|
Post by Northy on Apr 13, 2015 4:56:14 GMT
In a scenario where 1 team spends its money upgrading it's ground to meet the criteria for promotion, and 1 uses it's money to buy players and doesn't upgrade it's ground to meet the criteria, this team then pips the team whose ground is ready for promotion, imagine if that was Stoke and Vale, there would be a lot of unhappy Stokies kicking up a fuss about rules and regulations. They are there before the season starts, clubs know them, sign into the league for that season, so should abide by them. Crystal ball job though isn't it. Were we certain that we would be promoted before the season started? Not saying there shouldn't be proper rules just that they have to be reasonable. How many teams get promoted and go straight back down.Give them that first season to comply. There's so much money as a reward though, build your club foundations first, Sent from my SM-G850F using proboards
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Apr 13, 2015 6:24:39 GMT
And there isn't a player I dislike more than Kenwyne Jones, they had go and bloody sign him didn't they! Why? I assume they signed him in the hope he would score the goals that would get them promoted ![8D](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/Fmz6MA_QgzQsf9jj3_d8.gif)
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Apr 13, 2015 14:59:05 GMT
One stand behind the goal at Dean court is a temporary one. As well as filling the corners they could potentially built and bigger permanent structure in this area, which could ensure they are not sharing for long. Brentford on the other hand have to much old terracing and given the ground is landlocked by some houses and those 4 pubs on the corner they will probably have to ground share until their new ground is built at Kew. At least it's not like Inverness when they had a 200 mile round trip to Aberdeen for their home games until their groun was upgraded. couldn't you do them a temporary train line?? Pmsl. I could out of hornby railways lol
|
|