|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 27, 2017 9:31:54 GMT
But you consider McDonut to be vastly superior to all the Conservative MP's don't you? The vast majority yes. Certainly the pathetic leader who nallsed up the election through well just being really really shit. Go on then, bit of fun, name you top 3 Tory MP's. For me, Frank Field, John Mann and Kate Hoey with a respectful mention to ex-MP Gisela Stuart. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2017 9:44:44 GMT
.... If Leicester can win the league title ...then it's fair and proper to assume that the City of Leicester has an automatic right to become Muslim which it has backed by its local population . ... Wonderful, just wonderful. A perfect example of the mumf oeuvre. The quoted passage is a particularly good example of the illogical rhetoric he employs, which was the highlight in a longer passage of gibberish, much of which could also be quoted to highlight his work in this period. The most-recent incarnation (2017 - ?) of the 'mumf' character employed more restraint than previous versions; He initially did not rise to previously successful attempts to bait using the term 'dog egg', nor has he mentioned 'Hilda'. This has lead to speculation in the academic community to ask 'What is mumf?' 1. Is it an art collective of post-modern anarchists, most recently seen elsewhere in recent history using the facade of working class origins to force us to ask ourselves 'What is class?' by satirising some of the more extreme attitudes to the working class held by those purporting to be superior to them? Is it a hatchet job by one of the recent more radical movements, designed to display a caricature of the sort of irrational hatred and rage associated with being an ill-educated working man in post-austerity Britain? Older accounts suggest that 'mumf' is none of the above, but these accounts lack nuance. They were underdeveloped in suggested that 'mumf' was a single actor rather than a collective, which is the current consensus. These accounts are easily dismissed when considering that older incarnations of 'mumf' were not credible, particularly in suggesting it worked around 80 hours a week in kennels while managing to post long, meandering diatribes which also suggested frequent and intense use of both alcohol and/or psychedelics. One individual alone would be unable to put themselves in such an emotionally and mentally taxing headspace irrespective of their creative brilliance, and so it is generally concluded that the posts associated with 'mumf' must come from multiple sources. Regardless of the contemporary debates surrounding its origins, it is generally accepted that periods in which the mumf collective is active coincide with enormous potential for creativity in other, often conflicting, artists. It is accepted that the sense of nihilism inherent in their output contributes greatly to both ennobling supporters of the art (including those who misunderstand it), and revitalising the creative energies of those that oppose it. 1. NB. Not 'who' |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 27, 2017 9:46:09 GMT
The vast majority yes. Certainly the pathetic leader who nallsed up the election through well just being really really shit. Go on then, bit of fun, name you top 3 Tory MP's. For me, Frank Field, John Mann and Kate Hoey with a respectful mention to ex-MP Gisela Stuart. David Davis, a bit right wing for my tastes but seems to have a lot of integrity and always admired his stance on civil liberties. Kenneth Clarke, a giant amongst the current crop of Tory pygmies really am struggling for a third I'll go for Pritti Patel because she gives me the horn! (Jeremy and John will be ashamed of me!)  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2017 9:48:00 GMT
Go on then, bit of fun, name you top 3 Tory MP's. For me, Frank Field, John Mann and Kate Hoey with a respectful mention to ex-MP Gisela Stuart. David Davis, a bit right wing for my tastes but seems to have a lot of integrity and always admired his stance on civil liberties. Kenneth Clarke, a giant amongst the current crop of Tory pygmies really am struggling for a third I'll go for Pritti Patel because she gives me the horn! (Jeremy and John will be ashamed of me!) I'd really like to have it off with Patel, agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by Waggy on Jun 27, 2017 9:52:21 GMT
i cant believe that Antifa- side with muslim faith and they know nothing of what the religion stands for, they need to read up on it like i have. What Tommy Robinson says is actually factual but i think hes the wrong man to put it across with his past.
The governments of France, Sweden, Germany, Belgium, Norway, Denmark and Britain have let their people down badly.
When these countries let people in with people with different beliefs on how they should live and not set any ground rules on intergration and let them lives their lives in areas all together basically living like the non Native way then there was always going to be problems.
There should have been a cap on immigration, all immigration, non of this going over another country to marry someone they've never met at the age of 14 ( not the law of out land again) and over all control ( which governments have lost)
How the hell have we got a law on FGM yet not one person has been prosecuted is astounding and it is happening in this country.
Governments of western Europe have failed us
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jun 27, 2017 10:03:40 GMT
But you consider McDonut to be vastly superior to all the Conservative MP's don't you? The vast majority yes. Certainly the pathetic leader who nallsed up the election through well just being really really shit. May tried her best to lose the election, I agree she is a pathetic leader a half decent opposition Labour party would have kicked her arse, the fact is they didn't and thankfully we are not having to endure a Marxist government controlled by a Mao admiring terrorist sympathiser. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 27, 2017 10:10:26 GMT
The vast majority yes. Certainly the pathetic leader who nallsed up the election through well just being really really shit. May tried her best to lose the election, I agree she is a pathetic leader a half decent opposition Labour party would have kicked her arse, the fact is they didn't and thankfully we are not having to endure a Marxist government controlled by a Mao admiring terrorist sympathiser. We will have a Labour Government soon enough Carpy. Just a matter of time before this whole thing collapses and the electorate won't forgive the Tory Party for two years of the most unstable Government in generations, purely designed by Tories to save the Tory Party from implosion. |
|
|
|
Post by Waggy on Jun 27, 2017 10:10:55 GMT
The vast majority yes. Certainly the pathetic leader who nallsed up the election through well just being really really shit. May tried her best to lose the election, I agree she is a pathetic leader a half decent opposition Labour party would have kicked her arse, the fact is they didn't and thankfully we are not having to endure a Marxist government controlled by a Mao admiring terrorist sympathiser. Hear hear |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 27, 2017 10:27:33 GMT
I love this idea that 40% of the population are Marxist sympathisers. The Tories still scaring people even when they've had their trousers pulled down. |
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jun 27, 2017 10:42:30 GMT
.... If Leicester can win the league title ...then it's fair and proper to assume that the City of Leicester has an automatic right to become Muslim which it has backed by its local population . ... Wonderful, just wonderful. A perfect example of the mumf oeuvre. The quoted passage is a particularly good example of the illogical rhetoric he employs, which was the highlight in a longer passage of gibberish, much of which could also be quoted to highlight his work in this period. The most-recent incarnation (2017 - ?) of the 'mumf' character employed more restraint than previous versions; He initially did not rise to previously successful attempts to bait using the term 'dog egg', nor has he mentioned 'Hilda'. This has lead to speculation in the academic community to ask 'What is mumf?' 1. Is it an art collective of post-modern anarchists, most recently seen elsewhere in recent history using the facade of working class origins to force us to ask ourselves 'What is class?' by satirising some of the more extreme attitudes to the working class held by those purporting to be superior to them? Is it a hatchet job by one of the recent more radical movements, designed to display a caricature of the sort of irrational hatred and rage associated with being an ill-educated working man in post-austerity Britain? Older accounts suggest that 'mumf' is none of the above, but these accounts lack nuance. They were underdeveloped in suggested that 'mumf' was a single actor rather than a collective, which is the current consensus. These accounts are easily dismissed when considering that older incarnations of 'mumf' were not credible, particularly in suggesting it worked around 80 hours a week in kennels while managing to post long, meandering diatribes which also suggested frequent and intense use of both alcohol and/or psychedelics. One individual alone would be unable to put themselves in such an emotionally and mentally taxing headspace irrespective of their creative brilliance, and so it is generally concluded that the posts associated with 'mumf' must come from multiple sources. Regardless of the contemporary debates surrounding its origins, it is generally accepted that periods in which the mumf collective is active coincide with enormous potential for creativity in other, often conflicting, artists. It is accepted that the sense of nihilism inherent in their output contributes greatly to both ennobling supporters of the art (including those who misunderstand it), and revitalising the creative energies of those that oppose it. 1. NB. Not 'who'Shit the bath, fella. The ball is out of the park and through some poor cunt's window! You're quite right about the big lad revitalising creative energies - this is a world above the usual drivel you inflict on us all  Joking aside mate, a really top post - thanks for sharing. Some interesting points that I'm sure we can all mull over And one primary point that I'm sure we can all agree on - it's good to have mumf back. No coincidence that this place is a whole lot more fun when he's around. It comes from the heart with mumf. Not copy/pasted from some online dribbler like all too many on here  |
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 27, 2017 12:06:45 GMT
Go on then, bit of fun, name you top 3 Tory MP's. For me, Frank Field, John Mann and Kate Hoey with a respectful mention to ex-MP Gisela Stuart. David Davis, a bit right wing for my tastes but seems to have a lot of integrity and always admired his stance on civil liberties. Kenneth Clarke, a giant amongst the current crop of Tory pygmies really am struggling for a third I'll go for Pritti Patel because she gives me the horn! (Jeremy and John will be ashamed of me!) Crikey, owd Clarkey is usually drunker than Jean Claude. Johnny Mercer's a good one to offer up if you're ever cornered by the Bullingdon Bover Boys mate. Agree about Patel. She's a bit of a wide load in the conventional sense but attractive and very attracting. |
|
