|
Post by copey1019 on Apr 11, 2015 22:18:28 GMT
Always wondered whether he'd be any good in Whelan's position, it would definitely be worth a try!
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 22:18:53 GMT
No
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 22:22:57 GMT
HE doesn't want to play there but honestly what is the attribute he is missing to stop him being good there. It'll be Sergi Roberto next season anyways
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Apr 11, 2015 22:23:26 GMT
He doesn't want to play there, sees himself as a CB.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 22:24:09 GMT
Why bother posting? Honestly, trying to refrain from being a bellend for 5 minutes
|
|
|
Post by sufolkstokie on Apr 11, 2015 22:24:43 GMT
You can not say that when we have not tried Looks like he is not first choice c/b which I do not agree with We are starting to see more Glenda than Glenn again We are safe - so why not test it out? Otherwise we risk losing a very good player
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Apr 11, 2015 22:24:54 GMT
HE doesn't want to play there but honestly what is the attribute he is missing to stop him being good there. It'll be Sergi Roberto next season anyways Discipline.
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Apr 11, 2015 22:25:40 GMT
You can not say that when we have not tried Looks like he is not first choice c/b which I do not agree with We are starting to see more Glenda than Glenn again We are safe - so why not test it out? Otherwise we risk losing a very good player No one can really say who first choice right now given the injuries.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 22:27:41 GMT
Why bother posting? Honestly, trying to refrain from being a bellend for 5 minutes He's a centre back. He's our second best centre back. He wants to play centre back. No seemed like the easiest and most obvious answer.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 22:28:43 GMT
You can not say that when we have not tried Looks like he is not first choice c/b which I do not agree with We are starting to see more Glenda than Glenn again We are safe - so why not test it out? Otherwise we risk losing a very good player He should be at centre back and nothing else. And we do risk that, it's one of the reason I'm getting on Hughes' back!
|
|
|
Post by sufolkstokie on Apr 11, 2015 22:31:34 GMT
You can not say that when we have not tried Looks like he is not first choice c/b which I do not agree with We are starting to see more Glenda than Glenn again We are safe - so why not test it out? Otherwise we risk losing a very good player No one can really say who first choice right now given the injuries. What injuries at Centre Back? Clear as day that Ryan/Wolly first choice
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 22:32:06 GMT
No one can really say who first choice right now given the injuries. What injuries at Centre Back? Clear as day that Ryan/Wolly first choice It is and what a joke that is.
|
|
|
Post by rednwhite43 on Apr 11, 2015 22:32:18 GMT
Wluld love to see him there
|
|
|
Post by StokieAsh13 on Apr 11, 2015 22:32:45 GMT
Hes a CB without doubt, however he has all the attributes to play DM
|
|
|
Post by sufolkstokie on Apr 11, 2015 22:32:54 GMT
You can not say that when we have not tried Looks like he is not first choice c/b which I do not agree with We are starting to see more Glenda than Glenn again We are safe - so why not test it out? Otherwise we risk losing a very good player He should be at centre back and nothing else. And we do risk that, it's one of the reason I'm getting on Hughes' back! Turps bath part two Agree However, I would like to see him tried in the Whelan role - you don't try, you don't know
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 22:35:08 GMT
He should be at centre back and nothing else. And we do risk that, it's one of the reason I'm getting on Hughes' back! Turps bath part two Agree However, I would like to see him tried in the Whelan role - you don't try, you don't know I want him in central defence and no where else really. Gone are the days we should be trying to shoehorn players into positions they aren't comfortable/don't want play in. It's a sad state of affairs really.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 22:40:50 GMT
Why bother posting? Honestly, trying to refrain from being a bellend for 5 minutes He's a centre back. He's our second best centre back. He wants to play centre back. No seemed like the easiest and most obvious answer. Why not contribute to the thread by validating your answer with your above points in the first place? It's not a fucking poll its not that hard to validate why you answered what you did
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 22:42:16 GMT
He's a centre back. He's our second best centre back. He wants to play centre back. No seemed like the easiest and most obvious answer. Why not contribute to the thread by validating your answer with your above points in the first place? It's not a fucking poll its not that hard to validate why you answered what you did Because I've validated 304 times before every time this ridiculous idea crops up. It doesn't need validating.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 22:45:06 GMT
Why not contribute to the thread by validating your answer with your above points in the first place? It's not a fucking poll its not that hard to validate why you answered what you did Because I've validated 304 times before every time this ridiculous idea crops up. It doesn't need validating. Then ignore the thread, why bump a thread you believe is pointless? Why pay it any attention?
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 22:46:36 GMT
Because I've validated 304 times before every time this ridiculous idea crops up. It doesn't need validating. Then ignore the thread, why bump a thread you believe is pointless? Why pay it any attention? Because silly ideas need beating down on. It's a why good old no suffices.
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Apr 11, 2015 22:47:35 GMT
No one can really say who first choice right now given the injuries. What injuries at Centre Back? Clear as day that Ryan/Wolly first choice Muni is injured or has been and is just coming back.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 22:51:15 GMT
Then ignore the thread, why bump a thread you believe is pointless? Why pay it any attention? Because silly ideas need beating down on. It's a why good old no suffices. The thing is it's a silly idea in your opinion. You seem to hold your opinion as a fact, it's not. Because you have 75,000 odd posts doesn't make your opinions more valid then mine, the OPs or anyone elses'. He's entitled to think Muni might be good in the Whelan role, it's not a revolutionary thought and like you can provide reasons as to why he'd fail there I can provide reasons to why he might be successful there. The point of a forum is to debate and not to beat down other users' ideas because you don't agree.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 22:53:05 GMT
Because silly ideas need beating down on. It's a why good old no suffices. The thing is it's a silly idea in your opinion. You seem to hold your opinion as a fact, it's not. Because you have 75,000 odd posts doesn't make your opinions more valid then mine, the OPs or anyone elses'. He's entitled to think Muni might be good in the Whelan role, it's not a revolutionary thought and like you can provide reasons as to why he'd fail there I can provide reasons to why he might be successful there. The point of a forum is to debate and not to beat down other users' ideas because you don't agree. He is and I'm entitled to think it's a silly idea and to dismiss it completely out of hand. What's your point?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2015 22:55:19 GMT
The thing is it's a silly idea in your opinion. You seem to hold your opinion as a fact, it's not. Because you have 75,000 odd posts doesn't make your opinions more valid then mine, the OPs or anyone elses'. He's entitled to think Muni might be good in the Whelan role, it's not a revolutionary thought and like you can provide reasons as to why he'd fail there I can provide reasons to why he might be successful there. The point of a forum is to debate and not to beat down other users' ideas because you don't agree. He is and I'm entitled to think it's a silly idea and to dismiss it completely out of hand. What's your point? If you really were dismissing it out of hand you'd ignore the thread. Let's be real the only reason you posted is to get attention.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 22:57:47 GMT
He is and I'm entitled to think it's a silly idea and to dismiss it completely out of hand. What's your point? If you really were dismissing it out of hand you'd ignore the thread. Let's be real the only reason you posted is to get attention. No I wouldn't, I like to argue or haven't you figured that out yet? Attention? That's just a weird accusation.
|
|
|
Post by philm87 on Apr 11, 2015 23:20:18 GMT
I don't think it's necessarily shoehorning though. It's not the same as trying to convert Ryan Shotton into a winger is it?
Muniesa is clearly the kind of bloke he can play in multiple positions. He's more than capable playing fullback. In terms of his ability on the ball, he's more than capable of playing CM. Can't see what we have to lose in trying him in that position, given that it will difficult to find a replacement for Whelan.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 23:23:08 GMT
I just don't get why you'd want to play a bloke who has excelled in the position he's natural to in a position he's rarely/never played in before. Again it wreaks of TP. I ain't a fan of that shit!
|
|
|
Post by philm87 on Apr 11, 2015 23:26:52 GMT
I just don't get why you'd want to play a bloke who has excelled in the position he's natural to in a position he's rarely/never played in before. Again it wreaks of TP. I ain't a fan of that shit! Two reasons. 1) I think he is good enough and 2) Even if you or I think Shawcross/Muniesa is our best CB partnership, Sparky obviously hasn't made up his mind yet. I'd quite fancy seeing him get a run in CM rather than him being on the bench. Having said all that, I think the only reason he isn't in the team right now is that he has just come back from injury and is still gaining fitness. No point rushing him back after a hamstring.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 11, 2015 23:31:15 GMT
I just don't get why you'd want to play a bloke who has excelled in the position he's natural to in a position he's rarely/never played in before. Again it wreaks of TP. I ain't a fan of that shit! Two reasons. 1) I think he is good enough and 2) Even if you or I think Shawcross/Muniesa is our best CB partnership, Sparky obviously hasn't made up his mind yet. I'd quite fancy seeing him get a run in CM rather than him being on the bench. Having said all that, I think the only reason he isn't in the team right now is that he has just come back from injury and is still gaining fitness. No point rushing him back after a hamstring. I don't think it is, at every turn when Wollscheid and Shawcross are fit they've been seleced whatever the situation with the others. I don't like it one bit.
|
|
|
Post by philm87 on Apr 11, 2015 23:33:43 GMT
Two reasons. 1) I think he is good enough and 2) Even if you or I think Shawcross/Muniesa is our best CB partnership, Sparky obviously hasn't made up his mind yet. I'd quite fancy seeing him get a run in CM rather than him being on the bench. Having said all that, I think the only reason he isn't in the team right now is that he has just come back from injury and is still gaining fitness. No point rushing him back after a hamstring. I don't think it is, at every turn when Wollscheid and Shawcross are fit they've been seleced whatever the situation with the others. I don't like it one bit. It's a shame, because before the injury Muniesa was really starting to look like the real deal. And having someone who could bring the ball out of defence like he could was an added bonus. I'm quite happy with Wolly though. Other than the lack of pace, I can't see what's wrong with him. Looked fairly good again today and for a big guy, he is fairly good on the ball too.
|
|