|
|
Post by salopstick on May 30, 2013 14:56:00 GMT
Good interview, giving Hughes a chance
Who are the nutters
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on May 30, 2013 15:11:35 GMT
Good interview ruined by continuing the myth that those who were anti Hughes were the ones who were pro Pulis.
|
|
|
|
Post by chesterfieldstokie on May 30, 2013 15:13:25 GMT
Good interview ruined by continuing the myth that those who were anti Hughes were the ones who were pro Pulis. How do you know its a myth?? |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 30, 2013 15:15:13 GMT
The more militant anti Hughes folk do seem to be the more militant pro Pulis people. But there a lot of anti Hughes folk who wanted TP sacked too.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on May 30, 2013 15:17:41 GMT
Good interview ruined by continuing the myth that those who were anti Hughes were the ones who were pro Pulis. How do you know its a myth?? By reading this board and speaking to people. The most vicious anti Hughes sentiment I detected was from people who wanted us to insanely change tack and employ a Martinez. |
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on May 30, 2013 15:23:04 GMT
Who the hell's that Bryan shaw moaning his sack off in the sentinel. Not very clever
|
|
|
|
Post by airbornestokie on May 30, 2013 15:25:12 GMT
Anyone got a link for the interview
|
|
|
|
Post by mcf on May 30, 2013 15:33:49 GMT
I'm with you Momo
There were few rimmers on here left in any case and most PHWs that I know on the outside world are as indifferent and as underwhelmed as us.
I think it's more to do with him being an arrogant, boring twat more than anything else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2013 15:36:04 GMT
I don't see a link between the Pulis and Hughes people. I didn't engage with the whole PHW v Rimmer debate at all, but couldn't help but get involved recently because my reservations about Hughes were so strong. It's all based on Hughes and his track record post Blackburn for me. I really don't see what he's achieved since Blackburn. The top 10 argument looks as flimsy as the whole 'We're 10th FFS' argument under Pulis because of what Hughes spent at Man City, inherited at Fulham and the short period of time he's stayed at clubs. Oh, and Mark Bowen has made me cringe in his 6 month role as co-commentator on Radio 5  . Completely detached from Pulis. I'm completely open and want to be proved wrong. It's not an entrenched view based on the previous manager. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on May 30, 2013 15:38:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mcf on May 30, 2013 15:38:53 GMT
Smudge has always carried PHW stains on his shirt though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2013 15:49:04 GMT
Pro Pulis, Is it OK if I can be Pro Hughes?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2013 15:51:30 GMT
Pro Pulis, Is it OK if I can be Pro Hughes? apparently not....you must bleat, rant, rave, whinge, moan and decry everything Hughes does, says or even when he farts in his sleep...that's how it works rimmerboy p.s. that's a joke before i get lynched |
|
|
|
Post by stokielancer on May 30, 2013 15:53:16 GMT
I don't like smudge representing my football club. I personally find him boring. His newspaper articles also don't represent the supporters of SCFC!
|
|
|
|
Post by hollybush on May 30, 2013 15:56:57 GMT
I don't like smudge representing my football club. I personally find him boring. His newspaper articles also don't represent the supporters of SCFC! In that case maybe you should start and run your own fanzine successfully for many years, write for the papers and get interviewed all the time. Then we could all see how much of your tiny brain is representative of the supporters. |
|
|
|
Post by stokielancer on May 30, 2013 16:01:43 GMT
My tiny brain does not come in to the fact that I find his opinion boring! As for the fanzine I'm not interested in it either! I do quite like Proboards though to be fair! Thanks for your opinion!
|
|
|
|
Post by PolPotter on May 30, 2013 16:03:28 GMT
I was pro Pulis but finished up anti Pulis. I have always been anti Hughes. From the days of his management with Manchester City.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on May 30, 2013 16:03:42 GMT
I'm with you Momo There were few rimmers on here left in any case and most PHWs that I know on the outside world are as indifferent and as underwhelmed as us. I think it's more to do with him being an arrogant, boring twat more than anything else. Whereas Pulis was Mr. Personality 2013. Jeeeeez what a load of shit posted just lately. |
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on May 30, 2013 16:04:01 GMT
Good interview smudge , most people would agree with his comments
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2013 16:04:34 GMT
How do you know its a myth?? By reading this board and speaking to people. The most vicious anti Hughes sentiment I detected was from people who wanted us to insanely change tack and employ a Martinez. know it hasn't happened a lot recently momo but i agree with you here!! the people you refer to are what can sometimes be called "Idiots"........i never ever saw Martinez or Benitez as realistic to be honest, not due to their reputation or because we were "Too small" but simply due to the fact that if we were ever to get either of them in we'd have needed to sell half the squad and buy about another 12-15 players who could actually play their kind of football.if anyone genuinely believed we were suddenly going to see Whelan and Whitehead playing it around in nice little triangles while Shotts and Wilson bombed on up to the byeline overlapping their wingers then they really were deluded! Hughes is a safe compromise of being able to play some football AND keep a solid spine to the team, in theory we could evolve to play actual football and use our usual approach as merely a Plan B to fall back on if we ever need to scrap out a victory in an ugly game.here's hoping |
|
|
|
Post by stokielancer on May 30, 2013 16:07:16 GMT
Sparky Leslie's red'n'white Army!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by mcf on May 30, 2013 16:07:36 GMT
Pugs
I was indifferent and underwhelmed when Pulis was appointed the first time.
Difference was I knew little about TP.
I'm mainly indifferent and underwhelmed because of his ropey record rather than because he's an ex shit player and boring bastard.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2013 16:13:40 GMT
The 'inherited a good team' argument infuriates me. How many managers do that and totally fuck things up?
|
|
|
|
Post by ColonelMustard on May 30, 2013 16:14:57 GMT
I was in a very select band that didn't want Pulis gone but now I'm well up for the next chapter. That's football. The implication that the only thing there is to dislike about Hughes is that he isn't Pulis is laughable. Why not drag up a thread or two from one our games against Fulham a couple of years ago or even against QPR. The board was pretty unanimous that Hughes was a total cunt. Things change and now he's our cunt manager. What's not to like?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on May 30, 2013 16:15:59 GMT
Ropey recent record granted. Pulis came with a ropey record. Hughes is a decent PL manager who given the right backing should do a decent job.
Boring bastard - aren't they all?
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on May 30, 2013 16:21:55 GMT
I supported TP until his last few weeks at SCFC.
I have disliked LMH with a passion at his other clubs.
However, LMH is now our manager and I will support him to the extent I supported TP whilst such a position is tenable.
|
|
|
|
Post by mcf on May 30, 2013 16:31:27 GMT
We will see Pugs, we will see.
|
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on May 30, 2013 16:35:21 GMT
Good interview ruined by continuing the myth that those who were anti Hughes were the ones who were pro Pulis. How do you know its a myth?? Because Momo is the man when it comes to myth. After all, he creates most of them. See "Tone killed by men in suits" for a bit of top quality myth making.  |
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on May 30, 2013 16:38:02 GMT
Who the hell's that Bryan shaw moaning his sack off in the sentinel. Not very clever Gawd bless him but Bryan and not very clever are often found in the same sentence.  |
|
|
|
Post by airbornestokie on May 30, 2013 17:25:38 GMT
|
|
. Completely detached from Pulis.
