|
Post by boskampsflaps on Sept 8, 2014 19:42:10 GMT
cahill is miles better than shawcross ffs. The only reason Cahill is playing ahead of Shawcross is because he plays for Chelsea. I'd rather have Shawcross playing in my team over Cahill any time. I think they're pretty much on par tbh.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2014 19:42:50 GMT
It makes me want to vomit watching the injustice of the selection in defence, I found myself almost wanting that shot to go in for them and it makes me feel wrong for feeling that.....supporting England shouldn't do this. I feel the same, to the extend where I'd rather see us get hammered by the Swiss and Woy sacked. There are so many players who have done nothing to justify their selection in that squad, a manager who has done nothing to justify he is capable of the job and has no interest in more than half of the teams in the league, and to top it off we've got an out of form degenerate scumbag captaining the team, the national pride has completely gone and I can't see it returning any time soon.
|
|
|
Post by adi on Sept 8, 2014 19:46:06 GMT
The only reason Cahill is playing ahead of Shawcross is because he plays for Chelsea. I'd rather have Shawcross playing in my team over Cahill any time. I think they're pretty much on par tbh. I'll allow Cahill and Shawcross then
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Sept 8, 2014 19:47:11 GMT
cahill is miles better than shawcross ffs. The only reason Cahill is playing ahead of Shawcross is because he plays for Chelsea. I'd rather have Shawcross playing in my team over Cahill any time. If Cahill played for us and Shawcross played foe Chelsea, who would Woy pick I wonder.
|
|
|
Post by kenwyne on Sept 8, 2014 19:51:10 GMT
cahill is miles better than shawcross ffs. The only reason Cahill is playing ahead of Shawcross is because he plays for Chelsea. I'd rather have Shawcross playing in my team over Cahill any time. I don't think so. Cahill is much better passing out of the back and more of a threat on set pieces. He's also more agile and keep up with quicker attackers while being just as strong in the air.
|
|
|
Post by kenwyne on Sept 8, 2014 19:52:00 GMT
The only reason Cahill is playing ahead of Shawcross is because he plays for Chelsea. I'd rather have Shawcross playing in my team over Cahill any time. If Cahill played for us and Shawcross played foe Chelsea, who would Woy pick I wonder. I would happily do that swap with chelsea and i like shawcross
|
|
|
Post by pyrus on Sept 8, 2014 19:53:39 GMT
Does anyone else think Raheem Stirling was better when he was in Difff'rent Strokes
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Sept 8, 2014 19:53:35 GMT
Clive. 'We have to remember this is only sterlings 7th start'
Try 16 minutes you moby.
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Sept 8, 2014 19:54:37 GMT
Does anyone else think Raheem Stirling was better when he was in Difff'rent Strokes preferred him during the summer in big brother
|
|
|
Post by 2004 on Sept 8, 2014 19:55:53 GMT
Cahill can run and has a good shot but that is not what a defender is for. He is one of the biggest bottlers I've ever seen.
|
|
|
Post by salmon69 on Sept 8, 2014 19:56:22 GMT
shawcross would be more of a threat if HE played for chelsea
|
|
|
Post by adi on Sept 8, 2014 19:59:59 GMT
Absolute gift!
|
|
|
Post by 2004 on Sept 8, 2014 20:00:04 GMT
Austria good start to 2nd half. several misses already. Marko some lovely effective passing. Is he managing to beat his man?
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Sept 8, 2014 19:59:54 GMT
Get in.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2014 20:00:25 GMT
Shinner!
|
|
|
Post by 2004 on Sept 8, 2014 20:00:39 GMT
Lovely shin
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2014 20:00:59 GMT
Get in Superb goal on the break
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on Sept 8, 2014 20:01:13 GMT
Bloody hell Welbeck son, could have gone anywhere.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2014 20:02:22 GMT
Pick that fucker out lovely football
|
|
|
Post by coates on Sept 8, 2014 20:03:47 GMT
The only reason Cahill is playing ahead of Shawcross is because he plays for Chelsea. I'd rather have Shawcross playing in my team over Cahill any time. I don't think so. Cahill is much better passing out of the back and more of a threat on set pieces. He's also more agile and keep up with quicker attackers while being just as strong in the air. If he played for hull he wouldn't get a look in.
|
|
|
Post by kenwyne on Sept 8, 2014 20:04:53 GMT
only a matter of time till raheem is playing for real madrid, i reckon
|
|
|
Post by kenwyne on Sept 8, 2014 20:06:30 GMT
I don't think so. Cahill is much better passing out of the back and more of a threat on set pieces. He's also more agile and keep up with quicker attackers while being just as strong in the air. If he played for hull he wouldn't get a look in. we need to stop using this excuse, cahill got called in when he was with bolton
|
|
|
Post by coates on Sept 8, 2014 20:07:44 GMT
If he played for hull he wouldn't get a look in. we need to stop using this excuse, cahill got called in when he was with bolton Cahill got done by Kenny miller enough said.
|
|
|
Post by bmstoke on Sept 8, 2014 20:09:46 GMT
If he played for hull he wouldn't get a look in. we need to stop using this excuse, cahill got called in when he was with bolton We? Your'e a Cardiff fan.
|
|
|
Post by kenwyne on Sept 8, 2014 20:11:09 GMT
we need to stop using this excuse, cahill got called in when he was with bolton We? Your'e a Cardiff fan. excuse me?
|
|
|
Post by Mint Berry Barks on Sept 8, 2014 20:11:31 GMT
Brilliant by Cahill.
|
|
|
Post by adi on Sept 8, 2014 20:11:30 GMT
Cheating from England. Stay classy england
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2014 20:11:50 GMT
There ya go. All you Cahill haters need to hang your heads in shame
|
|
|
Post by adi on Sept 8, 2014 20:12:29 GMT
There ya go. All you Cahill haters need to hang your heads in shame Handball to boot
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on Sept 8, 2014 20:12:59 GMT
If he played for hull he wouldn't get a look in. we need to stop using this excuse, cahill got called in when he was with bolton If you compare Cahill's and Shawcross' stats for last season, they are actually remarkably similar, that's how I see them anyway, very similar.
|
|