|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Feb 18, 2017 17:24:40 GMT
I'm not on Twatter but anyone who is ought to slaughter the hypocritical, cheating little shitehawk.
|
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Feb 18, 2017 17:25:37 GMT
I'm not on Twatter but anyone who is ought to slaughter the hypocritical, cheating little shitehawk. Dunna worry mate he's been hammered all afternoon👍 |
|
|
|
Post by turtlefox on Feb 18, 2017 17:32:05 GMT
Value added tax. If you play in a bigger league you are worth more. That doesn't necessarily mean that you are a better player. Just someone who fits into a managers system. Bar the odd great. My point was that most of the over inflated prices for players are just that. VAT. Early on in my career as a Customs Officer I used to be a VAT man in Wolverhampton and I have actually visited Walsall FC and verified their VAT accounts which included VAT on their player purchases and sales. But you've still lost me on the point you are making. VAT is levied (currently at 20%) on all sales of players between UK clubs - different rules apply to sales within Europe and on sales from UK clubs to clubs outside Europe. But the VAT, where it is levied, is a simple flat rate on the sale price whether that player is a multi £million player or costs only a few hundred £thousand. Im not talking about VAT. I'm talking about how much money is put into a player depending on which league they are playing in and how much they are actually worth. VAT was just a metaphore for how much they were overated in the scheme of things. |
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Feb 18, 2017 17:32:07 GMT
I'm not on Twatter but anyone who is ought to slaughter the hypocritical, cheating little shitehawk. Dunna worry mate he's been hammered all afternoon👍 Well done that man. I take it your typing fingers back in action then?  |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Feb 18, 2017 17:34:50 GMT
Dunna worry mate he's been hammered all afternoon👍 Well done that man. I take it your typing fingers back in action then? Only the one I never had operated on👍 |
|
|
|
Post by cooper67 on Feb 18, 2017 23:27:46 GMT
Great result for Lincoln.
And Matt Rhead was great.But how bad is his combover?
|
|
|
|
Post by FbrgVaStkFan on Feb 19, 2017 0:38:31 GMT
Great result for Lincoln. And Matt Rhead was great.But how bad is his combover? He (like Trump) should just shave that mop and let it shine baby. Less is more. |
|
|
|
Post by mouseykanga2 on Feb 19, 2017 9:01:31 GMT
Matt rhead .....Lincoln centre forward.....from stoke !
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2017 9:03:07 GMT
Go get him Sparky
|
|
|
|
Post by mattador78 on Feb 19, 2017 9:17:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 19, 2017 9:17:32 GMT
Everybody knows what Barton is. But the punditry by Trevor Sinclair about the incident on MOTD was disgraceful. Refusing to say anything bad about his blatant cheating because 'he's a mate' should see him out of a job.
|
|
|
|
Post by ElworthPotter on Feb 19, 2017 9:22:08 GMT
I know Barton got booked after the stamping then feigning injury scenario yesterday means he can't get a retrospective ban for it but could he get one for the hand to the face of one of the Lincoln players not long afterwards?
|
|
|
|
Post by mattador78 on Feb 19, 2017 9:26:17 GMT
I know Barton got booked after the stamping then feigning injury scenario yesterday means he can't get a retrospective ban for it but could he get one for the hand to the face of one of the Lincoln players not long afterwards? No he got booked for the hand to the faceelse so can still face retrospective for the stamp |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2017 9:50:35 GMT
Once again confusion reigns, this was a reply about Mark Rhead, Lincoln striker from Stoke, but admin seem to think it should be merged with a totally unrelated thread... |
|
|
|
Post by malteser68 on Feb 19, 2017 12:16:35 GMT
That's disgraceful. Deserves a 3 game ban for that - but I'm sure he won't get it. :-( Deserves a 3-year ban not a 3-match ban for that What a sorry excuse for a human being; a rodent which lives in a gutter has more class than him |
|
|
|
Post by stokefanone on Feb 19, 2017 12:33:08 GMT
Three incidents Barton could have been disciplined for. The first was a leading elbow which gave the Lincoln player a black eye, that could easily have been a sending off. Then he feigned being punched and later, the slap/punch on the winger. So glad Rheady and co fucked the claret cunts good and proper, COME ON YOU RED AND WHITES!
|
|
|
|
Post by conzdad on Feb 19, 2017 13:12:04 GMT
Cant wait for work on Monday to take the piss out of the six fingered deluded half wits who still think they're better than us although the recent result at the 365 and league table says it all.
|
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Feb 19, 2017 13:34:50 GMT
The MOTD pundits excelled in their vapidity when they spoke about Joey Barton limiting themselves to "Joey will be disappointed with himself" and "That's want you get with Joey" instead of unambiguous criticism I.e. Saying his conduct was wholly unacceptable and there are no mitigating circumstances (not even Mr Barton's pretensions to understanding Nietzsche).
Supporters find this behaviour distasteful (meaning feigning injury although you could say the same for apologist MOTD pundits) but clearly the players don't.
And that's why it will continue.
|
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Feb 19, 2017 14:58:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2017 17:17:30 GMT
Herewith, a man craving attention
how do you deal with him ?
dont give him any - whatsoever
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 19, 2017 17:25:43 GMT
The MOTD pundits excelled in their vapidity when they spoke about Joey Barton limiting themselves to "Joey will be disappointed with himself" and "That's want you get with Joey" instead of unambiguous criticism I.e. Saying his conduct was wholly unacceptable and there are no mitigating circumstances (not even Mr Barton's pretensions to understanding Nietzsche). Supporters find this behaviour distasteful (meaning feigning injury although you could say the same for apologist MOTD pundits) but clearly the players don't. And that's why it will continue. That's just how they are. I mean you wouldn't get Hartson calling a footballer a cheat would you.* *Yes that was sarcasm - I can't find the smileys on my phone. |
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Feb 19, 2017 18:35:20 GMT
Someone owes me 1 million quid.
|
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 20, 2017 8:56:09 GMT
Someone owes me 1 million quid. If it was a bet about Barton behaving like a twat, nobody would have taken it on |
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Feb 20, 2017 9:06:56 GMT
Someone owes me 1 million quid. If it was a bet about Barton behaving like a twat, nobody would have taken it on No, he said Lincoln would draw Arsenal. He should've gambled. |
|
|
|
Post by malteser68 on Feb 20, 2017 18:10:51 GMT
I'll bet 1 million quid Lincoln draw Arsenal. Nostradamus himself !!!!!!!! |
|
