|
Post by rat on Jun 29, 2017 6:33:10 GMT
Mmmm.....Patriots ditch their party loyalty and vote for whats best for the country ....Does that include those who for the last 50 years have been CND supporters and would like to abolish our nuclear weapons program ? Are they people who would not press the red button and has said so on many occasions ? People who suddenly take to the stage at Glastonbury to preach their gospel .... Good night ...sleep well ...and if you feel a warm glow as you get into bed , don't panic , it might the wife and not Russia that's providing you with a hot flush . I love you all ...Labour 4 Tories 4 **************s 444 Food for thought there indeed, fella - thanks A couple of words to the wise though. Firstly, if Russia did nuke the UK (God forbid ) then by the time ordinary folk felt a warm glow, our nuclear deterrent would be somewhat useless - so your point is null I'm afraid Secondly, it's concerning that you've chosen to bring up the old ************** accusations again. You were off to a great start with this latest incarnation - don't let's get dragged back into all that old toxic nonsense again You know what happens when you get into the ************** guff. It's a one-way street to the old self-red-card routine. The ragequit. Let's not go there again, eh, mate? Now crack on Only this bloke ************** wins when it gets to the usual fever pitch of round the clock blanket accusations by the local hebrews. It's excruciatingly boring as well, kills any form of discussion. Flashmumf (Harryburrows) is obsessed with ************** as is Mary, Nortwhich, Crapslinger...
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jun 29, 2017 6:49:58 GMT
Trying to gain friends by playing multi rolls on both sides of the political spectrum Very very sad indeed I am unanimous Mary You're not surely suggesting that our good friend flashdance is ************** too now are you, fella?! What on earth makes you think that?!
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jun 29, 2017 6:59:52 GMT
Food for thought there indeed, fella - thanks A couple of words to the wise though. Firstly, if Russia did nuke the UK (God forbid ) then by the time ordinary folk felt a warm glow, our nuclear deterrent would be somewhat useless - so your point is null I'm afraid Secondly, it's concerning that you've chosen to bring up the old ************** accusations again. You were off to a great start with this latest incarnation - don't let's get dragged back into all that old toxic nonsense again You know what happens when you get into the ************** guff. It's a one-way street to the old self-red-card routine. The ragequit. Let's not go there again, eh, mate? Now crack on Only this bloke ************** wins when it gets to the usual fever pitch of round the clock blanket accusations by the local hebrews. It's excruciatingly boring as well, kills any form of discussion. Flashmumf (Harryburrows) is obsessed with ************** as is Mary, Nortwhich, Crapslinger... Yep it does seem that way. Ironic really that the obsession with ************** - as opposed to the actual ************** himself - should be the thing that keeps bringing the house of cards crashing down. Wherever he may be, I imagine ************** is chuckling about all the knicker-wetting that goes on in his absence Fraise even seems to be claiming that mumf is ************** now - can it be true?! Now that would be a plot twist
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 29, 2017 7:20:27 GMT
The next person who mentions ************** Is banned.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2017 7:24:46 GMT
The next person who mentions ************** Is banned. Is "the little bald guy" ok?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2017 7:25:32 GMT
The next person who mentions ************** Is banned. To be honest the only one using his name the most is him
|
|
|
Post by rat on Jun 29, 2017 7:26:39 GMT
The next person who mentions ************** Is banned. About time.
|
|
|
Post by rat on Jun 29, 2017 7:34:14 GMT
The next person who mentions ************** Is banned. Is "the little bald guy" ok? Why the obsession Mary? What's it all about?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jun 29, 2017 7:38:43 GMT
Is "the little bald guy" ok? Why the obsession Mary? What's it all about? Am I speaking in Arabic?
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 29, 2017 7:45:39 GMT
I've read some garbage from you but this takes the biscuit, Labour left a deficit of £144 billion for the tories, thats spending £144 billion a YEAR more than they take in tax each YEAR, this wasn't for one off items this is the normal day to day running costs, thats why they left the no money left note. And the crisis was made worse by Labour bailing out Northern Rock because it was located in a Labour heartland. The impact of the financial crisis was worsened because of Thatcher deregulating banks. The tories heavily criticised Balir's government for regulating them and so had the tories been in charge instead of labour the financial crisis would have hit us harder. Plus the tories have pressed the self destruct button on our economy because of brexit. The tories are economically illiterate Actually the impact of the financial crisis was worsened by Labour not keeping an eye on what the banks were doing, too busy knighting Fred The Shred and his ilk. The Tories argued for more efficient regulation. More jobs, lower unemployment they have really destroyed the economy, the people choose brexit and in case you missed it Labour also back it although they keep doing the hokey cokey on it.
|
|
|
Post by rat on Jun 29, 2017 7:51:02 GMT
The impact of the financial crisis was worsened because of Thatcher deregulating banks. The tories heavily criticised Balir's government for regulating them and so had the tories been in charge instead of labour the financial crisis would have hit us harder. Plus the tories have pressed the self destruct button on our economy because of brexit. The tories are economically illiterate Actually the impact of the financial crisis was worsened by Labour not keeping an eye on what the banks were doing, too busy knighting Fred The Shred and his ilk. The Tories argued for more efficient regulation. More jobs, lower unemployment they have really destroyed the economy, the people choose brexit and in case you missed it Labour also back it although they keep doing the hokey cokey on it. The banks were deregulated in the eighties by none other than Margaret Thatcher. The mess we are in is all down to the bloody Tories and their pals in the banks who were subsequently bailed out by nurses, policeman, factory workers and the rest of us mugs.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Jun 29, 2017 9:43:58 GMT
Actually the impact of the financial crisis was worsened by Labour not keeping an eye on what the banks were doing, too busy knighting Fred The Shred and his ilk. The Tories argued for more efficient regulation. More jobs, lower unemployment they have really destroyed the economy, the people choose brexit and in case you missed it Labour also back it although they keep doing the hokey cokey on it. The banks were deregulated in the eighties by none other than Margaret Thatcher. The mess we are in is all down to the bloody Tories and their pals in the banks who were subsequently bailed out by nurses, policeman, factory workers and the rest of us mugs. No, the Bank of England regulates the bank and they are still effectively a government department, if Labour had done their job managing the banks..........
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 29, 2017 9:50:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2017 10:40:06 GMT
I do think Parkhall has a point . I do need to retake that one O-level I failed ....I think it was French but the teacher was always talking in a language I couldn't understand ... I actually feel guilty and ashamed ....if wasn't for the friendliness of the Labour supporters on here I'd be a broken man . I might enrol at Burslem technical college as a mature student with hygiene issues . I've been told that you get your own private room with extra support ....and I could do with some because me piles are playing havoc tonight . The current phase of this incarnation truly is fascinating and wonderous to observe. We are observing the slow drawing back of a curtain, yet the first thing we witness as the curtain is slowly tugged is a sturdy, but well-worn olive green wellington boot. We know what is behind the curtain from the first peek, but we are still enjoying the slow reveal in the hope that something new is revealed to challenge current thinking on the subject(s). A giant belt-buckle, or a cowboy shirt. A stain or a giant scar on the subject's(') chest 1. We great each new morsel of information with equal glee, whether life-affirming or unnerving. But what does the current burst of creativity tell us? The character is known to be prolific in bursts, but the current burst is erratic. Posts vary from pithy, withering put downs to long meandering diatribes that push the very boundaries of language itself. The above source is one of many that may be examined in the last 24 hours, but this particular one relates to the previous point. We are being told to consider that which we do not (or did not) understand, and to go back to it with fresh eyes having matured and with the support of our peers. Interestingly, French is chosen to illustrate this point, perhaps hinting towards the work of Derrida and in doing so seeking to criticise those who attempt to deconstruct his work. Further observation of their output is essential in order to understand this point further. 'mumf' has been known to lash out wildly at his critics, though these outbursts are erratic and not always sustained. One hopes that the author(s) are not sustained in their malaise towards their critics, who endeavour to both preserve the output for future generations, while also helping to understand the artist while they are creating output. As has been seen in past incarnations, the level of intensity is hard to sustain, with the last in-plain-sight version being active for just two months early in 2016. One thing is certain, as the French might say (if they could understand him): mumf, Je t'aime.1. Those new to the subject may only be familiar with the surface, and are often turned off by what is perceived to be body horror with frequent reference to bodily functions and piles
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jun 29, 2017 13:02:47 GMT
I can see that this article is both great and essential reading from your point of view, todge. That's because it doesn't challenge your existing perceptions in any way We've all seen how you respond to opinions that challenge your perceptions - with anger, abuse and meltdowns. You've never once - to my knowledge - retracted any comment or admitted to even the tiniest facet of ignorance on any topic anywhere on this board. This insecure mindset requires a constant flow of sympathetic Twitter feeds and articles from online "experts". So much the better if, like this one, they allow you the luxury of thinking that 'even Labour supporters agree with me so I don't ever need to reevaluate anything in any way'. So to the article itself. It's reasonably well written in terms of its prose but adds nothing whatsoever to the debate beyond a "Greatest Hits" package of the usual old criticisms of Corbyn. Well, okay, there's the now-standard mea culpa from those on the right of the left (as it were). "I'm dead sorry for insulting so many people's intelligence for two years straight but, on a serious note, pls remember I am still right lol" etc. Beyond that it's basic reinforcement of a tried, tested, tired and failed smear campaign. The same one nurtured so tenderly by the mainstream media and lapped up by an ever-decreasing number of voters. The smear campaign is either righteous or unfair depending on your political viewpoint, but it's hardly new; in fact it's all we've been fed by the MSM for two years. So for most people, the article is neither great nor essential. It's just more of the same. A cursory glance at an Owen Smith speech from last summer would cover all this ground and more. (Incidentally, boy, has he changed his tune now ) But if you're of a very right-wing persuasion and your ego needs a massage, then go ahead. Fill yer boots.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 29, 2017 13:09:59 GMT
I can see that this article is both great and essential reading from your point of view, todge. That's because it doesn't challenge your existing perceptions in any way We've all seen how you respond to opinions that challenge your perceptions - with anger, abuse and meltdowns. You've never once - to my knowledge - retracted any comment or admitted to even the tiniest facet of ignorance on any topic anywhere on this board. This insecure mindset requires a constant flow of sympathetic Twitter feeds and articles from online "experts". So much the better if, like this one, they allow you the luxury of thinking that 'even Labour supporters agree with me so I don't ever need to reevaluate anything in any way'. So to the article itself. It's reasonably well written in terms of its prose but adds nothing whatsoever to the debate beyond a "Greatest Hits" package of the usual old criticisms of Corbyn. Well, okay, there's the now-standard mea culpa from those on the right of the left (as it were). "I'm dead sorry for insulting so many people's intelligence for two years straight but, on a serious note, pls remember I am still right lol" etc. Beyond that it's basic reinforcement of a tried, tested, tired and failed smear campaign. The same one nurtured so tenderly by the mainstream media and lapped up by an ever-decreasing number of voters. The smear campaign is either righteous or unfair depending on your political viewpoint, but it's hardly new; in fact it's all we've been fed by the MSM for two years. So for most people, the article is neither great nor essential. It's just more of the same. A cursory glance at an Owen Smith speech from last summer would cover all this ground and more. (Incidentally, boy, has he changed his tune now ) But if you're of a very right-wing persuasion and your ego needs a massage, then go ahead. Fill yer boots. "We've all seen" 😂 MM, Deano, Rat, Essex, Lesbian Jane 😂😂😂 You really do want your tummy tickled today don't you..... yes you do.....yes you do.... princess.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 29, 2017 13:21:49 GMT
Today's coalition of chaos circus is playing with the fears of Northern Ireland's women on abortion. Looks like the Government have done the decent thing, does that mean another £1 Billion for Orange Creationists?
#strongandstable
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 29, 2017 13:28:25 GMT
"Kinder, gentler politics"
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Jun 29, 2017 13:34:46 GMT
Today's coalition of chaos circus is playing with the fears of Northern Ireland's women on abortion. Looks like the Government have done the decent thing, does that mean another £1 Billion for Orange Creationists? #strongandstable You've been tangoed
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Jun 29, 2017 13:51:14 GMT
I can see that this article is both great and essential reading from your point of view, todge. That's because it doesn't challenge your existing perceptions in any way We've all seen how you respond to opinions that challenge your perceptions - with anger, abuse and meltdowns. You've never once - to my knowledge - retracted any comment or admitted to even the tiniest facet of ignorance on any topic anywhere on this board. This insecure mindset requires a constant flow of sympathetic Twitter feeds and articles from online "experts". So much the better if, like this one, they allow you the luxury of thinking that 'even Labour supporters agree with me so I don't ever need to reevaluate anything in any way'. So to the article itself. It's reasonably well written in terms of its prose but adds nothing whatsoever to the debate beyond a "Greatest Hits" package of the usual old criticisms of Corbyn. Well, okay, there's the now-standard mea culpa from those on the right of the left (as it were). "I'm dead sorry for insulting so many people's intelligence for two years straight but, on a serious note, pls remember I am still right lol" etc. Beyond that it's basic reinforcement of a tried, tested, tired and failed smear campaign. The same one nurtured so tenderly by the mainstream media and lapped up by an ever-decreasing number of voters. The smear campaign is either righteous or unfair depending on your political viewpoint, but it's hardly new; in fact it's all we've been fed by the MSM for two years. So for most people, the article is neither great nor essential. It's just more of the same. A cursory glance at an Owen Smith speech from last summer would cover all this ground and more. (Incidentally, boy, has he changed his tune now ) But if you're of a very right-wing persuasion and your ego needs a massage, then go ahead. Fill yer boots. "We've all seen" 😂 MM, Deano, Rat, Essex, Lesbian Jane 😂😂😂 You really do want your tummy tickled today don't you..... yes you do.....yes you do.... princess. You've just proved everything I wanted proving. I thought you would. I wasn't after anything else ta
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Jun 29, 2017 14:01:47 GMT
"Kinder, gentler politics" Roger I hope you are not trying to align this far left political organisation to any mainstream party as they were expelled years ago them and militant !!
|
|
|
Post by oggyoggy on Jun 29, 2017 14:16:58 GMT
The impact of the financial crisis was worsened because of Thatcher deregulating banks. The tories heavily criticised Balir's government for regulating them and so had the tories been in charge instead of labour the financial crisis would have hit us harder. Plus the tories have pressed the self destruct button on our economy because of brexit. The tories are economically illiterate Actually the impact of the financial crisis was worsened by Labour not keeping an eye on what the banks were doing, too busy knighting Fred The Shred and his ilk. The Tories argued for more efficient regulation. More jobs, lower unemployment they have really destroyed the economy, the people choose brexit and in case you missed it Labour also back it although they keep doing the hokey cokey on it. More efficient regulation is a fancy way of saying less regulation. It is simply a fact that the tories were critical of blair regulating banks (he didn't do it nearly enough) but the tories wanted the banks to be able to tale more risks and have less regulation controlling their actions. Lots of jobs now are insecure or zero hours. And their is no question that since the referendum our economy has steadily gone down hill. Labour are bad, the tories are worse. That's why I didn't vote for either.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 29, 2017 14:23:57 GMT
"Kinder, gentler politics" Roger I hope you are not trying to align this far left political organisation to any mainstream party as they were expelled years ago them and militant !! If you don't agree with demonising the poor on the basis of bedrooms, terrifying the elderly on the basis of their care and meagre incomes or aren't in favour of tipping the sick out of their wheelchairs into minimum wage jobs, you're a Trot in Rog's eyes!
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Jun 29, 2017 14:35:05 GMT
Roger I hope you are not trying to align this far left political organisation to any mainstream party as they were expelled years ago them and militant !! If you don't agree with demonising the poor on the basis of bedrooms, terrifying the elderly on the basis of their care and meagre incomes or aren't in favour of tipping the sick out of their wheelchairs into minimum wage jobs, you're a Trot in Rog's eyes! Had dealings with swp years ago they are opportunists who believe in anarchy and want the state to fall but wont fight in an election as they know they will be slaughtered that why I'm very careful if someone asks me to sign a petition as its a way they get addresses etc to try and recruit. If you go to any demo they hand out posters promoting there political left wing philosophies people then don't see that they are being used by them to promote the swp brand they just see posters with logo's
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 29, 2017 15:06:18 GMT
Roger I hope you are not trying to align this far left political organisation to any mainstream party as they were expelled years ago them and militant !! If you don't agree with demonising the poor on the basis of bedrooms, terrifying the elderly on the basis of their care and meagre incomes or aren't in favour of tipping the sick out of their wheelchairs into minimum wage jobs, you're a Trot in Rog's eyes! Here you go comrades..... Attachment DeletedNow at least have the bollocks to call your Great Leader a spade? Somehow, I think not. You Lefties are always looking for someone else to blame. Always looking for someone else to pay for shit. Always protesting about something else apart from your own inadequacies. You could always show your collective spirit and buy your trendy Antifa T for 25 EURO
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 29, 2017 15:35:31 GMT
If you don't agree with demonising the poor on the basis of bedrooms, terrifying the elderly on the basis of their care and meagre incomes or aren't in favour of tipping the sick out of their wheelchairs into minimum wage jobs, you're a Trot in Rog's eyes! Here you go comrades..... View AttachmentNow at least have the bollocks to call your Great Leader a spade? Somehow, I think not. You Lefties are always looking for someone else to blame. Always looking for someone else to pay for shit. Always protesting about something else apart from your own inadequacies. You could always show your collective spirit and buy your trendy Antifa T for 25 EURO Are you now saying that Corbyn has actively courted the Socialist Worker Party and then won 40% of the popular vote. You're having a special few days on here Rog, you really are I suppose it could be worse he could actually change the laws and ally himself to the party you know like the Tory party did with the filthy Polish Law and Justice party in Europe until quite recently!
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Jun 29, 2017 15:53:21 GMT
If you don't agree with demonising the poor on the basis of bedrooms, terrifying the elderly on the basis of their care and meagre incomes or aren't in favour of tipping the sick out of their wheelchairs into minimum wage jobs, you're a Trot in Rog's eyes! Here you go comrades..... View AttachmentNow at least have the bollocks to call your Great Leader a spade? Somehow, I think not. You Lefties are always looking for someone else to blame. Always looking for someone else to pay for shit. Always protesting about something else apart from your own inadequacies. You could always show your collective spirit and buy your trendy Antifa T for 25 EURO Roger you really don't have to share with us what you buy on the internet you know, I know you still supporting those with the bullet and the bomb but the rest of us don't
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Jun 29, 2017 16:21:47 GMT
Ah, the democratic Labour Party, Chukkup Ummuna asking for a vote to remain in the Single Market and Customs Union knowing full well that the EU have said this comes with free movement of people and services. So not really leaving the EU.
Labour's whip advice.... abstain. Respecting the EU ref result my arse. The fun is how many Lab MP's are going to tell Corbo to get lost. Vote in 10 mins.........
EDIT: 49 Labour MP's stick two fingers up to Corbo's abstain whip.
|
|
|
Post by capto on Jun 29, 2017 16:29:28 GMT
If you don't agree with demonising the poor on the basis of bedrooms, terrifying the elderly on the basis of their care and meagre incomes or aren't in favour of tipping the sick out of their wheelchairs into minimum wage jobs, you're a Trot in Rog's eyes! Here you go comrades..... View AttachmentNow at least have the bollocks to call your Great Leader a spade? Somehow, I think not. You Lefties are always looking for someone else to blame. Always looking for someone else to pay for shit. Always protesting about something else apart from your own inadequacies. You could always show your collective spirit and buy your trendy Antifa T for 25 EURO Attachment Deleted
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Jun 29, 2017 16:46:55 GMT
Why the obsession Mary? What's it all about? Am I speaking in Arabic? Nothing like getting to the heart of the problem
|
|