|
|
Post by chattyladypotter on Nov 2, 2013 19:11:43 GMT
embarrassing prick 'Hughes must go now he is a plank'  |
|
|
|
Post by kingstokie on Nov 2, 2013 19:12:31 GMT
Heard that on the way back. Bloody embarrassing!
|
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Muttley on Nov 2, 2013 19:14:02 GMT
He was a joke BUT I thought even more embarrassing we're Lee fookin Blakeman and Denis Smith
|
|
|
|
Post by stokie25 on Nov 2, 2013 19:16:43 GMT
'Sharon' text in to say the same, bless her  She thinks Pulis is the answer (has she been in a coma for the last 2 years)?  The play is far better than the 18 months before this season but we are not converting our chances or holding any sort of formation (that i can identify, anyway). We ARE creating chances thougfh and have a more attacking intent than seen for some time. We need 2 decent strikers....revolutionary thinking, i know ??? |
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 2, 2013 19:17:49 GMT
He was a joke BUT I thought even more embarrassing we're Lee fookin Blakeman and Denis Smith Go on then Serge, what did the pair of Pulis apologists say |
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Muttley on Nov 2, 2013 19:24:57 GMT
He was a joke BUT I thought even more embarrassing we're Lee fookin Blakeman and Denis Smith Go on then Serge, what did the pair of Pulis apologists say Blakeman is useless imo and regularly tries to shout down his callers as he did tonight and as for Denis great player but stop repeating yourself after every call  |
|
|
|
Post by stokemanusa on Nov 2, 2013 19:25:56 GMT
If he doesn't figure that out by jan he might be seeing sacking or something durastic. Like a big window shopping spree.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2013 19:41:31 GMT
I Thought blakeman and smith were spot on
I supported the last manager for far longer than I think he deserved, so Hughes has plenty of time to convince me yet.... two seasons for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Nov 2, 2013 19:43:33 GMT
Hughes must go? He shouldn't have been appointed in the first fuckin place! No fight and no fitness. Fuckin wank. Oh well, at least it's better to watch.  |
|
|
|
Post by Fred Ferret on Nov 2, 2013 19:49:51 GMT
Hughes must go? He shouldn't have been appointed in the first fuckin place! No fight and no fitness. Fuckin wank. Oh well, at least it's better to watch. ZZZZZZZZ.  |
|
|
|
Post by Gordon Marshall on Nov 2, 2013 19:52:35 GMT
Blakeman actually quite good. Some stoke fans like that dave are just nobs.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Nov 2, 2013 19:53:12 GMT
I still maintain that some of our "supporters" are supporters of Tony Pulis and not Stoke City.
It doesn't matter who we appointed, the knives were always going to be out if he didn't get off to a flying start with 17-0 wins every game anyway, that's just the mentality of sections of our brainwashed support.
I'm not impressed with the performances or the position in the league table but I'm willing to give Sparky at least a season before judging him properly, he's walked into an aging, limited squad and seemingly wasn't given the finances to strengthen it, but that doesn't sit well with the fans who are convinced absolutely everything is Hughes's fault and his only.
We're a special fucking club we are.
|
|
worcsstokie15
Youth Player
Different gravy
Posts: 493
Member is Online
|
Post by worcsstokie15 on Nov 2, 2013 20:07:26 GMT
Hughes must go? He shouldn't have been appointed in the first fuckin place! No fight and no fitness. Fuckin wank. Oh well, at least it's better to watch. No fight? Can you at least be a bit more constructive in your criticism. Your cliché ridden agenda is as prehistoric as your beloved messiah. He's gone! Never to return (thank fuck!). You seriously cannot expect a new manager to come in and work wonders straight away with players that clearly aren't upto the task of modern day PL football?... Or can you? |
|
|
|
Post by steveminton77 on Nov 2, 2013 20:10:07 GMT
Hughes must go? He shouldn't have been appointed in the first fuckin place! No fight and no fitness. Fuckin wank. Oh well, at least it's better to watch. So who should? If anyone is to blame it is the Board for not supporting their appointed manager in the transfer market and as a result we are now in the situation of struggling to score goals (as we have been since the FA semi). This is not a new thing. Your anti-Hughes agenda really is quite pathetic. We are creating more chances overall, more possession overall and look more balanced overall - today was extremely difficult for both sides in the conditions, the major difference was that Southampton look like a side that has spent £60m extremely well on high-quality players that have been attracted to their charismatic manager. We will also have off-days, you don't play as per Old Trafford and then like we did today because everyone is a shitter. I do think the expectations at home are holding the team back though, with perhaps some tactical refinement needed - too many poor performances at home. I'll sit here and wait for your row of rolling smiley faces now in response, as you are incapable of submitting a reasoned argument. |
|
|
|
Post by westpoint on Nov 2, 2013 20:18:03 GMT
Hughes must go? He shouldn't have been appointed in the first fuckin place! No fight and no fitness. Fuckin wank. Oh well, at least it's better to watch. So who should? If anyone is to blame it is the Board for not supporting their appointed manager in the transfer market and as a result we are now in the situation of struggling to score goals (as we have been since the FA semi). This is not a new thing. Your anti-Hughes agenda really is quite pathetic. We are creating more chances overall, more possession overall and look more balanced overall - today was extremely difficult for both sides in the conditions, the major difference was that Southampton look like a side that has spent £60m extremely well on high-quality players that have been attracted to their charismatic manager. We will also have off-days, you don't play as per Old Trafford and then like we did today because everyone is a shitter. I do think the expectations at home are holding the team back though, with perhaps some tactical refinement needed - too many poor performances at home. I'll sit here and wait for your row of rolling smiley faces now in response, as you are incapable of submitting a reasoned argument. Tactical refinement 1- Please explain 2- Who is being paid to make these 'refinements'. |
|
|
|
Post by andylgr on Nov 2, 2013 20:22:30 GMT
Dave rings up every week to moan doesn't he?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bowyer83 on Nov 2, 2013 20:28:20 GMT
Dave was a wind up merchant imo, he couldnt back up any of his reasons as to why Hughes should be sacked.
I think we will struggle this season similar to Aston Villa last year but avoid relegation and at the very least finish in the Semi's of the League Cup.
Transition was always going to be a struggle for this group of players.
Keep the faith, support your club, TP is the past, Sparky is the future.
Gooooooaaaaaarrrrrrrnnnnnnnn Stoke!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by steveminton77 on Nov 2, 2013 20:49:18 GMT
So who should? If anyone is to blame it is the Board for not supporting their appointed manager in the transfer market and as a result we are now in the situation of struggling to score goals (as we have been since the FA semi). This is not a new thing. Your anti-Hughes agenda really is quite pathetic. We are creating more chances overall, more possession overall and look more balanced overall - today was extremely difficult for both sides in the conditions, the major difference was that Southampton look like a side that has spent £60m extremely well on high-quality players that have been attracted to their charismatic manager. We will also have off-days, you don't play as per Old Trafford and then like we did today because everyone is a shitter. I do think the expectations at home are holding the team back though, with perhaps some tactical refinement needed - too many poor performances at home. I'll sit here and wait for your row of rolling smiley faces now in response, as you are incapable of submitting a reasoned argument. Tactical refinement 1- Please explain 2- Who is being paid to make these 'refinements'. 1. Pushing higher up the pitch, attacking as a unit, deploying Arnautovic in a centralised role, Assaidi used from the start - for example. 2. The manager and his backroom staff, obviously. |
|
|
|
Post by westpoint on Nov 2, 2013 20:55:59 GMT
Tactical refinement 1- Please explain 2- Who is being paid to make these 'refinements'. 1. Pushing higher up the pitch, attacking as a unit, deploying Arnautovic in a centralised role, Assaidi used from the start - for example. 2. The manager and his backroom staff, obviously. 1 and 2 not linked? |
|
|
|
Post by steveminton77 on Nov 2, 2013 21:26:14 GMT
1. Pushing higher up the pitch, attacking as a unit, deploying Arnautovic in a centralised role, Assaidi used from the start - for example. 2. The manager and his backroom staff, obviously. 1 and 2 not linked? They are intrinsically linked - I'd hoped that was clear from my initial post - management and playing staff need to link together or neither will progress. |
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Nov 2, 2013 22:42:46 GMT
Hughes must go? He shouldn't have been appointed in the first fuckin place! No fight and no fitness. Fuckin wank. Oh well, at least it's better to watch. So who should? If anyone is to blame it is the Board for not supporting their appointed manager in the transfer market and as a result we are now in the situation of struggling to score goals (as we have been since the FA semi). This is not a new thing. Your anti-Hughes agenda really is quite pathetic. We are creating more chances overall, more possession overall and look more balanced overall - today was extremely difficult for both sides in the conditions, the major difference was that Southampton look like a side that has spent £60m extremely well on high-quality players that have been attracted to their charismatic manager. We will also have off-days, you don't play as per Old Trafford and then like we did today because everyone is a shitter. I do think the expectations at home are holding the team back though, with perhaps some tactical refinement needed - too many poor performances at home. I'll sit here and wait for your row of rolling smiley faces now in response, as you are incapable of submitting a reasoned argument. Each to their own. Let's see how we finish up. I know where my cash is goin. |
|
|
|
Post by swampySCFC on Nov 2, 2013 22:57:11 GMT
embarrassing prick 'Hughes must go now he is a plank' I thought he was pissed our Dave. Either that or he bagged of school a lot |
|
|
|
Post by thehoof on Nov 2, 2013 23:00:30 GMT
I put up with two years of soul destroying, negative shot in the latter days of TP, and it was'by even that which made me think it was time for him to go.It was his constant"we are lucky to be here, these are bonus games" approach.
I think I'll give Hughes at least a season.
I know what my money was on if TP stayed, and that is why I would not have renewed if TP had stayed.
Come the end of the season, we will all know whether or not it has been the right decision or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2013 23:01:36 GMT
Hughes must go? He shouldn't have been appointed in the first fuckin place! No fight and no fitness. Fuckin wank. Oh well, at least it's better to watch. Well said. |
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Nov 2, 2013 23:27:35 GMT
Hughes must go? He shouldn't have been appointed in the first fuckin place! No fight and no fitness. Fuckin wank. Oh well, at least it's better to watch. Well said. Your opinion counts for jack shit. You're a Pulis fan not a Stoke fan. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2013 0:19:02 GMT
Chatty lady, we turned it off. Cringeworthy!
|
|
|
|
Post by yeswilko on Nov 3, 2013 0:26:30 GMT
Quite funny really, couldn't think of a better word to describe your good self Dave, ya plank.
|
|
She thinks Pulis is the answer (has she been in a coma for the last 2 years)? 
