored to that system or back your own judgment as a board and support a completely different philosophy with funds, support and time Reportedly in the job description/application circulated to the football community, the Palace board indicated that strong priority would be given to managers with a history of a passing football style. If so, the Palace board are partly to blame for the current struggles. You can't transform Pulis and Allardyce recruits overnight. In fact I'm not sure you can ever transform them. If I were de Boer, I'd play hoofball until at least the January transfer window at which point they can recruit some players with more finesse. I get the feeling that the Palace board are getting a bit full of themselves and a bit delusional about the quality of players they have. Steve Parish is copping a lot of stick on the Palace forum right now.
|
|
|
Post by duckling on Aug 28, 2017 13:36:15 GMT
Do they? I thought there are clauses saying how much they get if/when they are sacked. I'm pretty sure they don't get the entire value of the contract. My understanding is that this is always the case unless the manager is in breach of contract. The length of contract and value of it has to be paid in full by the club. How come you believe differently? I think I read that Louis van Gaal got X as a severance, and it was less than the full value of his contract. In the United States, coaches generally have clauses stating how much they will get if they are sacked early. In one case of a college coach, they waited until New Year's Day to sack him because the severance was less if he was sacked in the new calendar year. American teams tend to sack less frequently than English football teams by the way.
|
|
|
Post by duckling on Aug 28, 2017 13:40:30 GMT
Do they? I thought there are clauses saying how much they get if/when they are sacked. I'm pretty sure they don't get the entire value of the contract. My understanding is that this is always the case unless the manager is in breach of contract. The length of contract and value of it has to be paid in full by the club. How come you believe differently? If this is the case, I imagine that the contracts are written so that a large chunk of the salary is in bonuses which they obviously can't get if they are sacked. My guess is that payoff terms vary by club.
|
|
|
Post by cheekymatt71 on Aug 28, 2017 13:46:54 GMT
I was one calling for de Boer after last season.
To be fair sacking managers after 3 games is a bit extreme. We were stuck at the bottom after 6 games the last two seasons.
He does look out of his depth at the moment
|
|
|
Post by pulismaskreplica on Aug 28, 2017 13:47:24 GMT
My understanding is that this is always the case unless the manager is in breach of contract. The length of contract and value of it has to be paid in full by the club. How come you believe differently? If this is the case, I imagine that the contracts are written so that a large chunk of the salary is in bonuses which they obviously can't get if they are sacked. My guess is that payoff terms vary by club. Fair points, you could be right 👍
|
|