|
|
Post by lordeffinghamhunt on Feb 25, 2008 13:40:06 GMT
For killers, drug dealers, terrorists, treason and nonces that have all been 100% bang to rights!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2008 13:41:05 GMT
And for Neil Warnock, Richard & Judy and that guy off the Halifax adverts.
|
|
|
|
Post by prettything on Feb 25, 2008 13:42:25 GMT
No thanks, Adolf
|
|
|
|
Post by soicowboy on Feb 25, 2008 13:42:38 GMT
And Garth Crooks and Mrs Mangle from 'Neighbours'- evil old crow
|
|
|
|
Post by lordeffinghamhunt on Feb 25, 2008 13:43:32 GMT
Don't forget CJ and that old bint off Eggheads. One wouldn't half like a lap around the circuit with that Judith
|
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Feb 25, 2008 13:44:42 GMT
lord, if you can guarantee the 100% bang to rights part from our current legal system I might be up for listening to the rest (not that I necessarily agree). But since no-one can possibly guarantee that....
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2008 13:45:27 GMT
How could you ensure that they are "100%" bang to rights?
|
|
|
|
Post by lordeffinghamhunt on Feb 25, 2008 13:48:40 GMT
So don't you think that monster in Ipswich killed those young Lady's, That Huntley bloke killed those kids, The Yorkshire ripper, Denis Nielson, Ian Brady and a like. They all seem guilty enough to me. Do they feel anything about the human rights of the people that they killed?
|
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Feb 25, 2008 13:48:57 GMT
I would hate to be on a jury that got someone hanged, then find out later they hung an innocent man/woman.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Feb 25, 2008 13:49:48 GMT
By 100% bang to rights I think he means looks a bit shifty, has eyes too close together and is a little bit swarthy looking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2008 13:50:34 GMT
Either that or caught in the act.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordeffinghamhunt on Feb 25, 2008 13:54:14 GMT
Mr Momo, Going by your user name one sees that you may derive from a middle eastern back ground. Am I right in thinking that they still stone women to death for having an affair and chop peoples hands of for stealing?
|
|
|
|
Post by prettything on Feb 25, 2008 13:55:38 GMT
'Drug dealers, terrorists and nonces?'
These labels are way to broad.
You need to to be more subjective, otherwise you sound like a bit of a fascist plum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Godo on Feb 25, 2008 13:56:23 GMT
With DNA the "100% bang to rights" is much closer.
Can the "caring sharing" ones out there "100% guarantee" that convicted murderers, paedophiles, rapists etc will never repeat their crimes when released then?
I would suggest that the ratio of innocent people who lose their lives due to the release of repeat offenders compared with the hanging of the wrong person is about 50,000:1
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Feb 25, 2008 13:56:51 GMT
I was born in Longton but there were very similar attitudes to justice there. You'd love it.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordeffinghamhunt on Feb 25, 2008 13:58:54 GMT
OK. People who peddle drugs thus causing misery to millions, People who go out with intention to blow Innocent people up, people who go around shagging little kids. Is that better ???
|
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Feb 25, 2008 14:02:41 GMT
Godo, I'd be fine with much harsher sentencing and life sentences meaning life, I'm not being a tree-hugger about that. I want clean safe streets for everybody and we are way too soft on many things at the moment. But, actually taking a human life when there's a shadow of a doubt is something else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenilworth_Stokies on Feb 25, 2008 14:02:48 GMT
Bring back hanging? Yeah, and cholera and clogs.
Retards.
|
|
|
|
Post by prettything on Feb 25, 2008 14:13:38 GMT
'Blowing people up' could apply to most of the British government, then.
Some people regard 'drug dealers' as a service rather than 'destrying peoples' lives.
It just depends on your point of view.
Best to stick to the easy tabloid morality issues like child abuse, I say.
For what it's worth, the situation would be made worse if capital punishment was used for such an issue.
People who felt the need to commit such an offence, but hadn't yet, would then go underground and not seek help at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Feb 25, 2008 18:18:43 GMT
NO.
Apart from anything else, no State can logically, or morally, say murder is wrong, and to punish people who murder, we'll murder them.
Aside from that, would you trust the criminal justice system to always get convictions right? For there to never be any corrupt practices by the Police?
(And, I am instinctively against anything that Lordeffinghamhunt is in favour of).
|
|
|
|
Post by Scanner on Feb 25, 2008 22:05:48 GMT
Murderers and peado's for sure, i'm with you on this one me'lord  |
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Feb 25, 2008 23:06:56 GMT
If anyone killed any member of my family....I would simply return the favour.
Stonewall cases should be dealt with by the death penalty...ie DNA matches etc are completely reliable and are assessed by professional lab technicians.
Fred West,Myra Hindley,Shipman,Ian Brady are examples of bastuurds who would have been better killed in the same way as they commited their crimes.
|
|
|
|
Post by kidsgrovepotter on Feb 26, 2008 0:37:59 GMT
am sure that would make crimmals think twice before mudering someone,instead of getting off easy with couple of years in prison its a disgrace i my eyes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Feb 26, 2008 6:59:19 GMT
Look at Texas, one of the Death Penalty "capitals", and the number of people who have been put to death, by the State, who have subsequently been proved to be innocent, or at least where serious doubts have arisen about the conviction.
One always sticks in my mind. A man with severe learning disabilities, and a mental age below 10, went to the electric chair and fried. Later, it transpired that there were serious questions about the conviction, both about the evidence and the way he was abused by the police to force a conviction. Tragic thing about this was that, when given his final meal, he asked if he could leave his pudding 'til later.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chunky Lover! on Feb 26, 2008 10:03:56 GMT
I'm all for it, we can use Dave Jones as a test dummy
|
|
|
|
Post by basingstokie on Feb 26, 2008 13:43:50 GMT
No doubt the sicko's who murdered SallyAnne Bowman and the Ipswich ladies deserve the rope. I know some people say a lifetime in prison makes them truly suffer, but frankly I'd rather the tax payers money was not used to keep these killers alive, I couldn't care less what happens to them, I would have had them killed as they came out the Courtroom.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scanner on Feb 26, 2008 13:44:23 GMT
Tragic thing about this was that, when given his final meal, he asked if he could leave his pudding 'til later.  Please tell me you made that bit up, either way i think i've just pissed me self! ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Feb 26, 2008 14:02:47 GMT
No, not made up.
|
|
|
|
Post by y_oh_y_delilah on Feb 27, 2008 19:39:43 GMT
There's never been a doubt in my mind - hang 'em as high as possible!  |
|
|
|
Post by Spiros on Feb 28, 2008 17:23:32 GMT
what about chavs? Come to think of it i have never heard of someone hung reoffending.
|
|
