|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 15:58:54 GMT
Post by kevkj on Apr 20, 2013 15:58:54 GMT
Fantastic result ,so pleased. Said it for months we should have been playing 4-3-3 it suits our players. Wingers havent performed all season for one reason or another.So obvious to me. Whatever well done Stoke.
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:00:17 GMT
Post by RichardTMP on Apr 20, 2013 16:00:17 GMT
We played 4-3-3? Looked more like 4-2-3-1 The 3 being Adam Jerome and Walters.
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:04:44 GMT
Post by jbstokie on Apr 20, 2013 16:04:44 GMT
It was the same formation as always.
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:04:55 GMT
Post by kevkj on Apr 20, 2013 16:04:55 GMT
Possibly but we didnt play wingers was my point.
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:05:23 GMT
Post by kevkj on Apr 20, 2013 16:05:23 GMT
JB no it wasnt way more fluid.
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:08:50 GMT
Post by cheekymatt71 on Apr 20, 2013 16:08:50 GMT
Walters and Adam were definitely playing more narrow than usual for the winger positions. So 4-2-3-1 makes most sense
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:11:49 GMT
Post by jbstokie on Apr 20, 2013 16:11:49 GMT
JB no it wasnt way more fluid. 2 holding midfielders? Check 2 More attacking wide midfielders? Check 1 deep striker? Check 1 advanced striker? Check
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Apr 20, 2013 16:13:12 GMT
JB no it wasnt way more fluid. 2 holding midfielders? Check 2 More attacking wide midfielders? Check 1 deep striker? Check 1 advanced striker? Check That's how I saw it too. Difference (or perhaps the fluidity mentioned) comes naturally when Charlie plays as he drifts and N'Zonzi played on the front foot. Other than that it was the same system as ever.
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:14:34 GMT
Post by SCFC92 on Apr 20, 2013 16:14:34 GMT
I saw 4-4-2
with Adam and walters on the wings and Crouch flicking down to Jerome
Don't care anyway
GET IN!
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:15:35 GMT
Post by jbstokie on Apr 20, 2013 16:15:35 GMT
2 holding midfielders? Check 2 More attacking wide midfielders? Check 1 deep striker? Check 1 advanced striker? Check That's how I saw it too. Difference (or perhaps the fluidity mentioned) comes naturally when Charlie plays as he drifts and N'Zonzi played on the front foot. Other than that it was the same system as ever. Yep, the formation was the same as always but had a more positive attitude and someone with real pace up top.
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:17:27 GMT
Post by boskampsflaps on Apr 20, 2013 16:17:27 GMT
Same as ever, but with a bit more positivity from the manager and the players.
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:19:44 GMT
Post by Bick on Apr 20, 2013 16:19:44 GMT
![](http://i387.photobucket.com/albums/oo317/Bickstoke/stokelineup.png) Posted this earlier today on facebook. We were almost 4-3-3 at times today. It's no hope playing wingers when we don't have the quality, so we should use the assets we do have.
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:26:00 GMT
Post by jeycov on Apr 20, 2013 16:26:00 GMT
Yes and for the remaining games use the more experienced players. Cameron will come good next season imo
Leave Jerome on for the next game
Wilson may be out for the next game however.
Pity we are not playing Norwich later on this evening!!
|
|
|
4-3-3
Apr 20, 2013 16:46:06 GMT
Post by mightymike on Apr 20, 2013 16:46:06 GMT
It was still 4-4-1-1.
Adam on the right, Walters on the left, Crouch and Jerome up top.
|
|