|
Post by samba :) on Oct 25, 2015 23:59:50 GMT
I enjoy the arguments funny character building things
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 0:24:16 GMT
I think the retard majority of fair weather fans is the issue, I read the EE board and aren't overly bothered by the ego-tistical nature of some of the posters. People originally join this site because they support this football club, not for political discussion. The EE board is easily avoidable if you are a poster on this forum, as you dont see many off the main board post on here. For me I put it down the wrist slashing imbecile come-lately's The problem with a lot of what's been posted on here mate is that it's an embarrassment to the Oatcake, the club, the city even. Really doesn't reflect well on us or do anything to highlight what a sound bunch most Stokies are. It needs combating for that reason alone.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2015 1:18:23 GMT
In fairness, some of them leaving will help to cut down on some of the boring fucking political/Muslim/shit threads that've ruined this section of the forum over the last couple of years. As opposed to your namby pamby left wing Tory hating apologetic clap trap day in day out. That's what forums are for, debate, not a general tree hugging love in.
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on Oct 26, 2015 1:25:55 GMT
I think the retard majority of fair weather fans is the issue, I read the EE board and aren't overly bothered by the ego-tistical nature of some of the posters. People originally join this site because they support this football club, not for political discussion. The EE board is easily avoidable if you are a poster on this forum, as you dont see many off the main board post on here. For me I put it down the wrist slashing imbecile come-lately's The problem with a lot of what's been posted on here mate is that it's an embarrassment to the Oatcake, the club, the city even. Really doesn't reflect well on us or do anything to highlight what a sound bunch most Stokies are. It needs combating for that reason alone. I've quite often read about EE board being embarrassing - but haven't really seen it myself. Where are these embarrassing threads and posts?
|
|
|
Post by britsabroad on Oct 26, 2015 4:01:42 GMT
I think the retard majority of fair weather fans is the issue, I read the EE board and aren't overly bothered by the ego-tistical nature of some of the posters. People originally join this site because they support this football club, not for political discussion. The EE board is easily avoidable if you are a poster on this forum, as you dont see many off the main board post on here. For me I put it down the wrist slashing imbecile come-lately's The problem with a lot of what's been posted on here mate is that it's an embarrassment to the Oatcake, the club, the city even. Really doesn't reflect well on us or do anything to highlight what a sound bunch most Stokies are. It needs combating for that reason alone. The problem with the board is a particular nutjob creating multiple personalities to bait people and trigger arguments. Everyone of all viewpoints coexisted just fine until he arrived. But you wouldn't know anything about that would you.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 7:41:01 GMT
The problem with a lot of what's been posted on here mate is that it's an embarrassment to the Oatcake, the club, the city even. Really doesn't reflect well on us or do anything to highlight what a sound bunch most Stokies are. It needs combating for that reason alone. I've quite often read about EE board being embarrassing - but haven't really seen it myself. Where are these embarrassing threads and posts? The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 7:45:27 GMT
The problem with a lot of what's been posted on here mate is that it's an embarrassment to the Oatcake, the club, the city even. Really doesn't reflect well on us or do anything to highlight what a sound bunch most Stokies are. It needs combating for that reason alone. The problem with the board is a particular nutjob creating multiple personalities to bait people and trigger arguments. Everyone of all viewpoints coexisted just fine until he arrived. But you wouldn't know anything about that would you. I wouldn't mate no. Sorry to disappoint. I do know where you might find a Man Utd forum more suited to your tastes though. Even by your standards, the claim that everyone on here "coexisted just fine" before ************** is the biggest load of bollocks I've ever heard. ![:D](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/kwfoKwtHI0jglJZ4qZf6.gif)
|
|
|
Post by britsabroad on Oct 26, 2015 7:47:22 GMT
The problem with the board is a particular nutjob creating multiple personalities to bait people and trigger arguments. Everyone of all viewpoints coexisted just fine until he arrived. But you wouldn't know anything about that would you. I wouldn't mate no. Sorry to disappoint. I do know where you might find a Man Utd forum more suited to your tastes though. Even by your standards, the claim that everyone on here "coexisted just fine" before ************** is the biggest load of bollocks I've ever heard. ![:D](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/kwfoKwtHI0jglJZ4qZf6.gif) Well as you only joined in July, how would you know?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 7:50:09 GMT
I wouldn't mate no. Sorry to disappoint. I do know where you might find a Man Utd forum more suited to your tastes though. Even by your standards, the claim that everyone on here "coexisted just fine" before ************** is the biggest load of bollocks I've ever heard. ![:D](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/kwfoKwtHI0jglJZ4qZf6.gif) Well as you only joined in July, how would you know? As already explained, long-time reader short-time poster. There are plenty that I know of who have never posted but read the site regularly and know the posters well. Not that unthinkable is it?
|
|
|
Post by countofmontecristo on Oct 26, 2015 9:24:17 GMT
I've quite often read about EE board being embarrassing - but haven't really seen it myself. Where are these embarrassing threads and posts? The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules. Or could suggest that he's read similar remarks repeated by your myriad incarnations! ![(whistle)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/u7JMveaFGUL6du8bflWQ.gif)
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Oct 26, 2015 9:44:18 GMT
I've quite often read about EE board being embarrassing - but haven't really seen it myself. Where are these embarrassing threads and posts? The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules. Who are all these rage quitters ? . Bish who was one of the most uncontroversial posters took a load of personal abuse one day for no reason and just quit . Or fraise who just had enough of all the rubbishy on here . Lots of others who just don't post anymore . It's a great shame IMO
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Oct 26, 2015 10:02:32 GMT
Personally, and off the top of my head, I thought the threads about the women fancying a bit of privacy and arranging a private session at Waterworld and the one with the photo of a woman in a burkha in an ice cream van were fairly embarrassing. I stopped reading and responding to them after that. Grown men acting like kids.
On a more individual level, the poster referring to golliwogs as "ni**ers" and continually using the casual racial slur "fuzzies" was an embarassment to the board and will be so again when he crawls back. It won't be long now.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 10:04:58 GMT
The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules. Or could suggest that he's read similar remarks repeated by your myriad incarnations! ![(whistle)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/u7JMveaFGUL6du8bflWQ.gif) You could suggest that yes count - if you enjoy imagining that the foul stuff mumf, carps et all spewed is perfectly socially acceptable and that it's just a lone madman who smashed fuck out of them and drove them off the board. Whatever makes you feel better pal. But out here in the real world I'm afraid you're wrong. Again. Times have changed. ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/KYqg3pYeaerc5lD_P7BR.gif)
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on Oct 26, 2015 10:08:03 GMT
I've quite often read about EE board being embarrassing - but haven't really seen it myself. Where are these embarrassing threads and posts? The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules. Most of the descriptions of the EE board as "embarrassing" are from the same group on the left who inhabit the EE board. If posts are homophobic and racist - why haven't you reported them? As I've said before, I know Sal is one of the right wing loons ( sorry Sal, just trying to make a point ![:-*](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/ibsKtmyxvmCS4ld9vDzv.gif) ), but I'm sure she'd act on inappropriate posts. There are plenty of abusive posts - but those come from both sides (and you know it).
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 10:14:29 GMT
The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules. Who are all these rage quitters ? . Bish who was one of the most uncontroversial posters took a load of personal abuse one day for no reason and just quit . Or fraise who just had enough of all the rubbishy on here . Lots of others who just don't post anymore . It's a great shame IMO As I'm sure fraise himself said when he was strutting it like a feudal Lord, if he didn't like what was being posted he didn't have to read it did he? And Bispham was certainly prone to dishing out fairly snide comments and then crying foul as soon as anyone gave anything remotely robust back. But no the main ragequitters I'm referring to are mumf and, seemingly, carps. They were offered doses of their own medicine and, well, they didn't last long did they? If you genuinely think it's a great shame that that pair have scuttled off back under their little rock, then I suggest you find some kind of far right forum. No doubt there'll be plenty of their sort on there offering similarly well-thought-out erudite conversation ![:D](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/kwfoKwtHI0jglJZ4qZf6.gif)
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on Oct 26, 2015 10:21:15 GMT
The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules. Who are all these rage quitters ? . Bish who was one of the most uncontroversial posters took a load of personal abuse one day for no reason and just quit . Or fraise who just had enough of all the rubbishy on here . Lots of others who just don't post anymore . It's a great shame IMO It's strange isn't it... The left are accusing the people on the right of doing all the abuse... but the people who are just fed up with the abuse and the shit that's going on are Bishp, Fraise & mumf - chaps who I'm believe would be all considered to be right of centre.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2015 10:24:58 GMT
The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules. Most of the descriptions of the EE board as "embarrassing" are from the same group on the left who inhabit the EE board. If posts are homophobic and racist - why haven't you reported them? As I've said before, I know Sal is one of the right wing loons ( sorry Sal, just trying to make a point ![:-*](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/ibsKtmyxvmCS4ld9vDzv.gif) ), but I'm sure she'd act on inappropriate posts. There are plenty of abusive posts - but those come from both sides (and you know it). Just catching up on this from over the weekend... But, I can say for certain that the moderation of this forum is non-existent. I have reported posters for homophobia and racism, both explicit and implicit, and to my knowledge there have been no bans. The poster that has quit routinely uses the word "queer" and crudely disguises racial language through use of the term "fuzzies", but gets away with saying pretty much as he (they) likes. My thinking is that there's a tacit agreement in place whereby they all disguise their hate speech in a fairly unsophisticated fashion, and the mods leave them alone. As suggested above, it is embarrassing. It's funny to suggest that anyone has been run off here too. There are a handful on here that clearly hunt in a pack and use a set of techniques that they've obviously colluded on, particularly including straw man arguments and a deliberate failure to understand or argue the points being made. Maybe they are just as stupid as they appear.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 10:27:27 GMT
The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules. Most of the descriptions of the EE board as "embarrassing" are from the same group on the left who inhabit the EE board. If posts are homophobic and racist - why haven't you reported them? As I've said before, I know Sal is one of the right wing loons ( sorry Sal, just trying to make a point ![:-*](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/ibsKtmyxvmCS4ld9vDzv.gif) ), but I'm sure she'd act on inappropriate posts. There are plenty of abusive posts - but those come from both sides (and you know it). I know it well yes mate. Never said otherwise. But there's only one side on here who gave out the harshest abuse and then went crying to admin and ragequit when some heat came back at em. As long as mumf and his acolytes are around, it's impossible to have a reasoned debate about anything. The board is better for them not being on it and I think most people would agree with that. I'm sorry if you don't. And what's the point of reporting stuff? Nothing gets done about it. You can get banned for being wrongly thought to be some guy in Thailand but not for repeatedly using the language mumf did. It's bonkers. As with all bullies, you sometimes have to stand up against them. And as with most bullies, mumf ran a mile when confronted. ![:D](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/kwfoKwtHI0jglJZ4qZf6.gif) Just for the record I know PLENTY of people who read these boards but never post on them - they find some of the stuff on EE embarrassing to both club and city. And no I'm not aiming that at you ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/KYqg3pYeaerc5lD_P7BR.gif)
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Oct 26, 2015 10:33:07 GMT
It became shit from the day it changed from the GDB to EE.
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Oct 26, 2015 11:14:41 GMT
The fact that by your own acceptance you've "often read" about the EE board being embarrassing would suggest that there are plenty out there who'd agree with my assessment. Some of the stuff mumf has posted - to pick on just one of the ragequitters - is fairly obviously homophobic, racist, personally abusive as you must know mate. In direct contravention of ProBoards rules. Most of the descriptions of the EE board as "embarrassing" are from the same group on the left who inhabit the EE board. If posts are homophobic and racist - why haven't you reported them? As I've said before, I know Sal is one of the right wing loons ( sorry Sal, just trying to make a point ![:-*](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/ibsKtmyxvmCS4ld9vDzv.gif) ), but I'm sure she'd act on inappropriate posts. There are plenty of abusive posts - but those come from both sides (and you know it). There has been abusive posts from both sides, hopefully this sort of stuff dies down a bit now. I'd like to point out that mumf was warned by admin for making homophobic remarks and since then he was clever enough to cover himself with posts that could be interpreted in different ways, so he wasn't breaking any rules but anyone with a decent understanding of English language would know that he made repeated inferences regarding the sexuality of huddysleftfoot that displayed a clear homophobic attitude which is unacceptable in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Oct 26, 2015 11:36:23 GMT
Who are all these rage quitters ? . Bish who was one of the most uncontroversial posters took a load of personal abuse one day for no reason and just quit . Or fraise who just had enough of all the rubbishy on here . Lots of others who just don't post anymore . It's a great shame IMO It's strange isn't it... The left are accusing the people on the right of doing all the abuse... but the people who are just fed up with the abuse and the shit that's going on are Bishp, Fraise & mumf - chaps who I'm believe would be all considered to be right of centre. I think there is a general "internet" problem of people at the extremes with too much time on their hands taking over discussions and turning them into arguments which inevitably descend into vitriolic, point scoring, sterile slanging matches. That puts off moderate types, hollows out the centre ground and makes any reasonable debate futile. I've no problem with two of the chaps you have mentioned. The other guy is a dick though.
|
|
|
Post by countofmontecristo on Oct 26, 2015 11:44:11 GMT
Or could suggest that he's read similar remarks repeated by your myriad incarnations! ![(whistle)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/u7JMveaFGUL6du8bflWQ.gif) You could suggest that yes count - if you enjoy imagining that the foul stuff mumf, carps et all spewed is perfectly socially acceptable and that it's just a lone madman who smashed fuck out of them and drove them off the board. Whatever makes you feel better pal. But out here in the real world I'm afraid you're wrong. Again. Times have changed. ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/KYqg3pYeaerc5lD_P7BR.gif) Which 'real world' of yours are you referring to **************?
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Oct 26, 2015 12:03:54 GMT
Further to my point about the "internet problem" -
There was a damned good reason why discussion of politics and religion used to be banned in pubs. Nothing to do with the restriction of free speech but simple common sense on the part of the landlord. Once the fighting and glassings started, the decent regulars moved on to a quieter establishment. The pub acquired a reputation, attracting more idiots and trouble. The landlord eventually loses his license and the pub closes.
|
|
|
Post by countofmontecristo on Oct 26, 2015 12:10:41 GMT
Further to my point about the "internet problem" - There was a damned good reason why discussion of politics and religion used to be banned in pubs. Nothing to do with the restriction of free speech but simple common sense on the part of the landlord. Once the fighting and glassings started, the decent regulars moved on to a quieter establishment. The pub acquired a reputation, attracting more idiots and trouble. The landlord eventually loses his license and the pub closes. I've never known a pub where you can't talk about those things. A wet dream of a pub for those of a totalitarian bent though. It would suit you down to the ground ************** - all of you!
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Oct 26, 2015 12:13:52 GMT
Further to my point about the "internet problem" - There was a damned good reason why discussion of politics and religion used to be banned in pubs. Nothing to do with the restriction of free speech but simple common sense on the part of the landlord. Once the fighting and glassings started, the decent regulars moved on to a quieter establishment. The pub acquired a reputation, attracting more idiots and trouble. The landlord eventually loses his license and the pub closes. I've never known a pub where you can't talk about those things. A wet dream of a pub for the those of a totalitarian bent though. It would suit you down to the ground ************** - all of you! Well I suspect I'm a little older than you. <smiley>
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 12:25:51 GMT
You could suggest that yes count - if you enjoy imagining that the foul stuff mumf, carps et all spewed is perfectly socially acceptable and that it's just a lone madman who smashed fuck out of them and drove them off the board. Whatever makes you feel better pal. But out here in the real world I'm afraid you're wrong. Again. Times have changed. ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/KYqg3pYeaerc5lD_P7BR.gif) Which 'real world' of yours are you referring to **************? Whoever and wherever he is, ************** should be very flattered that so many of you assume that only he has the clout to send mumf and co whimpering from this board like a load of fucking sissies. Again though, I'm not him I'm afraid ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/KYqg3pYeaerc5lD_P7BR.gif)
|
|
|
Post by britsabroad on Oct 26, 2015 12:26:01 GMT
Well as you only joined in July, how would you know? As already explained, long-time reader short-time poster. There are plenty that I know of who have never posted but read the site regularly and know the posters well. Not that unthinkable is it? Do all these friends of yours also answer to the name **************?
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 12:33:29 GMT
As already explained, long-time reader short-time poster. There are plenty that I know of who have never posted but read the site regularly and know the posters well. Not that unthinkable is it? Do all these friends of yours also answer to the name **************? See previous answer to countfuckula ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/KYqg3pYeaerc5lD_P7BR.gif)
|
|
|
Post by countofmontecristo on Oct 26, 2015 12:35:00 GMT
Which 'real world' of yours are you referring to **************? Whoever and wherever he is, ************** should be very flattered that so many of you assume that only he has the clout to send mumf and co whimpering from this board like a load of fucking sissies. Again though, I'm not him I'm afraid ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/KYqg3pYeaerc5lD_P7BR.gif) - Rather homophobic undertones in that post mate - get Derrida or Skankmonkey to give you a bollocking. A type of self-flagellation if you like.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Oct 26, 2015 12:47:58 GMT
Whoever and wherever he is, ************** should be very flattered that so many of you assume that only he has the clout to send mumf and co whimpering from this board like a load of fucking sissies. Again though, I'm not him I'm afraid ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/KYqg3pYeaerc5lD_P7BR.gif) - Rather homophobic undertones in that post mate - get Derrida or Skankmonkey to give you a bollocking. A type of self-flagellation if you like. Dictionary definition of "sissy" is weak, feeble and/or effeminate. If those are qualities that you think are inherent in homosexuals then I'd suggest you're the one with the homophobic undertones youth ![:)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/KYqg3pYeaerc5lD_P7BR.gif)
|
|